Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/24/2013 5:58:52 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: Olog-hai

Gross


2 posted on 06/24/2013 6:01:30 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Pray you never need blood. Prostitutes too? Good going, Germany. Not.


3 posted on 06/24/2013 6:01:32 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

What could go wrong? /sarc


4 posted on 06/24/2013 6:02:05 AM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

sick, not only do they like to have sex with fecal matter and then get much more diseases but they now are to give blood.

Yea nothing wrong there , just like them infiltrating kids groups and we’re now seeing kids being molested by these people


5 posted on 06/24/2013 6:03:31 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Fogedaboudit!


6 posted on 06/24/2013 6:03:37 AM PDT by MS.BEHAVIN (Women who behave rarely make history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
When I had my hip replaced a few years ago (at a major,well known hospital) the surgeon strongly encouraged me donate my own blood beforehand that would be stored and be given back to me if blood loss during surgery necessitated it (which,I was told,turned out to be the case).He didn't need to tell me *why* he was recommending it.I was at the hospital's blood bank at the precise times set...with bells on (IIRC I had to go several times).
8 posted on 06/24/2013 6:09:26 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The Civil Servants Are No Longer Servants...Or Civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
to remove the blanket ban on men who have sex with men, those with lots of sexual partners and prostitutes, from donating blood.

I thought this was semi-satire news. We're living in bizzaro world.

9 posted on 06/24/2013 6:09:46 AM PDT by Spirochete (Does the FedGov have the attributes of a legitimate government?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
A nurse with whom I worked for 20 years in a large hospital's ER contracted HIV *and* Hep C from a needle stick...a few years after I had left the department.Anyone familiar with the workings of ERs,ORs,ICUs and other fast paced hospital departments knows that needle sticks are an all-too-common occurrence and are a huge risk to health care folks...and have been even since before the appearance of AIDS.
10 posted on 06/24/2013 6:14:03 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The Civil Servants Are No Longer Servants...Or Civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

How about active intravenous drug users? Hepatitis patients? Hell.. just allow everybody!


11 posted on 06/24/2013 6:18:35 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
Currently a Europe-wide ban prevents them from doing so...

I donated blood recently for the first time in quite a while (lazy I guess).There were many questions..."are you in good health?"..."have you ever had hepatitis?"..."have you ever had sex with a man?"...."did you ever travel to Europe between the years XXXX and YYYY?" (can't recall what years were stated).I passed...and at the end I asked "why the question about Europe?" "Mad Cow Disease" was the answer.

So it looks like Europe isn't even afraid of Mad Pervert Disease today.

12 posted on 06/24/2013 6:22:25 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The Civil Servants Are No Longer Servants...Or Civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Are the members of the German Medical Association so insulated from the actual practice of medicine that they know they, themselves, would not be exposed to diseased-infected blood ... or are they so ideology-addled that they think the principle of “supporting” sodomites is worth dying for?


13 posted on 06/24/2013 6:35:33 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("The world understands that Putin means it and Obama doesn't." ~Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Hmmm, let’s review my present understanding....

I spent a few years in the UK doing grad studies...during the great mad liberal...er...mad Pelosi...er...mad cow times.

Consequently, I cannot donate blood.

A gay person can butt boink, pack fudge, press baby ruths, attack muffins, and perhaps play brokeback mountain with a boy scout and he can give blood?

Sooner or later, we’re going to have to “just say no” and back that up with a bit of heat.


14 posted on 06/24/2013 6:36:40 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Donate contaminated blood. Help save lives! ? (I miss common sense in my news and world.)


15 posted on 06/24/2013 6:37:27 AM PDT by convocation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

The soluton can be quite simple—if the gay passes HIV in the blood, he will be executed as if it were a murder. This could apply for all donors who pass this disease. Too bad.


16 posted on 06/24/2013 6:39:05 AM PDT by SgtHooper (The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Insane


17 posted on 06/24/2013 6:47:54 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Just stop for a moment and try to think. No virus, no retrovirus, has the ability to detect gender-only hosts. If that doesn’t put you on the right track to the AIDs scam, then there isn’t much hope for you. As far as blood from homosexuals, no thanks. Hepatitis B is rampant among homosexuals who are IV drug users. And that’s just for starters. No thanks.


18 posted on 06/24/2013 6:57:27 AM PDT by Doc Savage ("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

They can give it to each other all they want; don’t give it to me.


20 posted on 06/24/2013 7:07:19 AM PDT by NRA1995 (I'd rather be a living "gun culture" member than a dead anti-gun candy-ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

These decisions are not based on science anymore; they are actually antithetical to real science.

The medical associations, psych associations, and health agencies are owned by homosexuals now. Don’t ever expect any sanity to come from them.


21 posted on 06/24/2013 7:17:03 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
Since when is donating blood a Right?
Saving other peoples lives is an act of charity and responsibility.
If you suspect you may have ANY communicable ailment, you should not donate. That would be the responsible thing to do.
If you deliberately put others at risk you are neither charitable or responsible.

I too used to donate blood regularly but had to stop because of the Mad Cow scare.
I bet the risk of mad cow is minuscule compared to the AIDS threat.

22 posted on 06/24/2013 7:25:09 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

In all fairness, blood is filthy stuff. While everyone’s blood contains contaminants, “allogeneic blood”, blood from other people, is far more dangerous than “autologous blood” that a person donates with intention that it be put back in them during surgery.

A lot of problems are overcome by using tricks to get around the need for allogeneic blood. For example, stimulants that increase red blood cell production, other fluids to keep up the total fluid level preventing shock, such as blood substitutes. A lot of research is going into chemicals that carry oxygen and external processes that can oxygenate the blood and return it to the body.

And there is also surgical “blood salvage”, where blood lost during surgery is filtered and returned to the body; as well as surgical techniques that strongly limit blood loss.

In any event, no longer using allogeneic blood has radically reduced the transmission of viral diseases, which means the biggest threat is bacterial contamination while taking the blood out or putting it back in.

Surgery and blood transfer are so prone to bacterial infection that typically antibiotics have to be used to prevent infection. But these can also destroy “good” bacteria, creating the chance for bad, opportunistic infections from antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

All told, there is so much going on here that eventually it is hoped that there will be little if any need for allogeneic blood transfusions, except for very rare blood *components*. Which is probably a very good thing.


23 posted on 06/24/2013 7:31:43 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson