Skip to comments.Don’t make your kids kiss granny: Outcry as sex education chiefs say a high-five or wave…
Posted on 01/08/2014 2:16:11 AM PST by Olog-hai
Getting a reluctant child to give an elderly relative a kiss often requires some gentle persuasion.
But parents who force their sons and daughters to give granny a peck on the cheek may be doing them harm, it was claimed yesterday.
For instead of helping a child learn about showing affection, it may blur the boundaries of what is acceptable when it comes to physical contact, according to Lucy Emmerson, coordinator of the Sex Education Forum.
She even claims that encouraging a youngster to blow a kiss, high-five or wave to a relative instead will help them avoid future sexual exploitation. Children need to learn from the start about the importance of consent and that their bodies are their own, she says.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
More abolition of the family. Since when is kissing your grandmother sexual exploitation and sex ed per se in schools not?
Dont make your kids kiss granny: Outcry as sex education chiefs say a high-five or wave protects children from abuse
A peck on grandma's cheek leads to future sexual exploitation?!!! really? I don't see the connection.
Because grandma wants a kiss from a grand child, she'll later exploit the child? Hmmm. Only lesbians can come up with this.
What nonsense. Society really is taking leave of its senses here in the 21st century.
I thought “blurring the boundaries” was the goal of these groups? Like showing 6 yr olds that sodomy is natural love and showing 11 yr olds how to put condoms on bananas and making abortion pills open to access to 13 yr olds?
maybe when Mommy 1 or 2 tries to force a child to take naked baths together, that is blurring the lines?
apparently not, since judges have ordered parental custody awarded to partners who did that.
But it is OK to give them a condom in kindergarten and show them how to put it on.
Do they teach anything else in schools besides “how to” sex topics?
I don’t recall when math, history, geography or reading was discussed. Do they still teach that?
Scary thought is that a generation of Flukes is being reared.
Lucy Emmerson, Coordinator of the Sex Education Forum said:
“Including puberty in Year 5 means that children have a better chance of learning about changes to their bodies before they experience them: this is a real step forward. We are also really pleased that the new National Curriculum documents explain that ‘sex andrelationshipeducation’ is a requirement for all state secondary schools. The addition of relationships is crucial, as it indicates a widening of the subject beyond biological matters to cover other important issues such as consent, appropriate behaviour and dealing with emotions.”
Keep her on the other side of the pond....and take Piers with you!
Kissing granny - bad
Rump Rangering - good
I foresee the little smiling baby with all the lipstick marks showing up soon. I love that pic.
More socialist horse manure.
You are right, the left is completely confused about sex, as about most things. Liberalism truly is a mental disorder!
That being said I did know, as a child, one old lady who was just right out of a cartoon. She’d mush you and squish you and kiss you; you’d be half dead by the time she got through with you.
LOL, but she loved you, that came across loud and clear.
I think (and I was really young and only met this gal a few times) she was the Italian born mother of my godmother. She was very large too.
Did I survive? Yes. Did this confuse me about sexual boundaries or personal space? No.
These people should really all go work in soup kitchens. There are people who could use their energy and desire to “help”.
SARAH (HARRIS) You ignorant slut.
Now THAT’s pornography!
Is that ‘year 5’ of school (fifth grade) or ‘year 5’ of the kid’s life? I’d hope it’s the former but can’t be certain.
**The new introduction for sex education is starting from age 5 years old, this include showing them pictures as explicit as rated adults only.**
And when Gramma ain't happy, there ain't NOBODY happy.
I'll go out on a limb and guess that "Lucy Emmerson" is of that persuasion. OR, she doesn't have kids. Or both.
It’s not kissing your grandmother, it’s forcing them to kiss gran if they don’t want to
I completely agree with this
Don’t force any kid to kiss anyone they don’t want to kiss
I don’t see it as “sexual exploitation”, but such rejection as a strong biological imperative against incest.
Children inherently do not want even pseudo-sexual contact with their family, because the outcomes of actual sexual contact over generations are self-destructive.
In those peoples who do not have such biological prerogatives truly awful things result. This impulse has been overridden in some Islamic cultures especially, and it gets really ugly.
“But it’s just a kiss!”, doesn’t work as an argument, because it crosses the line of affectionate intimacy, as least as far as biology is concerned.
The context they’re using is way out of whack.
“Year 5” in this context normally means fifth grade, not age 5...
But schools who order girls to ask other girls to kiss them is probably fine
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.