Skip to comments.When does life begin…for living babies?
Posted on 06/19/2013 1:11:03 PM PDT by Morgana
June 19, 2013 (LiveActionNews.org) - Words are powerful. They can be used to illuminate, and they can be used to conceal. Consider this excerpt from MSNBCs Meet the Press:
Pastor Rick Warren clearly asked, At what point does a baby get human rights? but for some reason Tom Brokaw seemed to be hearing another question, When does life begin?
When does life begin? The abortion debate is so often framed around that question, but of course, that question is entirely irrelevant to the abortion debate. Abortions can only be performed on living babies! If the human fetus was not alive, then it could not be killed.
The absurdity of such language was on full display in Live Actions latest video:
Late term abortion doctor LeRoy Carhart states,
Well, in my heart and my mind, you know, life begins when the mother thinks it begins, not when anybody else things it begins. For some women its before they conceive; for some women, its never. Even after they deliver, its still a problem, not a baby.
Carhart purports to be answering the question, When does life begin? but of course he is not answering that question at all. Carhart does not actually believe that you existed before your parents had sex, nor does he believe that an infant squirming in the incubator is dead. Carhart does not doubt for one moment that a living member of the species Homo sapiens comes into existence at the moment of conception. He knows the fetus is alive, but he does not care.
As I argued in a previous post, genocide, slavery, abortion, and infanticide are all based on the notion that human rights are not intrinsic to the species Homo sapiens but are rather bestowed on certain individuals by society. As two Australian philosophers concluded in their defense of infanticide (or as they call it, after-birth abortion), Merely being human is not in itself a reason for ascribing someone a right to life.
This notion stands in stark contrast to the view that all human beings have an intrinsic and inestimable value, a view which is often grounded in the conviction that human beings are created in the image of God (Gen. 1:27).
Therefore, the question at the heart of the abortion debate is not, When does life begin? but rather, Which humans have value? If the pro-choice lobby is afraid of this question, perhaps it is because, deep down inside, Americans already know the answer.
Logic. If it dies, was it not first alive?
So a new question is asked: "When does personhood begin?"
If an living human being is not a person, then that living human being does not possess inalienable rights.
Of course, this is the same argument used by Nazis and slavery proponents to justify genocide of non-person humans and slavery of non-person humans, respectively.
Appropriate bed-fellows for the abortionists, in my humble opinion.
Dead/non-living tissue cells do not divide.
I know I didn’t have any rights at all until I was 18 and moved out of the house.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.