Posted on 05/09/2013 6:21:57 PM PDT by Morgana
What I don’t understand is how he got to be a school bus driver when he had domestic violence charges against him by his now-deceased ex-wife. Didn’t the school district bother to look up his records?
It is an impossibility that the nature of the unborn child and its fate are merely subjective.
For the State of Ohio to convict Castro of murder in these cases, a court will have to find that the children killed had the right not to be killed. But if that right is merely contingent on the frame of mind of the mother, it is no right at all.
Roger Taney thought he was performing a great public service by finally cutting through all the pretense, all the euphemisms, all the bullshit and stating, clearly, once and for all the basis of American slavery - that no negro had, or could have, any rights that a white man was bound to respect.
Taney seriously believed that he was defusing the powder keg that slavery had become - that once the matter was clear, in law, that peace would follow.
Abortion now is in the same place. It is a peculiar institution - in order to accomodate it, on the margins, every other law, custom, and tradition must get out of the way.
Look at the cover of People Magazine this week - "Kate's Baby Bump". Why is it a "baby" bump, when People Magazine campaigns so energetically for the "lump of tissue" theory?
The abortion peculiar institution has become completely incoherent. Common sense and elementary justice says Castro should hang for killing these babies - but Ohio can't allow that to happen (and if they do, the USSC will overrule them) - because to establish in law that these innocent little lumps of tissue are what they appear to be - will cause a war, just as surely as Roger Taney's famous decision did.
They were not babies in law, and the USSC will not allow any law to stand that makes them into babies.
It is impossible, as things now stand, to write a fetal murder law that would be constitutional.
Do the words”Affirmative Action Hiree” ring a bell?
Please tell me this guy is up for the death penalty.
There are already laws in some states that prosecute based on the death of an unborn child due to criminal activity.
But those laws are obviously unconstitutional, in that they treat defendants differently based on subjective criteria, denying them equal protection of the laws.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.