Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: IMR 4350
Whenever you come across a situation like this you simply have to look for the broader financial angle. If cities have a financial incentive to "reduce crime," they will under-report crime. In other circumstances, there might be a huge incentive to over-report something -- which explains why an organization like MADD reports statistics based on "alcohol-related accidents" that have nothing to do with drunk driving.
17 posted on 06/22/2013 7:31:38 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I am the master of my fate ... I am the captain of my soul.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
The falsifying of the crime stats starting in January of 1993 was related to Clinton's firing of the US Attorney's to cover up police corruption.

In 1991 with the R King case, Bush ordered a review of all complaints filed against police with the FBI for the previous 5 years. There were something around 15,000 complaints and only 42 cases had been pursued in court.

The Bent One’s ordering his Arkansas state troopers to racial profile was one of the 42. With the settlement of the suite Clinton agreed to stop the racial profiling, but he didn't.

After the LA riots of 1992, the FBI said there was nothing in the 15,000 FBI files so Bush then ordered the US Attorney's to review the complaints.

After almost 2 years of the dems. having an all out campaign against police because of R King, the Chief of Police Union and the Police Officers Union supported Clinton for president.

Leading up to the 1992 election the dems kept pushing for Bush to release the content of the 15,000 FBI files, but Bush never did.

When Reno was nominated for AG, she said if she was confirmed the first thing she would do was release the content of the FBI files.

When Reno was confirmed as AG, instead of releasing the content of the 15,000 FBI files, Reno fired all the US Attorneys to cover up what was in the files. No one paid any attention because everyone was too busy watching the Clintons kill 80 people at Waco.

The falsifying of the records was the payoff to Clinton by the unions for covering up police corruption.

23 posted on 06/22/2013 8:01:25 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

One thing I forgot to mention.

The way police are able to get away with covering up the corruption, built right into the police union contract is a nice little clause, if the person filing the complaint against the police officer is “obviously intoxicated” the complaint against the officer doesn’t have to be accepted, it can be ignored.

Police can do pretty much what they wanted and simply claim the victim is intoxicated.

No investigation of the complaint, and the victim is prosecuted.

First hand knowledge.

They did it to me.


24 posted on 06/22/2013 8:11:58 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson