Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Los Angeles Renews Efforts To Get One, Possibly Two NFL Teams
CBSLA.com) ^ | September 24, 2013 6:31 PM

Posted on 09/24/2013 8:44:17 PM PDT by BenLurkin

LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — A resolution, uring the NFL to bring back at least one, or possibly two teams to Los Angeles, has been backed by the Los Angeles City Council’s Economic Development Committee.

The resolution is now ready to go before the full City Council.

Councilman Tom LaBonge, the author of the resolution, said it “puzzles me why, out of 32 teams, one doesn’t want to come here to sunny Southern California.”

LaBonge’s resolution declares interest in making Los Angeles a two-team city, while local football enthusiasts have struggled getting even one team to stay.

Brian McCarthy, a spokesman for the NFL, said that the league is keeping its eye on Los Angeles.

“We continue to closely monitor all stadium developments in the Los Angeles area,” McCarthy said.

LaBonge, meanwhile, has stated that his “real hope is the league expands” from 32 to 34 teams, allowing Los Angeles to get its own team or teams, rather than getting teams from other cities.

The St. Louis Rams, the Oakland Raiders and the San Diego Chargers are all considered likely candidates to relocate due to the idea that they may be interested in upgrading their stadium facilities.

All three of those teams are former residents of Los Angeles.

The Chargers played in Los Angeles in 1960 during the team’s first season as part of the American Football League.

When LaBonge was asked whether he would welcome the Raiders back to Los Angeles, he joked that he would, as long as several former Raiders from the 1980s, including Marcus Allen and Howie Long, are called out of retirement.

LaBonge addressed a letter to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell in early September urging an end to an 18-season NFL drought in Los Angeles.

In his missive, LaBonge professed his deep love for football and suggested it’s time to “call an audible” after years of unfulfilled plans.

“We’ve waited far too long to root for the home team” LaBonge said of the renewed efforts to show the NFL the city’s enthusiasm for football.

“Our collective excitement for the new NFL season is dampened by Los Angeles’ lack of a team.”

Los Angeles has been without an NFL team since 1994. In 1995, the Los Angeles Raiders returned to Oakland, after occupying the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum near USC from 1982 to 1994, and the Los Angeles Rams, who played in Anaheim Stadium, moved to St. Louis.

A deal was signed last fall by city leaders with entertainment and sports events company AEG that intended to redevelop the Los Angeles Convention Center to include additional exhibition space. The agreement includes using a football stadium project at the site as leverage for bringing in financing for the improvements to the convention center.

The transition of the city’s mayor also shifted the city’s attitude toward bringing in an NFL team. New mayor Eric Garcetti has said that, while he would welcome a team, it was not his top priority.


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/24/2013 8:44:17 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

California may lose the teams that are still there due to the tax differential. Notice it is the government that is begging. Owners don’t seem to be lining up.


2 posted on 09/24/2013 8:55:17 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

LA is bankrupt. The State is bankrupt. So you float $2B in bonds to pay for it. With whose credit?


3 posted on 09/24/2013 9:03:30 PM PDT by Kozy (Calling Al Gore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Councilman Tom LaBonge, the author of the resolution, said it “puzzles me why, out of 32 teams, one doesn’t want to come here to sunny Southern California.”

Um, maybe because NFL owners are too smart to want to go bankrupt just so "sunny Southern California" can have a team or two?

4 posted on 09/24/2013 9:16:20 PM PDT by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

“Councilman Tom LaBonge, the author of the resolution, said it “puzzles me why, out of 32 teams, one doesn’t want to come here to sunny Southern California.”

Probably because you once had two teams and no one supported them. The Rams went to St Louis because fan support sucked, the Raiders went back to Oakland for the same reason. LA had their shot, the blew it. The NFL needs to move on. LA is a college football and NBA town.


5 posted on 09/24/2013 9:35:10 PM PDT by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Lived in SoCal. LA is too stupid to deserve a team. Each time the NFL starts making plans they pull the “...and we’ll put them in the Collosium” caveat. No team will ever, ever, ever agree to play in the hole even with renovations. It is gang territory. It is scummy.


6 posted on 09/24/2013 9:35:19 PM PDT by Dragonspirit (Always remember President Token won only by defecting on his CFR pledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kozy

I was thinking we could get Louis B. Mayer, Bob Hope, Bing Crosby, and Don Ameche to buy majority shares in the team.


7 posted on 09/24/2013 9:36:33 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dragonspirit

Besides they already have two “football” teams, Chivas USA and the Galaxy. ;)


8 posted on 09/24/2013 9:37:14 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Do the folks in LA want a team? They seem happy without one.


9 posted on 09/24/2013 9:49:51 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
One of the most profitable things to happen to the NFL has been to not have a team in LA. That way all the other teams can say "Build us a new billion dollar stadium complex or else we move to LA." The cities then turn their taxpayers upside down and shake to get the cash to keep the team. If LA had a team, then the "threat" would be "toss in a couple million or we move to Portland, Oregon" which just isn't as threatening.

*Portland is the largest metro area other than LA which doesn't have a team in easy driving distance.

10 posted on 09/24/2013 9:52:49 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Why is our military going to be used as Al Qaeda's air force in Syria?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; a fool in paradise

Does LA know it don’t have a NFL team? They’re happy down there with the fake Beach Boys, Disneygayland and Meheekostan.


11 posted on 09/24/2013 9:56:36 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Seeing as how the bulk of those living in the LA region are now Hispanic, the level of enthusiasm for an NFL team in LA is limited to politicians.

Most of the residents are more than happy to root for Mexico’s Soccer team.


12 posted on 09/24/2013 10:18:52 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Los Angeles Renews Efforts To Get One, Possibly Two NFL Teams

"We can't support one, so let's try to get two".

I love LA as much as anyone, but it's not an NFL town - the Trojans and Bruins have their students and local alumni, but the only NFL team with any substantial history in the city - the Rams - left for Anaheim decades ago, and then left Southern California altogether.

The Raiders drew miserable crowds for most of their 15 yrs there, drew favorable reviews from gang members for their uniform colors, and went back to Oakland - if Oakland looks more attractive to an NFL franchise than your much larger city, it's probably time to acknowledge that yours is not an NFL town.


13 posted on 09/24/2013 10:39:33 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

Ha! Don Ameche? I have not heard that name in years!! I think(?) Bob Hope held a small interest in the L.A. Rams back in the day. Maybe it was another NFL team, I’m not sure. I do know that he was involved with the ownership of the Cleveland Indians MLB team for a few years. I have an old ‘Sport Magazine’, (I have a very extensive, but not a complete collection, of those mags, from it’s first issue in 1946 to about 1972, when I quit collecting. More than a few SI’s also), with Hope on the cover. Bob Hope was one heck of a great American in my opinion. The amount of time he gave entertaining our troops, home and abroad, was flat incredible!


14 posted on 09/24/2013 11:17:23 PM PDT by bobby.223 (Retired up in the snowy mountains of the American Redoubt and it's a GREAT life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bobby.223
They owned the L.A. Dons from 1946 through 1949. It was a franchise in the old "All-American Football Conference" that merged with the NFL.

When the AAFC broke up, the best players on the LA Dons went to the LA Rams. Some other teams stayed intact when they merged with the NFL, notably the San Francisco 49ers and the Cleveland Browns. The other teams folded.

15 posted on 09/24/2013 11:35:03 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
One reason the LA Raiders drew small crowds at the LA Memorial Coliseum is because the venue is absurdly large, both in the stands and on the field.

Even if you had front row tickets on the 50 yard line, you'd need binoculars. If you were up in the cheap seats, you were probably closer to your own home than you were to the game down on the field. They've since made changes to the Coliseum for USC games, but the Raiders were long gone by that time.

The Coliseum was intended for Olympic track and field events. They can close half of the stands and still seat something like 60,000 people.

16 posted on 09/24/2013 11:52:01 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson