Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug - review
theguardian.com ^ | Friday 6 December 2013 22.17 GMT | Peter Bradshaw

Posted on 12/06/2013 3:31:21 PM PST by BenLurkin

eter Jackson has picked up the pace. He began his Hobbit trilogy at an amiable, meanderingly wayward canter, and tried the patience of believers and non-believers alike with that initial supper scene, almost an epic in itself. But this second episode commences with a narrative whipcrack – a quick flashback to Gandalf and Thorin tensely discussing their great plan in the snug bar of the Prancing Pony – and then we're off, at a tremendous gallop.

The Desolation of Smaug is a cheerfully entertaining and exhilarating adventure tale, a supercharged Saturday morning picture: it's mysterious and strange and yet Jackson also effortlessly conjures up that genial quality that distinguishes The Hobbit from the more solemn Rings stories. The absurdity is winning: you're laughing with, not laughing at. For me, it never sagged once in its mighty two hour 40 minutes running time and the high-frame-rate projection for this film somehow looks richer and denser than it did the last time around. Maybe I'm just getting used to it. Jackson has shown that he is an expert in big-league popular movie-making to rival Lucas and Spielberg. His Smaug, with its fight scenes, chase spectaculars, creepy creatures and secret stone doors opening with a grinding noise, is something to set alongside the Indiana Jones films.

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies; The Hobbit Hole
KEYWORDS: desolationofsmog; movies; smaug; thehobbit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Yossarian
I tried "high frame rate" the last time around, and I feel it very much detracted from the movie going experience.

I agree. It didn't look smoother, it looked sped-up. Very distracting.

41 posted on 12/06/2013 6:42:39 PM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: melsec
I'll have to post the picture.

Pizza buffet for 7 $50.00.
7 matinee movie tickets $60.00.

The memmories?

Worth more than all of Earth's riches!

42 posted on 12/06/2013 6:47:13 PM PST by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: melsec

“Bilbo Baggins and the Temple of Doom” just didn’t cut it for me.


43 posted on 12/06/2013 6:55:35 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Liberals are like locusts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The Hobbit is not a long book. There is no reason in the world why a movie picture adaptation should exceed 120 minutes. Total.

There is an excellent reason to make The Hobbit into three movies: it allows those of us who love Middle Earth to spend as much time there as possible. I'm just unhappy that when the entire cycle is finished, we will have in total less than 18 hours in those magnificent realms.

44 posted on 12/06/2013 7:06:44 PM PST by ottbmare (the OTTB mare, now a proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

A Smaug is a disgusting, stinking, vile beast from Kenya which infests white houses.


45 posted on 12/06/2013 8:05:36 PM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Thats funny lol :)


46 posted on 12/06/2013 8:26:49 PM PST by melsec (Once a Jolly Swagman camped by a Billabong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Amen!


47 posted on 12/06/2013 8:27:15 PM PST by melsec (Once a Jolly Swagman camped by a Billabong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
So what's next - Peter Jackson's The Silmarillion?
48 posted on 12/07/2013 2:43:50 AM PST by FroggyTheGremlim ("It is not the color of his skin, ... it is the blackness that fills his soul")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The Hobbit is not a long book. There is no reason in the world why a movie picture adaptation should exceed 120 minutes. Total.

C'mon - the theaters need longer movies to sell ore of the "economy-sized" popcorn. Besides, people want to get more for their money even if more means less.

On the flip side, movies can be like shopping - I like to do a fast in-and-out foray...

49 posted on 12/07/2013 3:07:23 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

bump!


50 posted on 12/07/2013 6:51:16 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson