Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce
The user effectively has been granted a right to engage in a commercial transaction without anyone knowing anything about that transaction, including the other party to the transaction. This social decision carries costs.

That's exactly how most brick-and-mortar transactions work. Entering the store in and of itself isn't value I have to tender value in exchange for. If I want a gallon of milk, that IS value, but the only value I must offer in exchange is the posted price of the milk, in money, not personal information.

Using traditional commerce as an analogy is a mistake for these people. The stores trying to hop onto the spy-on-your-customer bandwagon with loyalty cards are the ones who are out of order, not the customer who expects his purchase to be anonymous as it historically has been. And -- there are plenty of stores that don't insult the dignity and intelligence of their customer base in that way, including the bane of any liberal, Wal*Mart, and a store that I suspect is disproportionately staffed and patronized by liberals, Trader Joes.

8 posted on 07/21/2013 12:24:01 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Still Thinking

Right. I go into a store and buy a soda and pay cash - they wont know me from Adam. They definitely do not get to follow me everywhere I go afterwards


21 posted on 07/22/2013 2:40:03 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

So I guess you never give them your grocery card to save the extra money on the purchase?


22 posted on 07/22/2013 4:12:16 PM PDT by willyd (I for one welcome our NSA overlords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson