Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan

No, it is not so accepted. Don’t fall for the liberal spin. Only liberal churches “accept” it.


25 posted on 09/20/2013 6:17:33 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

Don’t buy that.

Sexually active homosexuals would not be welcome at many conservative churches.

Sexually active unmarried heterosexuals I think few would bat an eye. In my lifetime the term “dating” has changed from primarily meaning socializing and courtship to random one-night stands.

How many churches today make any attempt to discipline members who divorce, regardless of the cause? Even though Christ spoke against divorce, but said nothing that has been recorded about homosexuality.

BTW, I’m not in favor of “gay rights.” I just think the Bible classifies homosexuality as one of many sexual sins, in which they are roughly equal in sinfulness except for special characteristics.

Of these, the unnatural nature of homosexuality and incest makes them worse than “normal” fornication. The abusive nature of pedophilia makes it worse. And the betrayal aspect of adultery makes it worse.

But all sexual sins fall under the general term “porneia” or fornication.


32 posted on 09/20/2013 10:09:12 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Mark Steyn: "In the Middle East, the enemy of our enemy is also our enemy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson