Posted on 12/25/2013 8:30:09 AM PST by Libloather
President Obama's personal data is "not in particular government data bases" so his identity cannot be verified. And this according to White House sources. Huh? What kind of data? And what kind of president cannot have his identity verified. And this little disclosure comes just as Americans are turning off the news to an extent that makes the classic "Friday afternoon data dump" look like publicity-seeking.
**SNIP**
Here are some simple questions:
Does Obama file his tax returns by way of sending staff to a DC IRS building?
If not, why not?
Doesn't the integrity of Obama's tax returns relate to security risks?
Or, is Obama's information in IRS databases and not other federal agency databases accessed by HHS?
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
” The crew inhabiting the White House are simply so stupid it’s hard to keep up “
The crew in the WhiteHut are moo-slimes - so you know how that works ~
AND has a green bologna sandwich waiting for him too. :)
Hopefully, someone explained misprison of Treason to the Judge
I think you are right. Whitewater was a setup where everyone jumped on the prosecutor. Became an issue about blo jobs in the Oval Office. At least it cemented his legacy-lol.
Was this ever done with any previous President?
What you are saying is that we are no longer a nation of laws, but of men.
Good question. I suppose that after a certain point the Secret Service has to protect the private information of a president, but I distinctly remember in the Clinton terms a full disclosure of his tax returns. President Obama is clearly 'the man who never was'. We know literally nothing about him at all. He is the figment of somebody's imagination. We just don't know whose.
So what. We live in a banana republic.
Each state has its own certification requirements to get on the ballot. For example, in Arizona Obama himself had to sign a form endorsed by a Notary that he was a natural born citizen of the United States.
http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/11107727
And in 2012, before clearing him for the ballot the Arizona Secretary of State required a Letter of Verification from the state of Hawaii attesting to Obama’s birth certificate.
http://www.azcentral.com/12news/Obama-Verification.pdf
The Secretary of State in Kansas required a Hawaii Letter of Verification as
well:
http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/106576604
No he didn’t. The judge said that Orly Taitz could amend her complaint if she had any new information.
Here’s what the judge said in his order:
Judge Hollander writes:
“Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint was filed before the SSA responded to her FOIA request, and has been rendered moot by the SSA’s response to her FOIA request. If plaintiff takes issue with the adequacy of the SSA’s response, she must amend her complaint to add allegations that the SSA’s response was deficient.
Accordingly, I will dismiss plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, without prejudice, and with leave to amend within 21 days of the docketing of the accompanying Order, so that plaintiff may properly allege the claims she raised in her Opposition. I will also deny plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF 9), without prejudice.”
When will this foreign invasion end? The job market is ruined, the dollar is worthless, gas and groceries are crazy expensive yet we still have to suffer under the bootleg of this foreign gauletier. Cannot a citizen make a citizen’s arrest on this chump? How come the freakin Egyptians get it and we don’t? I am very proud for the Egyptian people and very disappointed to be an American.
But now a judge is demanding the federal government respond to the fraud. Judge Hollander has subpoenaed all documents from the Social Security Administration that relate to Bounel’s, or Obama’s, Social Security number. If the federal government refuses to turn over the “missing documents,” individual employees will be held responsible.
Got it!
:-)
Judge Hollander has not issued any subpoenas for SSA records in this case. What she did was give the plaintiff 21 days to amend her complaint one more time, period.
Dr. Taitz must convince the judge that the Social Security Administration’s search for records of a Harrison J. Bounel was inadequate. The SSA says that it has no such records.
From the Defendant’s response in Colvin v. Taitz:
“The Social Security Administration does not possess records in the name of Harrison J. Bounel based on the information provided by the Plaintiff.”
The SSA issued the exact same response when a George W. Bush appointed administrator (Michael Astrue) headed up the Social Security Administration in Taitz v. Astrue. Now there is an Obama appointed Administrator, Carolyn Colvin.
That’s not what the article said.I copied a direct quote from the article so you’re saying you know more about the case than the author and Orly I take it.Typical guess work on these threads lately.
*sigh*
Oh well. Thanks for your summary. I had heard about him not using the Obamacare website, and thought this was a little fleshing out of it.
We’re boxing with shadows.
[Somebody turn on the Light already!!!]
“Deem as passed”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.