Obama's global-warming claims demolished

World Net Daily ^ | 7/1/2013 | Bob Unruh

[rktman]

Dubbed the “high priest of climate skepticism,” former Margaret Thatcher adviser Christopher Monckton has become a formidable foe of the movement claiming mankind is causing catastrophic “global warming,” noting that the average worldwide temperature has not risen in nearly two decades.

So when President Obama recently announced his plan to bypass Congress and use his executive power to “fight climate change,” targeting the coal-energy industry, Monckton responded.

[rktman]

Owww. He's gonna be in trouble. He better get ready to be ridiculed (i.e. bullied) for daring to counter prof/king hussein and his thesis concerning the worlds greatest threat ever known. No, not prof/king hussein yapping, but climate change. I'm looking forward to having beach front property here in the Sierras.

[FiddlePig]

As we already know this ain’t about “science” or “saving” the Earth!!! It’s about totalitarian control and one world government (new world order… to quote a recent GOP president)!!! What’s odd (really not) is that this “crisis” like all others can only be “solved” by imposition of a socialist/fascist top-down dictatorship. Most of those loyal to the Left political spectrum seem willing to surrender their liberty, prosperity and maybe even their souls (and that of future generations) to such a dictatorship (all is OK as long as they can abort their babies and have “gay marriage”)!

Hyper-bureaucrat overlords will ration and control ALL aspects of your soon to be grim life! (for what is proved WRONG!). No one can escape from this tyranny because they might violate the “cure” for saving our planet. Living one’s life (of course), puts the Earth at “risk”. You will have to file a “flight plan” and beg permission to drive to the beach (or anywhere not in your approved zone) as you may exceed your carbon ration (and it will co$t MUCHO DOLLAR$). However, those (our “leaders”… er… rulers, etc.) at the top of this carbon “Ponzi” scam will be exempt from its tyranny (of course!).

[rktman]

You mean they might jet off to deepest darkest africa or something to find their roots? Peons will die. Elites will fly. Do NOT exceed your CO2 release quota.

[American in Israel]

Then Monckton launched into a point-by-point demolition of Obama’s claims: The “worry that rising levels [of CO2] might someday disrupt the fragile balance that makes our planet so hospitable” is scientifically unfounded. CO2 concentrations, at almost 400 μatm, are almost as low as they have ever been in geological time. In the Jurassic era, 175 million years ago, CO2 concentration was about 6000 μatm; in the Cambrian era, 550 million years ago, it was 8000 μatm; and in the Neoproterozoic era, 750 million years ago, it was 30,000 μatm, or 75 times today’s concentration. Yet the planet survived and throve. This guy Stomps Obamas Lies, one after the other. Good read

[rktman]

But, since he’s a confirmed denier (even with facts) he will be ridiculed and called a flat earther and maybe even worse derisive names for daring to question “the one”. Sorry dang state of affairs ain’t it? I just read a statement in a book I’m reading which rings truer than I would like. To paraphrase, “Laws and facts mean nothing. The only thing that matters is what you can make people believe.” A lot of us have always known that. I believe they call us free thinkers who are not easily led astray by false claims and we actually question things. Shrinking group I believe. Hoping and praying not.

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

More to the point, when conservative candidates are running for president, they must be asked whether they are willing to work with congress to reduce the unconstitutional powers that former presidents have adopted. There is a short list that they can answer to:

1) Prohibiting the “Presidential Signing Statement”, which usurps both legislative and judicial powers. (This is one of the most blatantly unconstitutional acts the presidents engage in.)

2) Prohibiting the use of the “Presidential Proclamation” to take lands from the states, along with a restoration of most of those state lands already taken, outside of Indian reservations and military reservations.

3) Strictly defining the parameters of “Executive Privilege”.

4) Restoration of both the War Powers Act and the Posse Comitatus Act.

5) Reform and reorganization of the 16 major intelligence agencies.

6) Reform and reorganization of the 100+ federal police agencies.

7) Reform and reorganization of the federal bureaucracy under the scrutiny of a congressional Office of Inspector General, which can suspend bureaucratic regulations until they are reviewed and approved by congress.

8) Prohibition of arsenals and tactical police units for non-Intelligence and non-federal police agencies.

9) Reorganization of the federal judiciary to improve efficiency.

I’m sure this list could be substantially increased.

[TigersEye]

Obama’s declarations included:

The “sea level in New York, in New York Harbor, are (sic) now a foot higher than a century ago.”

Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud

Sea levels began to rise 18k years ago at the end of the last glacial period. They have risen about 135 meters since then which is an average of 7.5 millimeters per year. That is an average of 750 mm per century (29.5 inches) which is far more than the average over the last century.

From 1880 to 2000 sea level rose about 20 cm or just under 8 inches. Far far less than the nearly 30 inches per century average over the last 18,000 years.

[rktman]

No doubt it can be increased. I have a lot of things I could add to the list but as long as the population centers and no/low info voters can stuff the ballot boxes a candidate who would espouse such things isn’t going to get elected. Sorry friggin’ situation. Sure has reversed from the king of camelots statement about what your country can do for you. Apparently for a lot of folks it’s “not enough stuff”.

[Fireone]

“6) Reform and reorganization of the 100+ federal police agencies.”

How about we ELIMINATE all but 3 federal police agencies, and strictly limit the powers of those 3?

[MHGinTN]

Little barry bastard boy’s masters tell him to push for the carbon credits scam, so little barry dimwit does as he’s told. He is not smart enough to understand the essence of why he is lying, he just does as he is told and lies repeatedly and authoritatively ... kind of like al goreghoul in dark face but even more clueless.

[TigersEye]

He’s not likely to hear or read anything contrary to the script he’s given while sitting in his underwear watching bassaball and filling out his NBA picks.

[MHGinTN]

Did you mean while sitting around in Reggie’s underwear?

[TigersEye]

I’m sure he just grabs whatever is closest at the time. lol

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_law_enforcement_in_the_United_States

I figure that the best could be a reduction to perhaps 20-30, because there are some legitimate police functions.

Each of the military branches has their own police, Customs and Border Patrol, US Marshals, FBI, Secret Service, US Postal Inspector, Park Rangers, Federal Protective Service (federal buildings security), National Institute of Health (Public Health Service), Bureau of Indian Affairs Police, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Diplomatic Security, Bureau of Engraving and Printing & US Mint police, Judicial Branch police, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission police.

Many of the reductions would still have useful functions, but would be rolled into other police agencies. Others are not “public” agencies, so only police their particular agency. For example, each of the 16 Intelligence agencies has their own internal police, mostly for policing themselves up.

[MHGinTN]

Delegislate obamacare and close the IRS. And if it can be done on little barry bastard boy’s watch, so much the better.