Posted on 08/17/2013 7:23:16 AM PDT by george76
It would take more than a handgun to stop (notice, I said "stop") a polar bear attack. Guides in Kodiak country often carry the Marlin 444 lever, or a lever action in 45-70.
Besides, at 1:30 in the AM, being dragged out of one's tent in a dead sleep, I don't think the meal is going to have any chance to grab any gun.
Are they sure it was a bear? Perhaps this was an Inuit bear guard, dressed in a bear suit, angry that he wasnt hired! (just joking here no flames, please)
///////
Very clever. Good laugh!
“Getting dragged off by a polar bear. Im surprised he survived.”
Your right, lucky for him all the bear wanted was the tent.
And just where did they do their business? Did they soil the biota with their own brand of DNA?
The excretions of a Sierra Clubber are naturally ecologically correct. Therefor they were at one with nature while being at one with nature...or something...
I thought they were friendly animals who like drinking Coca-Cola as depicted in the Coke commercial.
Ol Castaneda-Mendez must not be a very good safety conslutant. Deterrent does not mean barrier. It isn’t bear proof, fool.
“The bear fence advertisement said that it works as a deterrent,” he said. “There was no reason to believe that that wasn’t adequate.”
Castaneda-Mendez said he works as a safety consultant in the U.S. and has offered his service free of charge to Parks Canada and the outfitter his group used to help make changes to ensure appropriate safety policies are being executed.”
I don’t think his services would be worthwhile even if they were free.
Natural selection should have taken its course and we would be rid of these dopes. If there are any regulations that should change it would be to keep helicopters out of the park and tell people not to feed the bears.
I’d rather have a large caliber revolver under my pillow and then let the bear decide whether it wants to break off the attack.
I don’t need others telling me what won’t work.
Non-restricted firearms:
Most ordinary hunting rifles and shotguns. These may be brought temporarily into Canada for sporting or hunting use during hunting season, for use in competition, for in-transit movement through Canada, or for personal protection against wildlife in remote areas of Canada. Anyone wishing to bring hunting rifles into Canada must be at least 18 years old, and the firearm must be properly stored for transport.
http://canada.usembassy.gov/traveling_to_canada/bringing-weapons-into-canada.html
When the wife and I crossed the Rockies from Alberta to B.C. a few years ago, we saw a number of bears by the side of the road. Needless to say, we didn’t get out of the car and take a stroll into the woods.
Thank You!
This is my point, as sleeping with a rifle is a bit less useful than a powerful revolver. At least for the person in the case of this attack.
You might have thought that somebody in the group would have had a rifle with them.
So, your protests are moot, aren't they? And people who know firearms, know that no handgun caliber will stop a determined carnivore that happens to weigh in at around 3/4 ton. That's the polar bear.
My favorite handgun caliber is 44 mag, and even that caliber is inferior in ballistics to even the anemic (in the minds of most) 30-30 rifle.
The "what caliber handgun for bear" debate is constant. Somebody's always asking that over on The High Road or The Firing Line. And the conclusion is that if you go into brown or polar bear country armed with only a handgun, you'd better save that last bullet for yourself.
Canada Ping!
No, my protest is that Americans can’t take handguns into Canada.
I also made clear that I wasn’t suggesting a handgun would drop the bear in its tracks.
I simply believe there is a higher probability of the victim discouraging the bear, if he’d had a handgun under his pillow, than if he had to reach for a rifle and get it into position to take an effective shot.
Brought a grin to my ugly mug - when stationed in Italy and living downtown, the Itals had Vigilantes who got paid each month to watch over your car and home. Those that didn't hire them soon found out that no protection was like putting a neon sign on your house to beckon the crooks.
The mafia eventually took over and were more professional and friendly. They would actually give non-members a freebee and fill them in on the details of who they caught and what they were after. If you declined to pay after that, you were on your own.
My husband is certain that Anti-virus programs are sold by the people who create the viruses!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.