Yes. Just like this....
 |
|
THREAD humblegunner DOES NOT LIKE
Since Jan 23, 2001
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
This THREAD has been banned or suspended.
Okay
|
Posted on 10/10/2013 10:58:07 AM PDT by dvan
Wow...read this one! Then check out the suggested web sites.
Many of the emails that I have sent or forwarded that had any anti Obama in it were negated by Snopes. I thought that was odd. Check this out.
Shades of Krystalnacht
Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court's Kagan.We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes! Ya' don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya'? We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros!
Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama! In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.
I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice. Elena Kagan, who Obama appointed, and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets. So I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep, you got it; Snopes Lied! Everyone of those dockets are there.
So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:
Referencing the article about Elana Kagan and Barak Obama dockets: The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking. Thank You. I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it.
That being said, Ill bet you didn't know this.
Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly.
Chicago Politics and the beat goes on and on and on. Once again the US Senate sold us out! Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer.
It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true right to even be there.
Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?
Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!
Check out these examples:http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790..htm
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm
.
There truly is tyranny afoot
Actually this has been known for sometime. She has needed to recuse herself from several cases but has not.
” Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets.”
Actually that is NOT what Snopes said. It said the dockets existed but did not pertain to his ‘eligibility’ issue as stated in the email. One needs to research each docket to verify this.
Can the Chief Justice force her to recuse herself?
That’s correct. None of those was an eligibility case.
That I don’t know but I wouldn’t count on Roberts to be honest. Seems to me Roberts kids were threatened because they weren’t adopted from where Roberts stated they were. That was on FR awhile back.
You know of a way to delete threads on Free Republic?
Most of us have read and known about Elana Kagan defending Barack Obama for some time now.
NEVER, NEVER trust snopes as the definitive source.
http://www.wnd.com/2010/08/187797/
"Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly described a series of cases for which Elena Kagan represented the government as eligibility cases. Those cases, in fact, were a series of unrelated disputes pending before the Supreme Court and the references have been removed from this report."
Look, I get it that Obama is bad. He has passed Klintoon, LBJ and Carter as the worst President in our history. There are a host of legitimate reasons to criticize Obama.
However, one of the main weapons that the left has in its arsenal is ridicule. They have succeeded in using ridicule to help capture an entire generation of young people. Posting stuff like this only makes the job of the left easier.
Snopes is run by an extreme left-wing man/woman team that are fanatic Obama supporters and have been caught in one lie after another.
No, but Congress can. Congress can Censor and impeach federal judges. Censor is probably best option, it just means her vote doesn’t count either side.
No. None of the Justices have that kind of power over the other Justices.
The only remedy is impeachment by Congress.
Snopes is good for debunking “kidney removal in the bathtub” stories,
but nothing even remotely political.
That was tried once, and they couldn’t even remove a blatant drunkard from the bench
and wasn’t tried again since.
Now, now, don’t discourage the youngsters, with young skulls full of mush. Many of them who have not had a clue, are just now tuning in. Lets hope to bring them along in a hurry.
I’m razzing you. Old news is new news to so many. The following comes to mind, naturally.
“Those who fail to remember history are condemned to repeat it.”
%:D
Elena Kagan: The ObamaCare Recusal That Wasn't
There are many more articles about her need to and refusal to recuse herself.
bttt
If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.
*************
The question maybe should be....
Are you interested in justice or in truth?
SNOPES is not reliable.
Coffee!
(Or us that coughee?)
Tick off a Mod?
snopes is a bogus leftist site that lies. The couple that own it are communists.
Yes. Just like this....
|
|
THREAD humblegunner DOES NOT LIKE
Since Jan 23, 2001
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
This THREAD has been banned or suspended.
Okay
|
That trick NEVER works.
I guess not. The damn thread is still here.
And so are you.
(sarc tag or no sarc tag. Can’t decide...)
So what is the registered political affiliation of this man and woman?
And if you find an answer to my prior question, please post a link to the site........thanks
Then maybe you can search it out for us and post a link to the discussion.
According to who? And does that "who" profess to have more reliable information?
So now they're communists? Care to cite YOUR sources?
What? We can afford to pay the Supreme Court?
Snopes.com changes hospital of Obama's birth 90 minutes after WND.COM article but has no..evidence
Then maybe you can search it out for us and post a link to the discussion.
I've already done some of YOUR research. You want to challenge someone, YOU research it.
:-)
"Old news is new news to so many."
How true that is.
If you think that you have proof otherwise, post it.
The lamestream media (both of the dinosaur breed and the new media) are run by evil leftists. Their currently is falsehood and they use those lies to push an anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-gun homosexual agenda.
A lot of the net is controlled by the left. FR is a bastion and we're lucky that we have our own servers.
Actually this has been known for sometime. She has needed to recuse herself from several cases but has not.
Correct, especially 0bamacare. Roberts should have made a comment regarding recusal, but no...Roberts, hmmm, (being civil...),I won't go into his so called "opinion," or him possibly being compromised [how did Nazi Pelosi know before hand?).
5.56mm
Has anyone asked snopes if snope is reliable, snoping snopes, and is there any way anyone with that much power would be able to be objective?
Well a little blackmail always works.
Hey BowWow, who is the REAL liar here? I never made any such accusation, all I did was ask for sources to all the accusations made against SNOPES.......
So why is that a problem for you?
Well what have we here? A Trew Blewer? Hm?
That it is but I am somewhat worried (hopefully I'm wrong) about the web server engine that underlies Free Republic. It's called NGINX and is a Russian-based software project. Here's their logo, complete the red star and other symbols of the Cold War and the Soviet era:
I realize that Russia is now better than it was a few ago with Putin standing up against the sodomites but I still have a measure of distrust for that country. I've pinged some of the tech experts here, as well as Jim, to possibly allay my fears of a backdoor planted by the Russians in NGINX. They used to use Apache for web services which is based in Maryland. The change was made a few months back IIRC.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1456856/posts?
From the Drudge article posted, I don't see any threat at all.....political BS, sure, but no threat.
It is a little frustrating, though. David may be a registered independent, and Barbara may be a Canadian citizen who can't register with any party but that doesn't mean that they don't have biases. Biases that come out not so much in the things they fight for, but in what they take for granted and what they dismiss as not worth discussing.
FactCheck.org's vouching for Snopes isn't very convincing, as the two groups probably share most of the same assumptions and prejudices (I don't see that Soros funds FactCheck.org, either. They have enough foundation money. Soros did fund the shortlived factcheck.com, though).
Defending Snopes are we?
Yes, leftists follow the communist line.
Snopes are worshippers of Obama.
They are leftists.
That has been discussed at length here on FR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.