[Heartlander]

I had to explain why ID can be an alternative to materialism (obvious to anyone) – why ID is not the same as creationism (even though the first sentence of the article stated they are not the same) – and then you refuse to answer a question that is clearly related to the subject.
I've allowed you to waste far too much of my time...

[tacticalogic]

I had to explain why ID can be an alternative to materialism (obvious to anyone)

You tried to remove all the possibilities from ID except theological creationism, and maintain that you can still call it ID.

If you mean "creationism", then say "creationism".