Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin Addresses Ted Cruz Eligibility Issue posed by Ridgewood, NJ Man at Book Signing
The Ridgewood Blog ^ | August 27, 2013 | PJBlogger

Posted on 08/27/2013 10:44:47 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey

Partial Transcript of the Mark Levin Show aired live on Monday, August 19, 2013

[start at 0:26 of the podcast recording]

Hello everybody, Mark Levin here, our number 877-381-3811, 877-381-3811.

Mark Levin: Before we jump in, all I can say is, Wow! You guys, open your microphones a second. Thousands of people at both booksignings. Wasn’t that unbelievable?

Staffer: There were a lot of people there, it was great.

Mark Levin: And the people were just spectacular, weren’t they? Except for one guy in New Jersey which I’ll talk about later.

Staffer: [chuckles]

Mark Levin: This… this birther stuff is way, way out of contr…”Now Ted Cruz” … I swear I almost hit this guy… “Ted Cruz is not a citizen!” No, he’s born to an American mother, no he’s born in Canada to an American mother. So all you pregnant ladies travelling overseas: According to certain birther, uh, groups, if you have a child while you are on vacation, they’re not Americans. They’re not natural-born Americans. I just thought you’d wanna know, if you were thinking of your kid as a potential presidential candidate, uh, because they say so. They have no historical background whatsoever… None! But it’s, it’s just amazing! Absolutely stunning! But we had so many wonderful people, and let me add, all races, both genders… I don’t know the sexual preferences, that wasn’t a requirement to say hello…young people, elderly, middle age people. A particularly young crowd, yeah, we had dogs come too, everybody so well behaved, and uh, it was a pleasure. In New York, we were there about four-and-a-half hours, in New Jersey about five, five-and-a-half hours, and I wanted to be respectful to everybody, so… I just want to thank you all, and this Saturday, Tyson’s Corner, Virginia, at Barnes and Noble. I should add, if you want to see the crowd that was at New York, Mr. Producer went down the line, and this was early on, this, this line kept growing and growing throughout the day…you can go look at uh MarkLevinShow.com on our website, as well as the social sites MarkLevinShow Facebook, MarkLevinShow Twitter. Um, Christians, Coptic Christians are being wiped out in Egypt. Their churches are being burned to the ground….

[stop at 3:01 of the podcast recording]

[restart at 59:22 of the podcast recording]

Mark Levin: Alright, lets go to uh, Steve in New York, the great WABC, go!

Steve: Great one, it’s great to talk to you, what an honor.

Mark Levin: My honor, thank you, my friend.

Steve: Oh, I got a great story for you, I loved your uh, Hannity special, I enjoyed it very much, I listened to it three times over the weekend…

Mark Levin: Oh, thank you.

Steve: …I got my wife, I got my wife to tape for me, or TIVO it, and she watched it. And she really enjoyed it. She’s not big on politics or anything, and she gets sick of hearing me talk about it, but it was funny ‘cause she said “He is so calm, Steve.” He was, she was trying to do a little wifey/husband training? And…

Mark Levin: Uh huh.

Steve: she said “He is so calm, and he gets his point across. He didn’t raise his voice, or get upset…

Mark Levin: [chuckles]

Steve: …or anything!”

Mark Levin: [breaks out into laughter]

Steve: …and I laughed so hard. I said “How do you, uh, where do you think I learned how to yell?” [laughs] “I just listen to Mark.” And she knows you’re my hero, I go around quotin’ ya, and tellin’ everybody to listen to ya, and…

Mark Levin: Well, that’s great.

Steve: she just … to get me to calm down a little, and I said you just need to listen to Mark. [laughs]

Mark Levin: Well, thank you, uh…well listen, you know what, this is called passion, just remind her it’s passion, you know, and um…what was truly exceptional about the Hannity program, number one, the man has enormous class and decency, and number two, he was asking me questions because he wanted me to inform the public about what I’d written, and to engage the studio audience. And notice we didn’t have a bunch of left-wing bomb throwers just yelling and talking over people. There were conversations actually occurring, did you notice that?

Steve: Yes, there was no crazy, I mean a lot of times he’s got the left wingers on there, and it’s just, kind, it’s almost funny to watch, but that was so interesting and…and it didn’t get me upset, and it just, I just wanted to listen to it over and over and absorb every second of it, and every bit of information, it…it’s just brilliant, Mark, I, you know I hope when um…we’ve got President Cruz, he has the wisdom to make you his chief of staff or vice-president.

Mark Levin: No, no no no no no. And he’s got a great chief of staff, by the way. No, I…I do what I do, and uh, and he will do a great job should he be president. Thank you for your call my friend. And uh, I’m so sick of these birthers. I was going to tell you about this, uh, incident. Just a wonderful group of people, uh, we were in Bookends, Ridgewood, New Jersey, and everyone was respectful until…and it was hot outside, it got hot, hotter than uh originally forecast and it was a very long line, and you know we try to go through it quickly out of respect for everybody in line, but I also try to be respectful to everybody in line. Um…but this fella [breathes out] gets in my face and first of all he points to some obscure note on page I don’t know whatever and he said [cough] excuse me folks, and he says “You were wrong about this, you were wrong about”, and honestly I, I, I didn’t have time to read it, and I’ll go back and check it, if I’m wrong about it I’ll fix it, and that happens sometimes in these books when you’re going into the notes, you might put a word when you mean another word, or a state when you mean another state, so I’m going to check it out, I just haven’t had time. And then he goes, he says uh “And Ted Cruz is not eligible to be president. He’s not a natural-born Citizen.” And I thought to myself, you know I, this is not a subject that I have studied so thoroughly, but he’s born of a mother who is an American citizen. Doesn’t that make him a natural-born Ci… “No, but he was in Canada when he was born!” Okay, but she wasn’t Canadian, she was an American citizen! She was an American citizen. And so, the issue isn’t what the Constitution says in that regard, the issue is how do we interpret that. And the way I interpret it is, his mother’s an American citizen, so he’s an American citizen! That’s not a constitutional issue, that’s an interpretive issue… or, a statutory issue if Congress has passed some law subsequent to that to enforce that provision of the Constitution. So, the face of the Constitution isn’t terribly helpful. If he was born of non-citizens in a foreign country that would be easy, and there’s a lot of easy cases. So the guy gets in my face, and he starts pointing and pointing, and I looked at him and I pointed back, and I cursed, unfortunately, but the, because, uh you know, he was…he was a nutjob. And I thought to myself: Why do you come here and do that? Is this, is this sort of the way you…you excite yourself or something? No. So, I just want you folks to know who like Ted Cruz. I…I assume they’re going to do this to Rubio, or some of these other people too, whether you like ‘em or not for president I’m just making a point, but now this has become an entire industry. And of course [chuckles] Ted Cruz [laughs], he immediately issued today or yesterday his long form birth certificate. Now, some of this is probably coming from the left. So now they’re the birthers. But some of it’s coming from others, too. People just get obsessed, or conspiratorial, and there’s no end to it, on a matter like this, and there’s nothing I can say or point to that’s going to change their mind. But in my view there’s no doubt about it that he’s eligible for president, should he choose to run, just as I believe McCain was eligible for president, when he ran. So…that’s my opinion! You may not like it… But what particularly bothered me about this guy…he was disrespectful in his conduct to everybody else standing there. They were pleasant, talking to each other, you know…listening, watching and so forth. I’m a big boy; I’ve seen this and a thousand times worse. But he was quite obnoxious. He’s the only one…oh no there was another guy, had a prob, wha wha, he what…he had a problem, he was screaming upstairs, I don’t know what he was screamin’ about. It was kind of eventful there in New Jersey. No, there wasn’t anything like that in New York, was there boys? [Staff: No. Peaceful in ji…you know in Long Island] It was peaceful on Long Island! [chuckles] But is was peaceful in New Jersey, too. It really, really was. It was just terrific. If you could have seen that line, well, actually you can. We have the uh video, and this is just the start of the day with the line. It got longer and longer at uh… at Book Review in Long Island if you want to take a look on MarkLevinShow.com or MarkLevi…oh there is now? The…the New Jersey line? Okay. Both lines. On MarkLevinShow.com, are they both on the social sites too? Or…just the Long Island. But we’ll put the other one up later so some of you can see yourselves, too. Alright. GoldLine!

[stop at 67:00 of the podcast recording]

(further information and videos at: http://queenofliberty.com/2013/08/14/mark-levin-rolls-out-his-new-book/)


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Society
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; citizenship; congress; cruz; cruzmissle; electionfraud; eligibility; fraud; govtabuse; jr4cruz; levin; libertyamendments; marklevin; mediabias; naturalborncitizen; randsconcerntrolls; talkradio; teaparty; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 551-586 next last
A man posed the issue of Ted Cruz's presidential ineligibilty to Mark Levin at a booksigning event at Bookends in Ridgewood, New Jersey on Sunday, August 18th. Mark uses the occasion of his live radio broadcast the next day to discuss the matter. A local Ridgewood Blog picked up on the story. Do his comments ring true to fellow Freepers?
1 posted on 08/27/2013 10:44:47 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

Cruz has a Canadian birth certificate. The original intent of the “natural born” requirement for presidents was so that they would not have divided allegiances.

Cruz was born a dual citizen of the US and Canada. According to the original intent of the framers, he is disqualified.


2 posted on 08/27/2013 10:52:04 AM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

Welcome to FR! Food for the nativist trolls around here?


3 posted on 08/27/2013 10:53:12 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark; C. Edmund Wright
Ted Cruz for POTUS ping. Mark Levin offers his services as his Constitutional attorney.

On his daily broadcast, Levin explained that he was “so sick of these birthers” after one man, in a hot line at a New Jersey book signing, “gets in my face, points to an obscure note … and says you were wrong about this.” On Cruz? “In my mind there’s no doubt about it. He’s eligible should he choose to run.”

4 posted on 08/27/2013 10:57:12 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

May the good Lord help and protect me for my rash disregard of all prudence and circumspection...and possibly of any vestige of sanity too, in daring to enter, even for just a quick moment, this contentious issue here again. I just bowed out of another FR discussion about it because I definitely didn’t, and don’t, have the time to pursue it.

But alas...one quick comment....Psalm 23... Psalm 23....


The good Mark Levin was right when he qualified his conversation by pointing out this is an issue he has not studied.....

as Mr. Levin said,
“And I thought to myself, you know I, this is not a subject that I have studied so thoroughly, but he’s born of a mother who is an American citizen. Doesn’t that make him a natural-born Ci… “No, but he was in Canada when he was born!” Okay, but she wasn’t Canadian, she was an American citizen! She was an American citizen. And so, the issue isn’t what the Constitution says in that regard, the issue is how do we interpret that. And the way I interpret it is, his mother’s an American citizen, so he’s an American citizen!”

We agree. Mr. Levin has patently not studied this issue.
We agree, Senator Cruz is an American citizen.
But that is not the issue, Mr. Levin.
The issue is whether he can possibly qualify as a Natural Born Citizen. As they say, that’s a Horse of A Different Color.

OK, I’m so far out of this thread now that even Beep Beep the RoadRunner can’t catch my dust.

Bye........


5 posted on 08/27/2013 11:04:49 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross; xzins; onyx; txhurl; Timber Rattler
Maybe Levin has been reading our posts........

:-)

6 posted on 08/27/2013 11:12:38 AM PDT by Lakeshark (KILL THE BILL! CALL. FAX. WRITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Triple

What a lack of logic you have. What divided loyalties does Ted Cruz have? Tell me.

Let’s suppose this is a different scenario that has zero connection to Obama: Which I suspect is partly the reason for the birther crap on Cruz (gotta be consistent right?). I’ll make up an example for you to follow. A French baby is born while the mom is in America. She’s a wife whose husband has a job in our country. Soon they go home. Because our law (like Canada’s) confers citizenship automatically on the child, this baby is a dual citizen. The kid lives in France the vast majority of his life and becomes active in French politics. Assume said person has zero record of indicating any allegiance to America. Should his loyalty to France be suspect?


7 posted on 08/27/2013 11:13:56 AM PDT by BJ1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Triple

Cruz has a Canadian birth certificate. The original intent of the “natural born” requirement for presidents was so that they would not have divided allegiances.

Cruz was born a dual citizen of the US and Canada. According to the original intent of the framers, he is disqualified.


This ^


8 posted on 08/27/2013 11:16:07 AM PDT by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

Nobody here as far as I know has said Ted cruz is not an American citizen..

although he was born in another country, his mother was an American citizen, and at least 19 years old...

Ted Cruz was born an American citizen...

the question is “Is he eligible to be president of the United States since he is not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”...

besides being born in another country his father was not an American citzen at the time of his birth...

If Obama who was born in the US but also without an American citizen father could be said to be ineligible even if he had been born in the Lincoln bedroom, how does Ted Cruz who was born in another country get a pass ???

This has not been acceptably explained in these threads...

Either there is no case for Obama to be ineligible..

or Ted Cruz is also ineligible...

We cant have it both ways...

Even McCain with his overseas birth to TWO American citizen parents and his father stationed overseas in the US military had to prove his eligibility through the Senate to be POTUS...

and Ted Cruz did nopt have both parents as American citizens with a father in the US military sent there by our government..

When I was in the US military and arrived at a US base overseas I was told to go back to the US for any births of children so they would be eligible to be POTUS...

this was 1975...5 years after Ted Cruz was born...

I knew that my son born the year before in the US was not eigible to be POTUS...

I was not an American citizen at the time and was not naturalized as an American citizen until he was 8 months old..

you can argue until you are blue in the face but that was the law when my son was born in 1974...

So if Obama is not eligible, neither is Ted Cruz...

these laws are not a smoresborg...

they are the same for everyone...


9 posted on 08/27/2013 11:19:17 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

Signs up today, posts one article and then doesn’t answer any of the posts. Looks like zotbait to me.


10 posted on 08/27/2013 11:21:40 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Uncle Miltie: Obama poisoned race relations for a generation. Everything is racial now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

http://birthers.org/USC/Vattel.html

Everyone should read this and absorb it. It’s really quite simple.


11 posted on 08/27/2013 11:24:18 AM PDT by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nesnah

what does it say ???


12 posted on 08/27/2013 11:26:36 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nesnah; Jeff Winston
You should read and absorb this. It's really quite simple.

"It is not necessary that a man should be born in this country, to be 'a natural born citizen.' It is only requisite that he should be a citizen by birth, and that is the case with all the children of citizens who have ever resided in this country, though born in a foreign country." ... James Bayard, A Brief Exposition of the Constitution of the United States (1833)

p.s. There’s not the slightest damn evidence anywhere that the Framers of the Constitution gave Vattel any more credence on the “definition” of citizenship than they did on his views that only the elites and the military should be allowed to keep and bear arms.

13 posted on 08/27/2013 11:28:55 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

The Cliff Notes version very clearly indicates that a “natural born citizen” is one born in a country whose parents are both citizens of that country. No chance whatsoever of foreign allegiance or sympathy AT ALL.

That last sentence was the defining intent of the term.

As a disclaimer, I do absolutely LOVE Ted Cruz and think him an amazing Senator.

But, we gotta be consistent.


14 posted on 08/27/2013 11:29:38 AM PDT by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BJ1

Yes - The baby is a dual citizen. France is free to deal with that split allegiance as France pleases.

In the US we impose a very limited restriction on citizens that may have divided loyalty - They just can’t be President.

Have a nice day.


15 posted on 08/27/2013 11:29:55 AM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana; one guy in new jersey
I knew that my son born the year before in the US was not eigible to be POTUS...

I was not an American citizen at the time and was not naturalized as an American citizen until he was 8 months old..

you can argue until you are blue in the face but that was the law when my son was born in 1974...


Please take this in the respect I mean it in. Your "knowledge" notwithstanding.

Same question TNana I've been asking everyone else:

Show me in the US Constitution where your opinion/position/knowledge is codified that it takes 2 parents that are US Citizens for a newborn to be "Natural Born".

Lacking that, please provide the relevant US Law(s) passed by Congress and signed by a US President that codifies your understanding/opinion/knowledge that it takes 2 parents that are US Citizens for a newborn to be "Natural Born".

Lacking that, please point us to the relevant US Supreme Court decision/ruling that proves that it takes 2 parents that are US Citizens for a newborn to be "Natural Born".
16 posted on 08/27/2013 11:30:41 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BJ1; Triple
"What a lack of logic you have. What divided loyalties does Ted Cruz have? Tell me."

While he doesn't display, or act on divided loyalites...he most certainly owes allegiance to Cananda [1][2].

17 posted on 08/27/2013 11:30:42 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross; onyx; xzins
I just can't help myself....


18 posted on 08/27/2013 11:32:29 AM PDT by Lakeshark (KILL THE BILL! CALL. FAX. WRITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Triple
Cruz has a Canadian birth certificate. The original intent of the “natural born” requirement for presidents was so that they would not have divided allegiances.

Cruz was born a dual citizen of the US and Canada. According to the original intent of the framers, he is disqualified.


Show me in the US Constitution where your opinion/position/knowledge is codified that it takes 2 parents that are US Citizens for a newborn to be "Natural Born".

Lacking that, please provide the relevant US Law(s) passed by Congress and signed by a US President that codifies your understanding/opinion/knowledge that it takes 2 parents that are US Citizens for a newborn to be "Natural Born".

Lacking that, please point us to the relevant US Supreme Court decision/ruling that proves that it takes 2 parents that are US Citizens for a newborn to be "Natural Born".
19 posted on 08/27/2013 11:33:39 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Show me in the US Constitution where your opinion/position/knowledge is codified that it takes 2 parents that are US Citizens for a newborn to be “Natural Born”.

Lacking that, please provide the relevant US Law(s) passed by Congress and signed by a US President that codifies your understanding/opinion/knowledge that it takes 2 parents that are US Citizens for a newborn to be “Natural Born”.

Lacking that, please point us to the relevant US Supreme Court decision/ruling that proves that it takes 2 parents that are US Citizens for a newborn to be “Natural Born”.


All three questions could be asked in reverse as well. That’s why this is such an important discussion.


20 posted on 08/27/2013 11:34:14 AM PDT by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nesnah
All three questions could be asked in reverse as well. That’s why this is such an important discussion.

It is an important question, but as the law currently stands today, he's eligible, you may argue that the law is unconstitutional from an original intent perspective, but that does not mean he is not eligible.

That can all change with one lawsuit ruled upon by the US Supreme court or one law passed by Congress and signed by Zero.
21 posted on 08/27/2013 11:36:54 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Congress and Zero cannot amend the Constitution by themselves.


22 posted on 08/27/2013 11:38:02 AM PDT by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nesnah

If his mother had returned and he had been born in the US tyhere might be an argument since the presidence has been set by Obama born in the US with a foreign father ...

but Ted has 2 strikes against him...more than even Obama has...

meanwhile any illegal alien anchor baby born in the US with 2 illegal alien parents not under the jurisdiction of..can be president of the United states, a country he/she has no alleigence to but a proven disrespect instead ???


23 posted on 08/27/2013 11:38:13 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nesnah
There is no court decision anywhere since George Washington was President, no precedent anywhere that makes these birther opinions law.

No where. Just gobbledy gook on the internet and from birther mouths. Levin is right, they're nuts.

Cruz was given the birth certificate without needing naturalization. he is a US citizen from birth. He IS a natural born citizen until some idiot birther wins a court case against him.

Good luck with that.......

24 posted on 08/27/2013 11:39:16 AM PDT by Lakeshark (KILL THE BILL! CALL. FAX. WRITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Tennessee Nana; one guy in new jersey
"Show me in the US Constitution where your opinion/position/knowledge is codified that it takes 2 parents that are US Citizens for a newborn to be "Natural Born". "

The Constitution wasn't written as a dictionary, save for Article III, Section III. You must look "elsewhere" to find their intent.

"Lacking that, please provide the relevant US Law(s) passed by Congress and signed by a US President that codifies your understanding/opinion/knowledge that it takes 2 parents that are US Citizens for a newborn to be "Natural Born". "

Congress does not have the Constitutional authority to define a "natural born Citizen." They only have the power of naturalization.

"Lacking that, please point us to the relevant US Supreme Court decision/ruling that proves that it takes 2 parents that are US Citizens for a newborn to be "Natural Born"."

No SCOTUS case has ever been heard, and decided, regrading the "natural born Citizen" requirement for the office of Commander in Chief.

25 posted on 08/27/2013 11:39:23 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Triple; BJ1
In the US we impose a very limited restriction on citizens that may have divided loyalty - They just can’t be President.

Do not confuse the issues of your understanding of original intent and the current eligibility of Ted Cruz to be POTUS.

They are two completely separate issues.

There are no US Laws or US Supreme Court rulings that support your position and it is not clearly defined in the US Constitution.

This is your opinion, and as of today, it is not a legally defined term that has been codified into US law.
26 posted on 08/27/2013 11:40:06 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

“It is an important question, but as the law currently stands today, he’s eligible....”


Huh? There is NO law that defines NBC. You made that point in your 3 questions post.

The reason we’re discussing it here is because nobody knows for sure what NBC really is, but many have strong opinions one way or another.


27 posted on 08/27/2013 11:40:30 AM PDT by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Original intent does not have to have been ruled on by the supreme court to exist.

The original intent was very plainly placed in the constitution - No divided loyalties for those holding the office of President.

Do you claim that there was some other original intent?


28 posted on 08/27/2013 11:41:24 AM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nesnah

Why would they have to amend the constitution?

There is no reason they could not pass a law that fits within the broad terms of “Natural Born” and then the US Supreme Court could weigh in.


29 posted on 08/27/2013 11:41:43 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Tennessee Nana

Quite correct, SoConPubbie - the Constitution does not define what “natural born citizen” means, nothing in U.S. Code that deals with citizenship differentiates citizenship at birth from “natural born” citizenship in any fashion, and the only relevant case law says that citizen at birth is the same as “natural born”.

Where the Obama case is different is that his mother’s status at the time of his birth may not have automatically granted him citizenship if he was not born inside the United States (there has been some argument over exactly what the law was at the time, and I have not seen the end result of that argument).

McCain, of course, was born to two citizen parents, so even though it was outside the country, he was a citizen at birth and by the reasons above, a natural-born citizen.

Cruz’s case is the most like the proposed Obama case (assuming birth outside the US), but there can be no dispute that he is a citizen by birth because his mother’s status clearly passes the test (residing in the US for a minimum of 10 years and minimum 5 after age 14) that was in place at the time, so Cruz is also a natural-born citizen.


30 posted on 08/27/2013 11:42:52 AM PDT by kevkrom (It's not "immigration reform", it's an "amnesty bill". Take back the language!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Why would they have to amend the constitution?

There is no reason they could not pass a law that fits within the broad terms of “Natural Born” and then the US Supreme Court could weigh in.


Using that logic, the Congress and POTUS could pass a law redefining what an “arm” is and take away all the guns.

Geezus.......


31 posted on 08/27/2013 11:44:46 AM PDT by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Triple
Original intent does not have to have been ruled on by the supreme court to exist.

The original intent was very plainly placed in the constitution - No divided loyalties for those holding the office of President.

Do you claim that there was some other original intent?


Let us be clear in this discussion, Original Intent does not and cannot imply legality.

Stating that a person cannot be President if both parents were not citizens at time of birth is not legally correct, it maybe correct from an original intent perspective, but there are no laws, clearly stated, that support that contention, either from the US Constition, Laws passed by Congress, or rulings by the Supreme Court.

Depending on which founders/early leaders you are referencing, you can come up with more than one version of original intent on this issue.

Trying to state that this issue is settled and implying that legally that a person cannot be President without two US Citizens as parents is neither correct, and for purposes of an honest discussion, needs to cease.
32 posted on 08/27/2013 11:45:23 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey; Jim Robinson; xzins; onyx; Lakeshark; Windflier; Servant of the Cross; ...

I will continue to propose that ANYONE who uses this forum to propagate the stupid idea that Ted Cruz is not a Natural Born Citizen according to the constitution be banned from this forum.

There is no truer Natural Born American than Ted Cruz in the Government today. Anyone using this forum as a means of tearing down this man or insulting the rest of the forum with stupid vapid arguments about whether or not Ted Cruz is “eligible” should be treated as a DU or MSM plant and be shown the door.

There is always a point at which one must draw a line in the sand. This is that point.


33 posted on 08/27/2013 11:45:51 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey
Now, some of this is probably coming from the left. So now they’re the birthers. But some of it’s coming from others, too. People just get obsessed, or conspiratorial, and there’s no end to it, on a matter like this, and there’s nothing I can say or point to that’s going to change their mind.

Yes, now the anti-Cruz leftists can take the birther baton from the anti-Obama birthers and continue with the race. The transition should be smooth because a lot of historical research has already been completed and neatly organized for this new crop of birthers.

In the end, the voters and their electors will once again decide the issue and Cruz will "lose" only those voters he could never have gotten anyway.

34 posted on 08/27/2013 11:46:25 AM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Triple

Agree with you. The crux of the issue — the requirement for the President to be a natural-born citizen — is that he (or she) have no allegiance to any other country. Neither parent being at the time of birth a citizen of another country, not born in another country, not self-identifying as a foreign student to slip into an ivy-league school, and also not accepting any honorary or dual citizenship of another country.

As much as I appreciate and respect Ted Cruz, I do not believe he meets the requirement. However, I will vote for him if the alternative is any Democrat.... for the good of the country.


35 posted on 08/27/2013 11:47:09 AM PDT by mason-dixon (As Mason said to Dixon, you have to draw the line somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Thank you.

If Ted Cruz runs, I will fall over myself running to the voting booth so I can cast my ballot for him.


36 posted on 08/27/2013 11:49:21 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Support Christian white males----the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

Two issues here: where you are born and to whom; and the issue of loyalty vs citizenship.

Let’s address the latter first, because that really hangs people up. Citizenship can be conferred automatically. We must never interpret the constitution to mean that no one with a dual citizenship is eligible. Tomorrow Jamaica could make a candidate a citizen and poof, his candidacy is over. Dual citizenship is thus meaningless as a disqualifier.

Hopefully it would be difficult in these technological times to hide that a candidate spent 5-10 years outside our country, voting, involved in his host country’s government. Even as an American citizen, one hopes that his loyalty would be questioned and he would not be chosen as a serious candidate. That would be an example of divided loyalty. Yes, president Obama is borderline on that account, and much of his past has been obscured.

Back to the first point: where you are born and to whom. In 1961, and possibly today (?), the law of the land was that an American woman giving birth outside the country had to have lived 5 years after the age of 15 in the USA to be able to confer her citizenship onto her baby. This is what birthers are all about.

We have never seen an actual, non-forged proof that Barack Obama was born in the USA.

When she was a 17 year old girl “in trouble,” in 1961 with a baby of a different race, she could easily have gone where her Seattle school chums in such positions went. They popped over the border into Canada to the unwed mother homes run by either the Salvation Army or the Catholic Church. Usually they gave the babies up for adoption. She was not old enough to confer citizenship.

She may have changed her mind about giving up her mixed race baby, because within a month of his birth, she was alone with a little baby she didn’t know how to care for, enrolled in the university in Seattle. (She was never seen pregnant in Hawaii. She never ever lived with Barack Obama Senior.).

These are the two different questions raised by foreign birth or loyalty.

Ted Cruz was born outside the country to a woman eligible to confer citizenship. As was John McCain. No one knows where Barack Obama was born, and that is all birthers want to know.


37 posted on 08/27/2013 11:53:03 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
I will continue to propose that ANYONE who uses this forum to propagate the stupid idea that Ted Cruz is not a Natural Born Citizen according to the constitution be banned from this forum.

Personally, I think Ted Cruz would pass muster with the Founding Fathers with flying colors. His heart and mind are unquestioningly aligned with, and welded to this country and its Founding Ideals.

My view is that the Framers inserted the NBC clause to guard against those with divided loyalties from ever assuming the office of President. That was a wise thing to do on their part, but it was only a stop gap measure, meant to filter out those least likely to bear such an innate loyalty to America.

They couldn't know that one day, a person like Barack Obama, who shows little evidence of the desired loyalty to this country and its ideals, would one day lay claim to eligibility to the office through a tenuous connection of birth - or that a man such as Ted Cruz, who, though being born outside this country to just one American citizen parent, would be so superior in loyalty and love for this country.

Put them both before the Framers with resumes in hand, and there's no doubt that one would pass, and the other would fail their test.

All that said, there can be no doubt that there is a case to be made regarding Ted Cruz' technical eligibility to hold that office. Instead of firing cannons at those who bring up those points, I think it would be better to do your best to convince them through reason and logic.

38 posted on 08/27/2013 12:00:22 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

Freerepublis Thread about “Concern Trolls”;
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2594943/posts


39 posted on 08/27/2013 12:02:02 PM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food; P-Marlowe; JRandomFreeper; xzins; onyx; Jim Robinson; Servant of the Cross
Yes, now the anti-Cruz leftists can take the birther baton from the anti-Obama birthers and continue with the race. The transition should be smooth because a lot of historical research has already been completed and neatly organized for this new crop of birthers.

One thing to understand is the MSM has telegraphed its intent to use this issue against Cruz. 12 stories in 2 days by the Washington Post is a clear sign they think they can cause a deep division, perhaps enough to prevent him from running, or winning if he runs. I don't believe this is an issue that can be allowed by conservatives to take one of our best candidates out. It's one (among many) of the battles we will have to help Cruz fight if he runs and if so, when he wins the nomination.

The power of the MSM/democrat complex is looming on this one, it's clear they mean to use it. The amount of people who are drawn in by this nonsense, many of whom I have some respect for in other areas is disturbing.

40 posted on 08/27/2013 12:04:05 PM PDT by Lakeshark (KILL THE BILL! CALL. FAX. WRITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Obanma was raised in Indonesia as a devoted Moslem and indoctrinated in a Moslem public school...

his father and he had to be Moslems for him to be accepted in the boys only school..

after years of that unAmertican brainwashing is it any wonder that Obama acting as that-guy-in-my-White-house TM does not have the best interests of the United States at heart but the advancement ofr hisd Moslem brethern ???
He is about to get us into a war with Syria against Christians and moderate Moslems to give aid and comfort to our enemies the Islamic terrorists, the rebels who just murdered 1,00 of their fellow Syrians...

his sworn loyalty and alleigence is with the ideology of Islam and not with the United States...

no problem of divided loyalty there at all...

this is the kind of thing the Founders wanted to protect us from...

During the 1600s and 1700s in the early American colonies there were several wars with the Indians, the French and finally with the English...

they were friends or enemies at different times of that history...

The governors of the colonies were usually some lord born in England put there by the English with loyalty to the English crown...

They had no alleigence to the colonies which they considered ignorant and less than trailor trash ...

the real world was back in London...

during the American revolution they sided with England against the American colonists ...

To avoid having a president who had divided loyalties like those governors but would be faithful to the United States alone and consider the American people before all others, there is a need for a true Natural born American to be the leader of our country...

Born in the US of TWO American citizen parents “under the jurisdiction of” the Constitution...

there are millions of people who fit that requirement whats so hard ???

or we continue to get what we have now...

about to get in a war with Syria a country that has not proven to be a threat to us and to aid and arm the Moslem Brotherhood against innocent Syrian Christians and friendly Moslems......


41 posted on 08/27/2013 12:06:26 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nesnah
The Cliff Notes version very clearly indicates that a “natural born citizen” is one born in a country whose parents are both citizens of that country.

Well, that's the problem with Cliff Notes. A superficial review can lead to poor conclusions. As in this case.

Please provide a citation for that assertion, either from the Constitution itself or from relevant federal law.
42 posted on 08/27/2013 12:07:35 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Triple; holdonnow; onyx; trisham; TheOldLady; DJ MacWoW; RedMDer; musicman; Lady Jag; Alamo-Girl; ..

Ted Cruz was born to an American mother. He’s a natural born citizen and patriot in every sense of the word and I will support him to the hilt if he decides to run and is the strongest conservative running!! In fact, if that happens, FR will be Cruz Country!!

Go, TED, GO!!

FU Tokyo Rove, Chris Cristy, Jeb Bush, McCain, McBoehner, McGrahammesty, McFlake, McConnell and ALL GOP-e RINOS!!

The tea party rebellion is on!!

Anyone can’t live with that (as the say in Russia) tough shitski!!


43 posted on 08/27/2013 12:08:35 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle; one guy in new jersey
"Tomorrow Jamaica could make a candidate a citizen and poof, his candidacy is over. "

That's a straw man argument.

Heck, if you play that game, the U.S. could then turn around and make all Jamaican citizens, U.S. citizens. If such a thing were viable, it would have been done long ago, and the actions would have stood the test of time (See War of 1812).

Such a move would not be internationally recognized and therefore would be unenforceable, even inside Jamaica, which would find itself internationally isolated (in the very least) if it did try to enforce such action.

44 posted on 08/27/2013 12:09:24 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nesnah
http://birthers.org/USC/Vattel.html

Just read it and understand better than ever, the issue.

Interpretted literaly, neither Obama nor Cruz should be POTUS.

Who could imagine this conundrum?

Enforcement or lack of enforcement of the law should be consistant.

If Cruz does nothing else, he forces the media to face the issue.

Of course, neither should be POTUS is the preferred solution.

45 posted on 08/27/2013 12:10:12 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

So what does Levin think about obama’s eligibility?


46 posted on 08/27/2013 12:10:35 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (When you vote for evil because you can't see evil, you ARE evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highball

Maybe we can have a discussion on the “Intent” and “True Meaning” of the Commerce Clause?

We here all know how that’s been bastardized. Are we to do the same thing again?


47 posted on 08/27/2013 12:11:10 PM PDT by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

So what’s your opinion of the issue? We haven’t heard back from you.


48 posted on 08/27/2013 12:13:59 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Support Christian white males----the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

Not much. He used to hang up on people who tried to discuss the issue on his radio talk show.


49 posted on 08/27/2013 12:18:44 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Bump that.


50 posted on 08/27/2013 12:19:18 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 551-586 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson