Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'The Great Gatsby' Book to Movie: 5 Key Differences
Yahoo ^ | May 10, 2013 | Breanne L. Heldman

Posted on 05/12/2013 10:50:03 AM PDT by EveningStar

If you haven't already, you're going to hear a whole bunch of gripes about "The Great Gatsby" movie out this weekend. And the biggest of them all will likely have something to do with how faithful it was to the classic F. Scott Fitzgerald novel.

Needless to say, there are some significant changes. But there are significant changes in "Iron Man" when put up against the comic books -- sometimes change is necessary, and even good. Then again, sometimes they're not.

(Excerpt) Read more at movies.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: bazluhrmann; fscottfitzgerald; thegreatgatsby

1 posted on 05/12/2013 10:50:03 AM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Borges; DollyCali; Perdogg

ping


2 posted on 05/12/2013 10:50:48 AM PDT by EveningStar ("What color is the sky in your world?" -- Frasier Crane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
#6 The book was good, the new movie sucks...
3 posted on 05/12/2013 10:54:21 AM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

#7: It’s a popular entertainment vehicle product.


4 posted on 05/12/2013 10:59:05 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I decided that the movie was going to be worthless trash when I heard bits from the musical score - rap and hip hop music instead of twenties and thirties style jazz.


5 posted on 05/12/2013 10:59:56 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Same thing that ruined Django.


6 posted on 05/12/2013 11:03:23 AM PDT by Califreak (11/6/12 The Day America Divided By Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Not wasting the money or the time on this drivel.
7 posted on 05/12/2013 11:22:50 AM PDT by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

That’s how Baz L directs, same old shtick. On a plus side, I;ve never liked Dicrapio movies. Just like Freeman, Tom Cruise etc, they look the same in every movie. At least Daniel day Lewis changes his looks in every film he does.


8 posted on 05/12/2013 11:31:30 AM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reg45

That’s from the trailer. Trailers frequently have their own music. I have no idea if it’s also in the movie.


9 posted on 05/12/2013 11:31:47 AM PDT by EveningStar ("What color is the sky in your world?" -- Frasier Crane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: verga

How do you know if the movie is drivel if you haven’t seen it.

I noticed that it’s getting mixed reviews.


10 posted on 05/12/2013 11:33:42 AM PDT by EveningStar ("What color is the sky in your world?" -- Frasier Crane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

There is a reason the 20’s and 30’s were called “The Jazz Age” and to use 21st century music in a period piece is anachronistic.


11 posted on 05/12/2013 11:41:21 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reg45

It’s a postmodernist it’s comment about the pop cultural swirl.


12 posted on 05/12/2013 11:44:04 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
For those unwilling to go for the "clickbait" title:
  1. Nick Carraway is in a sanitarium.
  2. Nick and Jordan Baker were definitely a thing.
  3. Jay Gatsby makes a grand entrance.
  4. Racism and anti-Semitism has been removed.
  5. Gatsby died thinking he was a winner.

13 posted on 05/12/2013 11:53:26 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
I saw the movie Friday night and IMHO, it's not as bad as some of the comments on this thread reflect. I'm guessing a good number of the negative comments are coming from folks who haven't seen it.

It's a good movie, and I'd be inclined to see it again. Yes, there are a few things, primarily the soundtrack, that keep it from being a great movie. Apart from that, it's well acted and visually stunning. It's far more engaging than the 1974 Redford attempt. I'm no fan of DiCaprio's politics and he's had some stinkers for movies. He's also had some very strong performances and this is one of them.

Joel Edgerton gives a very strong performance as Tom Buchanan. The "Nick in a Sanitarium" gimmick certainly sounds contrived when you read about it in a review, but it works pretty well on screen, and by employing a series of flashbacks it doubles down on the whole Gatsby/Daisy theme of idealizing the past and dealing with the present.

FWIW, I've long held that, as much as I thought the '74 film was an overall bomb, one of the best casting choices in all of filmdom was the selection of Sam Waterston to play Carraway. Prior to seeing the new film, I thought McGuire was really going to have the toughest role in this film, and while I still think Waterston's Carraway was better, McGuire did well enough with a tough role; I could be wrong, but it appeared to me as he spent a good bit of time studying Waterston's performance.

Just my $0.02.

14 posted on 05/12/2013 12:10:06 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
At least, you know what you're getting with Baz Luhrmann. You know it's going to be excessive and splashy and have a high trash factor. So there's little point in complaining about the result or attacking the film.

I probably will see it on video sooner or later without expecting much, and probably I'll like it more than Moulin Rouge. I don't think I could like it less.

I didn't mind the earlier version. It sort of defined the novel for me (and for other people too, though I guess we aren't supposed to admit it). It might be interesting to see a new take on the story

15 posted on 05/12/2013 12:24:36 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
4. Racism and anti-Semitism has been removed.

But does Meyer Wolfsheim still fix the 1919 World Series?

16 posted on 05/12/2013 12:31:27 PM PDT by newheart (The worst thing the Left ever did was to convince the world it was not a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: newheart

Yes.


17 posted on 05/12/2013 12:31:59 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Good. He was always a pivotal character for me, a lens that focuses the nihilism of the Twenties. If a noble institution like the World Series could be bought and sold, then all values and morality had become unmoored.


18 posted on 05/12/2013 12:59:53 PM PDT by newheart (The worst thing the Left ever did was to convince the world it was not a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: newheart

Although in this movie he has a molar for a tie-tack instead of cuff links (one more difference the purists will be sure to harp upon).


19 posted on 05/12/2013 1:02:07 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

So they decided to keep some of the anti-semitism in without making it so obvious.


20 posted on 05/12/2013 1:06:15 PM PDT by newheart (The worst thing the Left ever did was to convince the world it was not a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: newheart
Let's just say the film is truer to the book than some reviews give it credit for being.

While there are some small but significant liberties taken, IMHO, they actually serve to better relate the larger themes and emphasize the more obvious symbols and back story.

As mentioned above, the device of Carraway writing from an institution sounds very contrived in speaking or writing about it, yet on screen - it worked. Similarly, the flashbacks to Gatsby's childhood, Dan Cody and his days as a junior officer were brief but very effectively contributed to the overall telling of the story.

21 posted on 05/12/2013 1:13:57 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
How do you know if the movie is drivel if you haven’t seen it.

I noticed that it’s getting mixed reviews.

Didn't care for the book, and have not liked a single movie I have seen DiCaprio in.

Absolutely hated Titanic and walked out halfway through the movie (can't recall the name) that he was "gay" in.

In addition he is an uberliberal.

Three strikes in my book.

22 posted on 05/12/2013 1:21:36 PM PDT by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
Let's just say the film is truer to the book than some reviews give it credit for being.

Makes sense to me. And FWIW (without having seen it yet) DiCaprio strikes me as the best possible choice to play Gatsby from the current crop of actors—maybe because of, rather than in spite of, all the reasons he is hated on FR. (I would have liked to see Allison Pill as Daisy after she did such a believable job as Zelda in Woody Allen's Midnight in Paris.)

23 posted on 05/12/2013 1:31:31 PM PDT by newheart (The worst thing the Left ever did was to convince the world it was not a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: newheart

I agree. DiCaprio was an excellent casting choice for JG.


24 posted on 05/12/2013 2:17:06 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: verga
Absolutely hated Titanic and walked out halfway through the movie

Then you missed the best part, the part where he dies in the end.

25 posted on 05/12/2013 2:18:52 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: newheart

While the majority of the leads were libs, “Midnight in Paris” was amazing. Loved Picasso and Latrec.


26 posted on 05/12/2013 3:00:42 PM PDT by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
The movie I walked out halway through was the one he played the "gay" charector in. I had to sit through his over acting in the death scene of "Titanic".

The only reason I saw that either of them was that I owed the wife a chick flick. She didn't tlike the "gay" one either.

27 posted on 05/12/2013 3:05:28 PM PDT by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: newheart
So they decided to keep some of the anti-semitism in without making it so obvious.

In the movie, I heard the word "kike" used to refer to Jews, something I didn't see in the book.

28 posted on 05/14/2013 4:37:41 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

The musical score was ridiculous. There was no rap or disco in 1922. And the few tunes from the 1920’s that were used were all post-1922.


29 posted on 05/14/2013 4:40:00 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Did you see the movie?


30 posted on 05/14/2013 6:25:38 PM PDT by EveningStar ("What color is the sky in your world?" -- Frasier Crane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: verga

I thought that Hemingway in Midnight In Paris was spot on.Sexiest Hemingway ever!


31 posted on 05/14/2013 6:42:21 PM PDT by Mountain Bike Vomit Carnage (Cake or Death?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I just saw the movie this afternoon. In its favor, the 3-D technology certainly added to its entertainment value, and although it was more than two hours long, it was never boring.


32 posted on 05/14/2013 7:03:08 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

I thought the flashbacks to Gatsby’s childhood were an improvement on the book. And in the book, when Carraway asks Gatsby what part of the Midwest he is from, Gatsby answers “San Francisco.” The movie omitted this ridiculous answer.


33 posted on 05/14/2013 7:13:59 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
FWIW:

Rotten Tomatoes

Metacritic

34 posted on 05/14/2013 7:15:18 PM PDT by EveningStar ("What color is the sky in your world?" -- Frasier Crane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
I was hoping the musical score would include the tunes mentioned in the book:
35 posted on 05/14/2013 7:26:46 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson