Let’s see, half the skulls show serious violence, including against at least one child, and the native women are married to foreign men. That sounds more like the city was conquered, with the native men and children killed, and the native women taken as prizes, than this interpretation they’ve come up with.
That’s “sexist” so they’d rather pretend not to know, lol.
To: Boogieman; RegulatorCountry
posted on 05/04/2013 4:28:17 PM PDT
(Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
Bones from about 1900 to 1700 B.C. -- more than a millennium later than those examined by Kenoyer -- make it clear that at least some Harappan residents were subjected to savage violence
posted on 05/04/2013 5:44:49 PM PDT
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson