Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Democrats & The GOP Both Agree To Have Presidential Primary Debates On Fox News?
8/6/2013 | Laissez-Faire Capitalist

Posted on 08/06/2013 3:37:28 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

Should Democrats have at least one presidential primary debate on Fox News? Will Republicans once agin have primary debates on Fox News, MSNBC and CNN, with Democrats only debating on CNN and MSNBC, but not Fox News?

And why not have both parties have one presidential debate (once each party has their nominee) on:

Fox News, MSNBC, CNN and finally Link TV (for a total of 4 presidential debates), where Link TV can rip into both political parties on the NSA program, interventionism, NAFTA, the federal reserve, etc?

Surely the Dem-e and GOP-e would love this...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2016elections; cnn; democrats; elections; foxnews; gop; hillary2016; hillarymovies; mediabias; msnbc; priebus; reincepriebus; republicans; teaparty

1 posted on 08/06/2013 3:37:29 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist; All

Now is the time to ask theses questions. This boulder moves slowly.

BTW, why not have New Hampshire’s GOP presidential primary closed for once?

Who is more open in their primaries, Dems or the GOP?


2 posted on 08/06/2013 3:39:09 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist; All

Will GOP candidates agree to one debate in a Tea Party presidential primary debate, with Dems having one presidential primary debate on Link TV?


3 posted on 08/06/2013 3:41:41 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

4 posted on 08/06/2013 3:45:36 PM PDT by Old Sarge (My "KMA List" is growing daily...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

If I were the Republican (or next major opposition) nominee, I would not agree to any “debates” under any circumstances.

I would consider an unmoderated live mutual Q&A session, but I probably would not agree to that, either.

I would try very hard not to involve myself in any events that were mediated through the LSM, at all.

Consider that Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomenei took over Iran and the head of a popular movement without ever setting foot in the country, while his name, image, and voice were banned, using only cassette tapes that were passed hand-to-hand.

We have a lot more resources to work with. We do not need, and should avoid, media events.


5 posted on 08/06/2013 3:48:16 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Why not a debate in Mexico City?


6 posted on 08/06/2013 3:51:05 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Why not a debate in Mexico City?


7 posted on 08/06/2013 3:51:08 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I would eliminate primary elections entirely, if I could. They have failed, again and again, to either identify or choose the best candidate.

If I could not eliminate them, I would limit the franchise to enrolled party members who had been enrolled continuously since the last Presidential election, and who could prove that they had donated either >$5000 or had given at least 625 volunteer hours to party organizations since the last Presidential election.

If I could do neither (and a lot of states have passed laws governing primaries), I would make sure that any delegate selected this way had no right to vote at the National Convention, which should be held no earlier than September 25-30 of the year of the election.


8 posted on 08/06/2013 3:53:55 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Isn't it possible to obtain independent, non-partisan moderators for all debates? Are there none available? Please, no more Candy Crowleys!
9 posted on 08/06/2013 4:05:12 PM PDT by luvbach1 (We are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Too hard for the ‘Rats to rig them.


10 posted on 08/06/2013 4:14:56 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Which debate (presidential or vice-presidential) will Mark Steyn be moderating?


11 posted on 08/06/2013 4:19:25 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

...as long as some flaming partisan liberal left wing communist sycophant (sp?) so called reporter has 15 minutes unfettered to kick the republican in the nuts repeatedly. (mccain will be ok with that a he has none)


12 posted on 08/06/2013 4:26:32 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

If they have it on FOX Juan Williams and Tamara Holder will be moderators.


13 posted on 08/06/2013 4:57:24 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (If you vote for evil because you can't see evil, you ARE evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

Two dim bulbs, Juan Williams and Tamara Holder.


14 posted on 08/06/2013 4:59:44 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Who cares?.. The next election will be stolen like the last one was... some people(republicans) never learn..
I propose that the republicans PRIMARYS were even FIXED...

WHO runs in the next presidential election WILL BE THE ONES chosen to be running.. (by some cabal)..

Unless someone can explain to me how conservatives REJECTED ALL conservative candidates(2012)...
In a believable way.. the republican primary’s were Kabuki Theater..

REALLY.... a KNOWN collaborator with democrats chosen for the Vichy ticket.. Pullllese..
MAYBE.. IF the 2010 elections didn’t JUST precede it.. BUT they DID!.


15 posted on 08/06/2013 5:05:12 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

No reason for a debate, it’ll be the latest RINO vs. Hillary. Birds of a feather.


16 posted on 08/06/2013 5:09:24 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Some of the Republicans I know that donated more than 5k or volunteered 625 hours think McCain is a hero and he only lost because of Palin.
We need to do 4 things to start our country on the right track.
1) Closed primaries. You can't change your party affiliation within 120day of a primary and your party affiliation changes based on what ballot you choose in the general.

2) Change the bylaws or structure of the Republican party so that we can throw the venomous traitorous louses out.

3) Basic campaign finance laws. You can't donate to anyone you can't vote for. That includes corporation, unions, trusts, whatever. If it's an entity that can't vote it can't donate.

4)We need to take back our party. It has been co-opted by liberals and we need to do it at the grass root, town and state level before we worry about national politics.

These changes would only stop the bleeding.

17 posted on 08/06/2013 7:16:36 PM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I don’t care where they have them,the only moderators I want to see are Rush Limbaugh,Mark Levin,Michael Savage.


18 posted on 08/07/2013 4:03:57 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Why should any repub appear on MSNBC? Nut case channel!


19 posted on 08/07/2013 4:10:09 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson