To: fishtank
Calling a class of DNA "junk DNA" simply because, in your arrogance, you believe that if you don't know what it does, it must do nothing, is the same kind of "scientific" mentality that says AGW/Climate change is a fact because there is an alleged "consensus" among government-funded "scientists."
2 posted on
10/15/2013 10:58:44 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Calling a class of DNA "junk DNA" simply because, in your arrogance, you believe that if you don't know what it does, it must do nothing, is the same kind of "scientific" mentality that says AGW/Climate change is a fact because there is an alleged "consensus" among government-funded "scientists."
Bears repeating with emphasis.
4 posted on
10/15/2013 11:04:08 AM PDT by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Calling a class of DNA "junk DNA" simply because, in your arrogance, you believe that if you don't know what it does, it must do nothing,...Oh... you mean like Democrats?
5 posted on
10/15/2013 11:16:19 AM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(The monsters are due on Maple Street)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
appendix was called “junk” by doctors and science. now we know its a resovoir of gut bacteria in case the intestines need replenishing.
coccyx too. try removing it and see what “junk” it is.
such is the nature of natural man.
7 posted on
10/15/2013 11:47:15 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson