Posted on 12/06/2013 3:31:21 PM PST by BenLurkin
When I go to the movies, I want to be caught up in a story. High Frame Rate makes me caught up in a set, in makeup, in feeling like I'm pushed around in a wheelbarrow through something fake. It feels like looking at a full-motion diorama.
I haven’t seen the second one yet, but the first was mostly a snoozer. He should probably have cut this down to two films, max. Not everything has to be a trilogy, it’s getting ridiculous.
I just couldn’t get past what a bad movie the first one was.
I can’t take three movies for one book.
The Hobbit is not a long book. There is no reason in the world why a movie picture adaptation should exceed 120 minutes. Total.
If they took out all the walking it would only be 30 minutes long.
What? BenLurkin because you’re afraid that people will find out how terrible your taste in movies is? Just saying.
I liked it quite a bit.
I disagree. While Peter Jackson should have included only relevant background material in the Hobbit, it should be as long as it needs to be.
In the Hobbit’s case, three movies might have been too much, but it certainly would have needed two movies to tell the whole story.
You can call me Ben, Newbie.
I haven’t seen the first one. If it’s that bad, then maybe Jackson should’ve done a “scouring of the Shire” in its place.
I did see the first installment of “The Hobbit”. I enjoyed it; found the storytelling, acting, cinematography engaging throughout.
IMO, if someone found it boring, the problem is elsewhere than the film itself ...
Some of us like to wallow in our fantasy. TLOTR brushed over too many potential stories for me. Eight long movies for Harry Potter seemed rushed to me. ;-)
I loathed the farce of the dwarves running around in the goblin cave.
I loved LOTR Trilogy but was very disappointed there was no scouring. Nearly my favorite part of the books.
There are some great bits in the first one - some bits did seem superfluous like the mountain battle or whatever it was called and it pretty well jumped the with shark with some of the action stuff in the Goblin Kings cave. It is not LOTR and does not try to be - it is far more lighthearted. The Desolation of Smaulg doesn’t come out here until the day after Christmas - looking forward to it!
It has it’s moments, it’s just bloated, like they stretched it out to fill up a trilogy. The last hour is worth waiting for though, if you can make it.
How ironic. Somebody complaining about trilogies when it comes to works of Tolkien.
“The Desolation of Smaug”
What is a Smaug?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.