Skip to comments.John Kerry doubts John F. Kennedy assassin Lee Harvey Oswald worked alone
Posted on 11/09/2013 1:21:20 PM PST by Sub-DriverEdited on 11/09/2013 2:33:07 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
JOHN Kerry has added credibility to a conspiracy theory that John F. Kennedy's assassin may not have worked alone.
The US Secretary of State has become one of the highest-ranking politicians to publicly doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone conspirator in Kennedy's murder, admitting to a journalist that he was suspicious of the government’s official finding.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...
Oswald was a double agent. He was acting on behalf of the US government. He spent time in Russia and Cuba because that was his assignment. And his next assignment was ...
John Fn Kerry is a Liar, Fraud & Traitor.
And a total useful idiot. But a very ineffective one.
Kerry has long experience planning political assassinations. He should know.
John Kerry is as smart as an eggplant now. He was even stupider in the sixties, so I really don’t care what is dumbass opinions are or were about anything ever.
I hate Kerry....for just about anything you can name.
but LBJ had Kennedy offed.
I’ve had meatloaf with more intelligence than Kerry. But I’ve always believed it wasn’t Oswald acting alone.
A lot of people think that but Jean sKerry thinks it was Jenjiss Con.
Nail. On. The. Head.
If Kerry thinks Oswald didn’t act alone, horseface should name names...or STFU...
I used to question the “acted alone” theory. But now that this dunce openly questions it, I am convinced...Oswald acted alone.
“horseface should name names...or STFU...”
LBJ done it and he was a Democrat! Kerry will STFU!
The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ [Hardcover]
Roger Stone (Author), Mike Colapietro (Contributor)
This kind of makes sense being it took place in Dallas and Johnson was a real crook
No, he didn’t.
LBJ operative malcom Wallace whose prints were on the boxes used as a rifle rest killed jfk for Johnson. He also took care of other inconvenient people for LBJ
I’m inclined to believe that one lone lefty nutcase loser of no use even to the Soviets took three not too difficult shots & assassinated a President. When captured, he had a smirk that “looked like the cat that swallowed the canary” according to one Dallas cop. He knew his place in history was already assured.
But when Oswald himself was killed, it was a green light for all the conspiracies from then to now to hatch out.
Anyway, whenever Jean F’in Kerry opens his wealthy aristocrat yap, it reminds me that I’ve seen smarter heads on LETTUCE!!!
Where did you cook that one up?
I'd LOVE to see you attempt the same 3 "easy" shots, without the pressure of a live and moving target.
These two conspiracy theorists die in a car crash. When they get to heaven the first one says, “God, who killed JFK?”
God says, “Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK.”
The second one says, “Oh, WOW! This is WAY bigger than we though!”
But, but John is a war hero.......not
He couldn't hit a stationary target from 100 feet in April... but by November, he could hit 2 of 3, at a moving target, at more than double the distance. Mm hmm.
A slow target moving directly away, no windage shift necessary. Not my opinion but computer reconstructions & marksmen aiming & firing the same Carcano rifle seem to bear this out.
“Sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar.”
So, Lurch, does 0bama work alone on killing international cooperation between the US and all else?
Google Malcolm (Mac) Wallace. Do your own research. Bobby Kennedy, during a cabinet meeting, accused LBJ of killing JFK . Google that too.
I’ve stood in the book depository building right about where Oswald was; his actual window is blocked off but one can within 3-4 feet of it. On the roadway in Dealy Plaza there is a “X” painted to indicate where Kennedy was first hit. I could make one or two of those shots. A Marine trained rifleman could make all three. Whether he did or not is unknown but the difficulty of that shot has been over played
Kerry was 20 when Kennedy was shot, Oswald was 24.
Maybe they worked as a team, and Kerry was the second shooter.
“John Kerry doubts John F. Kennedy assassin Lee Harvey Oswald worked alone”
Well, THAT tears it, Oswald worked stone alone.
I never thought he acted alone.
This article just lost credibility.
Interesting and well presented theory that Secret Service Agent George Hickey accidentally fired the fatal shot:
Absolutely! LBJ was behind it!
I used to be big JFK conspiracy buff. Now i believe it was LHO alone. I think the evidence and Occam's razor points to Oswald.
John Kerry helped the Communist enemy defeat the South Vietnamese.
He has no credibility.
“What difference does it make?”
Yes he did! I am willing to bet that JFK was not the only person that LBJ rubbed out.
Malcolm Wallace. Interesting story.
LBJ. The original Arkancide
“Ive had meatloaf with more intelligence than Kerry.” LOL. Jane Kerry just gave 75 million to the Palestinians, yea he’s got some credibility. /s
I saw Oswald’s DD-214 and he had the same mos I had: Avionics technician (communications, navigation, identifications). He worked on F-86’s if I remember. Squadron-wise thats near the top IQ wise for an enlisted man. I always thought he was CIA, that probably means more than one. As far as shooting goes, I saw a guy on film with a bolt action rifle kill a charging lion with three shots and the lion couldn’t have been much more than 50 yards away.
I already knew John Kerry was an idiot.
No it doesn't, because no matter what you think of LBJ, it's a fact that Oswald shot Kennedy. There is no link between LBJ and Oswald.
It's absurd nonsense that was utterly debunked long ago. It's just the irresponsible sensationalism of the media that causes this to be brought back up again.
Wallace's prints were not on the boxes. That was a false claim.
Walker got extremely lucky. He moved just as the shot was fired. The trajectory showed that had he not he would have been killed. It was a good shot.
With grace and aplomb!
“It’s absurd nonsense that was utterly debunked long ago. It’s just the irresponsible sensationalism of the media that causes this to be brought back up again. “
A bald, unsubstantiated statement against a well present theory. I think your statement is the irresponsible one.