Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beastie Boys, 'Girls' Viral Video in Copyright Infringement Fight
Hollywood Reporter ^ | 11-22-2013

Posted on 11/25/2013 6:22:26 AM PST by ToxicMich

This week, a toy company called Goldieblox ignited a chatterstorm with a video of three girls playing with a Rube Goldberg-type contraption and singing alternative lyrics to the Beastie Boys song "Girls." Since the video went up on Monday, it has been viewed more than seven million times and fueled discussion about how to get young girls interested in pursuing scientific careers.

(Excerpt) Read more at hollywoodreporter.com ...


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Business/Economy; Music/Entertainment; Society
KEYWORDS:
The lawyer you suggested that this lawsuit was a good idea should be fired immediately... This is going to backfire big time for the Beastie Boys
1 posted on 11/25/2013 6:22:26 AM PST by ToxicMich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich

The video is pretty lame. I wouldn’t be surprised if they paid Beastie Boys to sue in order to get some publicity.

As to their product - creating toys to get girls interested in science? Where is the business plan? Who funded such a concept? This has to be funded by the government, because investment banker would ever put his or his clients money into such a venture, hoping to turn a profit.


2 posted on 11/25/2013 6:29:24 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich
Not so fast, champ . . . this one can go either way. If Goldieblox wasn't trying to sell product, the issue would be clearer.
3 posted on 11/25/2013 6:30:41 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich

I was recently in a Jr High...and the thing that I notice over and over was how immature the boys were...long hair in the face - clueless about social politeness - and basic hygiene....where on the other hand, the same age girls took their studies seriously, were actual able to carry on a conversation, used manners, waited until the other person stop talking before responding, and more or less took pride in self-appearance...and I thought, WOW - here are the leaders of society at the early stages of what they are doing to build successful social skills to compete in the real world - while totally UN-phased - the boys poked each other with pencils - goofed off while playing video games that my kindergartener plays....

But that’s society - ever changing and no one expects any different...


4 posted on 11/25/2013 6:31:09 AM PST by BCW (Salva reipublicae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCW

When I was in junior high (mid-80’s, Massachusetts), I recall the girls paying attention in class while us boys had other priorities.

As I recall, the big thing of the day was perfecting the art of “rednecking”; wetting two fingers and slapping the unaware kid on the back of the neck. The redder the welt the better, hence the name.

Sounds like very little has changed, except the hair length. Short hair made for excellent neck targeting.


5 posted on 11/25/2013 6:38:48 AM PST by mquinn (Obama's supporters: a deliberate drowning of consciousness by means of rhythmic noise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BCW

Girls have always matured faster than boys. Boys don’t start to get their act together until their hormones kick in and they get interest in girls, and then realize they need to impress them somehow.


6 posted on 11/25/2013 6:45:42 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Sorry bud, but your post doesn’t make any sense. Why is it lame and why can’t it turn a profit?


7 posted on 11/25/2013 6:46:41 AM PST by ToxicMich ((If you are reading this, you are wasting your time. There is nothing here...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

“Two at a time I want....GIRLS!”

How could they miss quoting those classic lyrics?


8 posted on 11/25/2013 6:48:35 AM PST by Rodney Dangerfield (Q: How do you brainwash a liberal? A: Give them an enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich
The lawyer you suggested that this lawsuit was a good idea should be fired immediately

I disagree. Based on what I'm reading I don't see why somebody can simply take their hard work and creativity, change a few words, and sell a product using it. Why copyright at all if not to prevent this?

Isn't this basically what happened to Vanilla Ice when he ripped off the riff from "Under Pressure"?

This is going to backfire big time for the Beastie Boys

I doubt it. I don't think they're really big enough any more for this to affect them one way or the other from a PR standpoint.

If I remember correctly, early in their careers, the group got royally ripped off on their original contract. From what I read, they ended up with virtually nothing to show for any of their work through "Licensed to Ill". With a history of being contractually screwed over, I don't blame them for getting po'd when somebody goes out and rips off their work.
9 posted on 11/25/2013 7:01:20 AM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich

As if I am going to give up listening to the Beastie Boys because of a lawsuit like this! They should be suing for such a lame use of their song - and if producers of these toys want to portray girls that want to be treated like they have a brain - they shouldn’t dress up the girls in the ad in little frilly outfits and make everything pink. How stupid.


10 posted on 11/25/2013 7:23:01 AM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCW
"...waited until the other person stop talking before responding..."

I know a great many adults who don't know how to do that.

11 posted on 11/25/2013 7:27:17 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts ("It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

my four year old shrieked with delight while watching it and made me play it fvie times for her. so i guess your guys votes cancel each other out:)


12 posted on 11/25/2013 7:27:25 AM PST by Shamrock498
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cathy

this is the commercial i saw. they ridicule the “pink frilly” culture you speak of. the girls are dressed normal. did you see something different or was it a different video?....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFpe3Up9T_g


13 posted on 11/25/2013 7:37:59 AM PST by Shamrock498
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Shamrock498; Revolting cat!
If it's a viral video on youtube causing outrage, Obama and the Hillary will put a stop to this at once. People could get killed!


14 posted on 11/25/2013 7:53:48 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Shamrock498

I didn’t say they were wearing “pink Frilly” but “frilly” - look at the frilly skirts 2/3 of the little girls are wearing at the end. I actually don’t know too many little girls that wear frilly skirts in elementary, maybe we are just lucky.

I think the commercial is a big fail.


15 posted on 11/25/2013 7:57:49 AM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich

OK that was stupid !


16 posted on 11/25/2013 7:58:56 AM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (I'm not afraid to say what i mean nor should you be afraid of what you know to be true !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathy

sorry i added “pink” to your descricption. thats how little girls dress where i live so it didnt strike me as odd. my four year old is hard to get out of the house if she doesnt have some kind of skirt/tutu on so it looks natural to me:) no problem.

my daughter loved it and im excited that shes interested in something other than tinkerbell and disney princesses for a change. take care


17 posted on 11/25/2013 8:18:45 AM PST by Shamrock498
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Cripes. Read the article, people.

On Monday, the band released a letter saying while it was “impressed by the creativity and the message” of the Goldieblox video, “make no mistake, your video is an advertisement that is designed to sell a product, and long ago, we made a conscious decision not to permit our music and/or name to be used in product ads... When we tried to simply ask how and why our song ‘Girls’ had been used in your ad without our permission, YOU sued US."

18 posted on 11/25/2013 8:24:29 AM PST by APFel (Regnum Nostrum Crescit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich

The “lawsuit” was actually filed by the toy company, AGAINST the Beastie Boys. The Beastie Boys were not suing. They had sent a letter asking for an explanation as to why the company had taken their intellectual property, that the toy company responded by suing the Beastie Boys for the right to use their work without compensation to help them sell toys.


19 posted on 11/25/2013 9:36:09 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

So they used the Beastie Boys song “Girls” or a remake of it and they are suing the BB’s?

WTF? You can sue anyone for anything these days.

Not a big fan of the BB’s politics (They hated Giuliani when he was elected Mayor of NYC) but I liked some of their earlier stuff.

“Paul’s Boutique” didn’t sell well, but that record was unique and ahead of its time IMO

Their obscure pop-culture references and how they would work them into their songs were genius.

Example: “There’s more to me than you’ll ever know/And I got more hits than Sadaharu Oh”

How many people would get that reference?

Sadaharu Oh was a Japanese baseball player and a prolific hitter. He finished his career with nearly 900 Home Runs, although the playing fields in Japanese ball parks were much smaller than in the US, so hitting HR’s there was a lot easier than hitting them in MLB parks, although the newer parks have dimensions closer to those of MLB parks nowadays.

Many American ballplayers have easily come close to breaking Oh’s single-season HR record in Japan, but opposing teams will intentionally walk the American batter every time if he is close to the record so Oh’s single-season record is not broken by a foreigner.

Sorry, going a bit OT here...

Back in the 1980’s, rappers would often “sample” other artists’ work all the time without any compensation until the law was changed, but this new song is a complete rip-off of the original “Girls” song.

I hope the two remaining members of the BB’s counter-sue and win.

Had they asked permission, I’m sure “Mike D” (Michael Diamond) and “King Ad-Rock” (Adam Horowitz) would have given them permission to use the song without any demand for compensation.

Time flies. The two surviving members must be in their 50’s by now.

The 3rd member died several years ago of cancer. Adam “MCA” Yauch?


20 posted on 11/25/2013 11:38:44 AM PST by Rodney Dangerfield (Q: How do you brainwash a liberal? A: Give them an enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson