Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: Fresh Wind

Here is a documentary film which shows how ordinary citizens got headaches, skin rashes and other negative effects from CFL lamps, and demanded answers, and got none.

Watch this and please feel free to defend your insult again proving you are indeed a shill. Defend forcing sensitive people to suffer under these horrible harmful radiation spewing crap the EPA makes us use

These awful relics of the 1940s hurt people. There is a much better way

People need not SUFFER under these hideous monsters anymore

50 posted on 10/06/2013 2:22:56 PM PDT by Truthoverpower (The guvmint you get is the guvmint you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Truthoverpower

My insult? I merely challenged you to defend one of your claims.

You refuse to do so, and continue to accuse me of being part of your conspiracy.

I already stated that I don’t support the government mandate forcing these bulbs on the public.

But, since you are convinced that I am part of that grand conspiracy, of course you don’t believe me, and will once again accuse me of being a shill.

Of course, you also won’t believe me that I did watch your video.

One thing that I would have liked to have seen in that video was that person holding their field strength meter close to a traditional tubular fluorescent bulb, or for that matter, close to a computer power supply, a computer monitor, a lamp dimmer, a flat screen TV, or a cell phone.

That would have provided a useful basis for comparison, but the producer of that video chose not to do that. Why?

I believe you would have seen similar readings from those other devices, but that would have watered down the argument being advanced in the video, so the producers opted not to go there.

Yep, there I go again, shilling for the “purveyors”.

It’s long been known (certainly since before CFLs came along) that there are people who have sensitivity to flickering light, even if the flickering is imperceptible. This affects epileptics, and people prone to migraines. That there should be problems with CFLs certainly shouldn’t come as a surprise. I do agree that warning labels are appropriate for people who have that sensitivity.

I’d like to ask that woman who claimed that horrible rash appeared after 20 minutes next to a CFL bulb what happens to her in direct sunlight? Why didn’t the producers ask her that? Didn’t fit their agenda?

Finally, if I am such a shill, why the hell aren’t they paying me to do it? I could use the money.

54 posted on 10/06/2013 3:28:10 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson