Skip to comments.The Church of Scotland's Scandal
Posted on 05/14/2013 2:22:09 AM PDT by servo1969
Earlier this month, the Church of Scotland issued a report titled "The Inheritance of Abraham? A Report on the 'Promised Land.'"
The essence of the report is that according to the Bible, Jews have no more attachment to the land of Israel than anyone else. Hence "promised land" is in quotation marks in the report's title -- because there is no promised land.
In the report's words: "The New Testament contains a radical re-interpretation of the concepts of 'Israel,' 'temple,' 'Jerusalem' and 'land.' When the Bible mentions 'Israel,' it does not mean Israel; when it says 'temple,' the Bible does not mean the Jewish temple; 'Jerusalem' does not mean the city of Jerusalem; and 'land' does not mean land.
"Promises about the land of Israel," the report continues, "were never intended to be taken literally, or as applying to a defined geographical territory."
Even during the worst excesses of Christian anti-Semitism in the Middle Ages, it is doubtful that any normative Christian body declared that "Israel," "the temple," "Jerusalem" and "the land" no longer meant or were ever intended to mean what those words represent.
This claim is not only profoundly anti-Semitic. It is an act of theological forgery; it makes a mockery of the Bible as a coherent document and it renders Christianity inherently anti-Semitic.
It would be as if a major post-Christian religious body had announced that "Jesus," "Christ," "crucifixion" and "resurrection" had never meant what Christians and the New Testament had always understood them to mean. Imagine if a major Muslim body declared that Jesus means Muhammad; Christ means Quran; crucifixion means Islamophobia; and resurrection means the Hajj.
I have never equated criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism. But the Church of Scotland report is not about criticism of Israel; it is about invalidating the Jewish people and invalidating the Jews' historically incontestable claims to the land upon which the only independent states that ever existed were Jewish.
--The Church of Scotland report asserts that the Bible does not support the existence of a Jewish state: "There has been a widespread assumption by many Christians as well as many Jewish people that the Bible supports an essentially Jewish state of Israel. This raises an increasing number of difficulties. ... "
--It asserts that justice and the existence of a Jewish state are mutually exclusive: "There is a direct conflict of interest between wanting human rights and justice for all and retaining the right to the land."
--It asserts that the Jews' return to Israel has no biblical basis.
--It asserts that the notion that the Jews have or ever had a special relationship with God -- one of the most oft repeated ideas in the Hebrew Bible -- is negated in that very same Bible: "That exclusivist tradition implied Jews had a special, privileged position in relation to God. But the prophetic tradition stood against this." The Chosen People is not chosen, in other words.
--It asserts that God's promise of the land to Abraham has nothing to do with the Jews; it is only about Jesus: "The promise to Abraham about land is fulfilled through the impact of Jesus, not by restoration of land to the Jewish people."
--It asserts that even Jesus -- that proud, religious Jew -- did not believe in any special relationship between God and the Jews: "Jesus offered a radical critique of Jewish specialness ... "
At the same time, this truly immoral document does not devote a word to why there were Palestinian refugees: While the Jews accepted the 1947-48 partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states, all the neighboring Arab states rejected the partition and invaded the Jews in order to annihilate Israel at birth.
Nor does the report devote a single sentence to how Israel's occupation of the West Bank came about: In 1967, Israel's neighbors sought to exterminate Israel just as Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah and most Palestinians and other Muslims in the Middle East today wish to now. And that only because of that war, won by Israel, did Israel come to occupy the West Bank of Jordan.
Nor is a word devoted to Palestinian national honoring of their numerous terrorists, or to the exterminationist and anti-Semitic propaganda that saturates Middle East media or to the widespread Palestinian support for terrorism (according to the just-released Pew Forum poll of Muslims, 40 percent of Palestinians support suicide terror).
And the Church of Scotland did not think it important to even hint at what happened in Gaza after the Israelis gave the whole of Gaza to the Palestinians: The Palestinians converted it into a terror-state that regularly launches rockets into Israel to kill as many Israelis as possible.
And, most vile of all, the Church of Scotland never once notes, let alone condemns, the Muslim countries and organizations that seek to annihilate Israel, an existential threat that no other country or people in the world face.
The Church of Scotland has given voice to the ugliest depiction of Jews since medieval times. The official reaction of the Scottish Jewish community is that Christian-Jewish post-Holocaust dialogue seems to have been a moral and intellectual waste of time. I do not agree. But if other Christian churches do not condemn the Church of Scotland -- despite its promise to revise its report to include a statement that Israel has a right to exist (!) -- even pro-Christian Jews will wonder whether the Scottish Jewish community's reaction is valid.
And how did this happen? The report is a combination of medieval Christian anti-Judaism and contemporary leftist anti-Zionism. For Jews and Israel, that's a lethal combination.
OMG These people wouldn’t know a Bible if it hit them in the back of the head and if I ever get to meet one of them it will!
In the thirties and even into the 40s the great sin of the Anglosphere, with notable exceptions-a fellow named W. Churchill comes to mind, paid no mind to the welling up of anto Jewish sentiment and activity in Germany. We have not the excuse of slow or minimal communications now. We KNOW what he Mohammedans are saying AND DOING. and yet we still treat it as legitimate cultural difference and enthusiastically import it into America and Britain.
The Church of Scotland must be some sort of marginal cult- hmmm?
Did not Scotland also let the PanAm terrorist leave
prison after murdering scores.
Scotland is Terrorists’-Land.
Note to The Jewish People:
Not everyone who calls themselves a “christian” is one.
The document is available at Scribd
Had a slightly less then quick skim. They make many but nowhere near all the points, with direct quotes from Scripture, for the, on a Biblical basis, gift of the land of Israel by God to the Jews, their living there and then their disbursement amongst the Gentiles.
There are many many quotes not noted in the document about the return of the Jews to the land here’s one from Zechariah 10:9 “Though I scatter them among the peoples, yet in distant lands they will remember me. They and their children will survive, and they will return.”
Then they take quotes not directly referring to the matter at hand- some about behavior in an effort to make God’s promise conditional. Some stuff about violence and Christians not being able to support Israel because they took the country by force. I wonder where they stand on Great Britain ruling Scotland or the USA having power over the native Indians. Then some well written points about Justice which are by no means moot but do not directly refer to the Jewish ownership of the land.
As for the reference to 2 Corinthians 1:20 are we to take it that because they are “Yes” they are in fact complete or if complete in the heaven-lies have we seen their fullness here and or have the Jews?
Are we to take the return of the Jews to their land as only a sign of the interfering nature of western politicians?
Where do these same people stand on the question of the Palestinians? Hmm I wonder!
So as to providing a direct, clear biblical basis for excluding ownership of the land of Israel to it’s current owners they have not done so well!?
A lot of the questions I ask here are not necessarily directed at you Steve - some if not most are rhetorical.
Once again the historically and Biblically ignorant insist just about everyone is Jewish except the actual Jewish people.
As opposed to America, who let IRA terrorist murderers go free for decades.
Careful when dismounting that high horse of yours.
OMG These people wouldnt know a Bible if it hit them in the back of the head and if I ever get to meet one of them it will!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.