Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Kim and LaRue Temple: a match made in a parking lot (Bartender, Teen Blossom at US Open)
Yahoo News ^ | 06/16/2013 | Eric Adelson

Posted on 06/16/2013 6:13:27 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen

--snip-- A teenager named Michael Kim, a student at Cal, needed a caddie for the U.S. Open. This was not a big-dollar gig. Kim is an amateur. Even if he won the whole blasted tournament, he couldn't take a dime. Not that a 19-year-old was about to contend for the U.S. Open. Unless he did. Kim and Temple got along great, and the boy wonder, who earned college player of the year honors, actually made the cut.

(Excerpt) Read more at sports.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: golf; open; usga
Kim is 150 lbs soaking wet..
1 posted on 06/16/2013 6:13:27 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FlJoePa; jazusamo; Baynative

*** US Open Ping ***


2 posted on 06/16/2013 6:16:20 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

If he wins, why can’t he take the purse?

I can understand that might have to be held in escrow, due to his age. But if he wins it, it should be his.


3 posted on 06/16/2013 6:19:36 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

4 posted on 06/16/2013 6:26:42 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's next run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

If he wants to continue his college golf career (he’s only a sophomore) he has to play as an amateur.


5 posted on 06/16/2013 6:27:15 AM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen
Great story. Thanks for posting.

partee at the 19th.

6 posted on 06/16/2013 6:27:27 AM PDT by NautiNurse (Now we all have Obama phones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Because NCAA & USGA rules won’t even allow that. It’s not about his age, it’s about maintaining his amateur status for college and other USGA events in the future.


7 posted on 06/16/2013 6:28:22 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
If he wins, why can’t he take the purse? I can understand that might have to be held in escrow, due to his age. But if he wins it, it should be his.

Makes no sense to me either - maybe it's because he isn't a card-carrying PGA pro. Seems like such a feat would validate the concept of awarding him full status as he would be beating the world's best golfers in a prestigious event.

It may take him out of the amateur competitions, but what's to say he couldn't be a pro while attending college - last I knew there was no prohibition for a college kid to earn money before he graduates/drops out.

8 posted on 06/16/2013 6:30:32 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trebb

I think the rational is that, people who are pro’s, tend to play at a significantly higher level than the amateurs.

If they didn’t have this rule, many of the pro’s would stay amateurs so that they could just rack up wins and not allow the amateurs, who aren’t capable of playing at a pro level, to ever win a round.


9 posted on 06/16/2013 6:33:03 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

10 posted on 06/16/2013 6:36:52 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Pathway to the qualification is different for amateurs. Certain pros qualify based upon their standings and history. Those pros who do not qualify outright, and amateurs qualify by going through elimination tournaments. Amateurs, since they are not pros, do not play for purses. Why would one do that? Either they are monumentally wealthy, or a lover of the game as a game, or do not want to impact their amateur standing say for a college scholarship or mental cases!


11 posted on 06/16/2013 6:41:11 AM PDT by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

One thing for sure....Tiger ain’t gonna win it.


12 posted on 06/16/2013 6:54:28 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Sorry to get off the subject, but I just read about Adam Scott and Steve Stricker eyed about possible rules violations that were called in by viewers. The two were eventually cleared, but it leads to two observations by me:

1. Where is everyone saying that these two should disqualify themselves for bringing shame on the game even though they weren’t guilty of anything? You say you didn’t hear about it? That’s why Tiger gets so much coverage, with the exception of Phil or Rory nobody cares about anyone else.

2. When is golf going to quit taking phone calls from viewers claiming rules violations? If these no-lifes want to referee golf so damn bad, let them volunteer as PGA marshals. At any rate, they should at least have to provide their names, addresses, and work place so that someone can monitor their activities 24 hours a day and see if their not violating some obscure law.


13 posted on 06/16/2013 7:32:03 AM PDT by wrcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrcase

Their = they’re


14 posted on 06/16/2013 7:45:12 AM PDT by wrcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wrcase

I have provided my name, address, and work place so that someone can monitor my activities 24 hours a day and see if I’m not violating some obscure law.


15 posted on 06/16/2013 8:08:35 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (we're the Beatniks now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

My point(which was mostly tongue-in-cheek) is that no other sport allows TV viewers to make rulings that can decide outcomes. The marshals on the course have to take responsibility for their rulings. The TV viewer doesn’t and if they had to shed their anonymity they wouldn’t be so quick to call. The point I was serious about was not taking the calls in the first place.


16 posted on 06/16/2013 8:25:08 AM PDT by wrcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Good story, thanks for the ping.


17 posted on 06/16/2013 9:25:11 AM PDT by jazusamo ("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrcase

Taking action based on viewers’ calls is blatantly unfair to those best golfers who are televised more often than others, Tiger chief among them. It is a scandal that it has not been discontinued long ago. Craig Stadler’s towel should have ended it.


18 posted on 06/16/2013 9:51:57 AM PDT by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God IS, and (2) God IS GOOD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

By rule, an amateur must declare himself to be professional prior to the beginning of the tournament in order to collect prize money. But I suspect, as another poster suggested, that it was precisely Kim’s amateur status that allowed him into the field in the first place, by way of qualifying through a venue open only to amateurs.


19 posted on 06/16/2013 9:55:33 AM PDT by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God IS, and (2) God IS GOOD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wrcase

ya, but I am a member of the usga so they hafta take my call ....


20 posted on 06/16/2013 10:12:44 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (we're the Beatniks now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hebrews 11:6

what about his towel?


21 posted on 06/16/2013 10:42:59 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

In 1987 Craig Stadler had to play a shot from his knees by a tree. He placed a towel on the ground so he wouldn’t get his pants dirty. Some mouth-breathing no-life called and said that Stadler had “built a stance” which is against the rules of golf. Upon further review the officials agreed and Stadler was disqualified. The thing is the official referees on the course didn’t call it and Stadler didn’t think it was “building a stance”. I’m not going to debate the rule, my point is that it wasn’t the viewer’s place to make the call.

On a side note the groundskeepers decided to cut down the tree later and invited Stadler to do the honors.


22 posted on 06/16/2013 11:29:25 AM PDT by wrcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson