Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman Says Computer Tech Uploaded Her Nude Pictures to Web, Files Lawsuit
Opposing Views ^ | 08/14/2013 | By Michael Allen,

Posted on 08/14/2013 11:42:46 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd

University of Alabama student Nicole March claims that a member of Best Buy's Geek Squad posted her nude photos on the web after fixing her computer.

March has filed a lawsuit against Best Buy, claiming that she is "devastated and humiliated" by the incident.

Her lawyers claim the pictures were taken for an art project at school, where she was studying the human form.

According to March's lawsuit, she took her computer to a Best Buy store in Tuscaloosa, Alabama to fix the hard drive in August 2011. March also works at the same Best Buy.

However, in May of this year, she was told by a different Geek Squad worker that nude pictures of her were on the Internet, notes AL.com.

March's lawsuit claims an unidentified Geek Squad employee took the photos from her computer, uploaded them to the web and linked to the pictures via Pirate Bay, a popular bit torrent file-sharing site.

She complained to the police, but the statute of limitations had expired. She complained to Best Buy, whose manager identified the Geek Squad member, but would not tell March who it was.

Best Buy told March they would try to get the pictures off the web, but there is no guarantee they can.

March's lawsuit claims Best Buy invaded her privacy and was negligent in the supervision and training of its employees.

A Best Buy spokesperson said the company is waiting to see a copy of the lawsuit.

Source: AL.com

 


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: bestbuy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Responsibility2nd

You equate some bimbo posting nude pics of herself with SS records, tax records and birth “certs”?

<><><><

You are cracking me up. When the reality of the situation is not juicy enough, you simply make stuff up, exactly as you have done here.

The young woman in question posted exactly nothing of herself anywhere. They were on HER computer. It was the geek squad creep who did the posting.


21 posted on 08/14/2013 12:23:34 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

The jury is still out....


22 posted on 08/14/2013 12:27:11 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

just another reason to become your own tech master


23 posted on 08/14/2013 12:33:56 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I get your point. But “property” as you call it has a value. To place a 100,000 dollar value on nude pics being stolen is ludicrous.

Punitive damages are relative to the entity that is found guilty (liable) for the damage. It's punishment payment. I don't normally agree with punitive damage awards (like HOT McDonalds coffee). But the OJ Simpson Civil Trial seemed to fit the reason punitive awards exist. Precisely when no tangible value can be attributed to a loss, in this case personal private data. In the Simpson Civil Trial the damages were for what, that value of Nicole's life?

Personal photos are property per copyright law.

24 posted on 08/14/2013 12:34:47 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Waiting for next tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

or maybe just not do porn shoots in your spare time


25 posted on 08/14/2013 12:35:23 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

This is an accusation. Not one shred of evidence has been offered in the article.

According to the article, Ms. March allowed photos to be taken of her nude. No explanation is given about how those photos were protected or how their distribution has been traced to the Geek Squad member.

So all we have is “she said”.

Until credible evidence is presented, I will stay off the condemnation bandwagon.


26 posted on 08/14/2013 12:37:56 PM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
I don’t worry about my nude pictures getting out on the internet BECAUSE THERE AREN’T ANY!!!

Amen. No photos, no problem.

27 posted on 08/14/2013 12:38:39 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I would keep confidential data(or your nudie photos for that matter) either in encrypted files or better still stored on secure external media least your computer is hacked, lost, stolen or needs repairs. If she was attached to the college network without adequate firewall protection her photos may have been compromised too.


28 posted on 08/14/2013 12:40:22 PM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

There is also the fact that nobody would want to post (or view) naked pics of me if there were any.


29 posted on 08/14/2013 12:43:02 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

That’s my ultimate defense, too. If there were such pictures, who would care? Anyway, once you’ve given birth ten times, it’s like practically the whole state - well, three states - has seen you naked.


30 posted on 08/14/2013 12:46:17 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Ask me about the Weiner Wager. Support Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

The legalities as I understand them:

On your computer, they are your property, and a crime has been committed if someone takes and uploads them (hacking of Scarlett Johansson’s cell phone).

It is debatably a crime, depending on the jurisdiction, to hide a camera in a peephole and film someone getting naked (Erin Andrews...but in some other jurisdictions there was no specific law against this and prosecutors had trouble coming up with something to charge)

If you take naked pictures of yourself and give them to your honey, and later you break-up and you become rich and famous, he is free to sell them to a tabloid because you gave them as a gift and they are his property (Kristin Davis, Dr. Laura)


31 posted on 08/14/2013 1:01:36 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Personal photos are property per copyright law.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

No argument there. Way upthread I placed a $1 value on her stolen nudie pics. You placed a hundred thousand dollars.

Do you still hold on to that claim?


32 posted on 08/14/2013 1:06:15 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: knarf

bkmk


33 posted on 08/14/2013 1:19:15 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

You got to be kidding.


34 posted on 08/14/2013 1:33:50 PM PDT by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
I don’t worry about my nude pictures getting out on the internet BECAUSE THERE AREN’T ANY!!!

WOOOHOOOO MeganC!!! Smart women are so cool & hot & unassuming & under-represented & unappreciated in the culture. : )

35 posted on 08/14/2013 1:57:26 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
I don’t worry about my nude pictures getting out on the internet BECAUSE THERE AREN’T ANY!!!

Good to know that modesty and decency still exist in some places and some people!

36 posted on 08/14/2013 1:59:22 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade
Preferred method of HD disposal is the application of explosive material in one form or another, sometimes with the application of heavier metals.
37 posted on 08/14/2013 2:07:59 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Do you still hold on to that claim?

YES. I may have to retract my previous assumption about your intellect and wisdom as you seem to be incapable of grasping the meaning of punitive damages associated with civil lawsuits. I don't know how else to explain my opinion. Here is the definition of Punitive Damages....

Punitive Damages: Damages awarded in excess of compensation to the plaintiff to punish a defendant for a serious wrong.

www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/punitive%20damages

38 posted on 08/14/2013 2:38:39 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Waiting for next tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator

You’re ruining all the fun by applying common sense and restraint ;-)


39 posted on 08/14/2013 2:45:59 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Hmm, kartrashcan got rich the same way.


40 posted on 08/14/2013 3:48:00 PM PDT by bicyclerepair (Inbred, pedophile-worshipping, misogynists (mozlums) offend me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson