Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don’t make your kids kiss granny: Outcry as sex education chiefs say a high-five or wave…
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | 02:14 EST, 8 January 2014 | Sarah Harris

Posted on 01/08/2014 2:16:11 AM PST by Olog-hai

Getting a reluctant child to give an elderly relative a kiss often requires some gentle persuasion.

But parents who force their sons and daughters to give granny a peck on the cheek may be doing them harm, it was claimed yesterday.

For instead of helping a child learn about showing affection, it may blur the boundaries of what is acceptable when it comes to physical contact, according to Lucy Emmerson, coordinator of the Sex Education Forum.

She even claims that encouraging a youngster to blow a kiss, high-five or wave to a relative instead will help them avoid future sexual exploitation. Children need to learn from the start about the importance of consent and that “their bodies are their own”, she says. …

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: academicbias; antibreeder; comeforyourchildren; cultureofcorruption; culturewar; naughtyteacherslist; nuclearfamily; platoniclove; sexeducation; sexpositiveagenda; sexualizingchildren
Original Daily Mail title:
Don’t make your kids kiss granny: Outcry as sex education chiefs say a high-five or wave protects children from abuse
More abolition of the family. Since when is kissing your grandmother “sexual exploitation” and sex ed per se in schools not?
1 posted on 01/08/2014 2:16:11 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
"Children need to learn from the start about the importance of consent and that “their bodies are their own”, she says."

A peck on grandma's cheek leads to future sexual exploitation?!!! really? I don't see the connection.

Because grandma wants a kiss from a grand child, she'll later exploit the child? Hmmm. Only lesbians can come up with this.

2 posted on 01/08/2014 2:38:13 AM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

What nonsense. Society really is taking leave of its senses here in the 21st century.


3 posted on 01/08/2014 2:44:17 AM PST by DemforBush (Ice cream, Mandrake? Children's ice cream?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I thought “blurring the boundaries” was the goal of these groups? Like showing 6 yr olds that sodomy is natural love and showing 11 yr olds how to put condoms on bananas and making abortion pills open to access to 13 yr olds?


4 posted on 01/08/2014 2:57:14 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Rain_Drop

maybe when Mommy 1 or 2 tries to force a child to take naked baths together, that is blurring the lines?

apparently not, since judges have ordered parental custody awarded to partners who did that.


5 posted on 01/08/2014 2:59:08 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

But it is OK to give them a condom in kindergarten and show them how to put it on.


6 posted on 01/08/2014 3:05:59 AM PST by ImNotLying (The Right To Bear Arms: Making good people helpless won't make bad people harmless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Do they teach anything else in schools besides “how to” sex topics?
I don’t recall when math, history, geography or reading was discussed. Do they still teach that?
Scary thought is that a generation of Flukes is being reared.


7 posted on 01/08/2014 3:17:12 AM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Lucy Emmerson, Coordinator of the Sex Education Forum said:
“Including puberty in Year 5 means that children have a better chance of learning about changes to their bodies before they experience them: this is a real step forward. We are also really pleased that the new National Curriculum documents explain that ‘sex andrelationshipeducation’ is a requirement for all state secondary schools. The addition of relationships is crucial, as it indicates a widening of the subject beyond biological matters to cover other important issues such as consent, appropriate behaviour and dealing with emotions.”


5 y/olds learning about puberty. Good call Lucy.


8 posted on 01/08/2014 3:22:50 AM PST by Daffynition (It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Rain_Drop

Keep her on the other side of the pond....and take Piers with you!

9 posted on 01/08/2014 3:24:43 AM PST by Daffynition (It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Kissing granny - bad
Rump Rangering - good


10 posted on 01/08/2014 3:39:47 AM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

I foresee the little smiling baby with all the lipstick marks showing up soon. I love that pic.


11 posted on 01/08/2014 3:45:14 AM PST by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

More socialist horse manure.


12 posted on 01/08/2014 3:48:08 AM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dusty Road
Haven't got that particular image in my repertoire...this'll hafta do.


13 posted on 01/08/2014 4:04:37 AM PST by Daffynition (It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

You are right, the left is completely confused about sex, as about most things. Liberalism truly is a mental disorder!

That being said I did know, as a child, one old lady who was just right out of a cartoon. She’d mush you and squish you and kiss you; you’d be half dead by the time she got through with you.

LOL, but she loved you, that came across loud and clear.

I think (and I was really young and only met this gal a few times) she was the Italian born mother of my godmother. She was very large too.

Did I survive? Yes. Did this confuse me about sexual boundaries or personal space? No.

These people should really all go work in soup kitchens. There are people who could use their energy and desire to “help”.


14 posted on 01/08/2014 4:16:49 AM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

SARAH (HARRIS) You ignorant slut.


15 posted on 01/08/2014 4:33:19 AM PST by Autonomous User (Pain Fades. Chicks Dig Scars. Glory, lasts forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Now THAT’s pornography!


16 posted on 01/08/2014 4:41:26 AM PST by Hardastarboard (The question of our age is whether a majority of Americans can and will vote us all into slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Is that ‘year 5’ of school (fifth grade) or ‘year 5’ of the kid’s life? I’d hope it’s the former but can’t be certain.


17 posted on 01/08/2014 4:57:36 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bob

**The new introduction for sex education is starting from age 5 years old, this include showing them pictures as explicit as rated adults only.**

http://www.womenconfidentials.com/2011/explicit-sex-education-images-criticised-by-christian-institute/


18 posted on 01/08/2014 5:25:34 AM PST by Daffynition (It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hattend

Bingo!


19 posted on 01/08/2014 5:26:28 AM PST by Flick Lives (Got a problem with the government? Have a complaint. Get a free IRS audit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
AAACCKKKK!!! There goes breakfast!!!
20 posted on 01/08/2014 5:55:15 AM PST by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is...sounding pretty good about now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Gramma won't like this.

And when Gramma ain't happy, there ain't NOBODY happy.

21 posted on 01/08/2014 6:06:17 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Rain_Drop
Only lesbians can come up with this.

I'll go out on a limb and guess that "Lucy Emmerson" is of that persuasion. OR, she doesn't have kids. Or both.

22 posted on 01/08/2014 6:07:17 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It’s not kissing your grandmother, it’s forcing them to kiss gran if they don’t want to

I completely agree with this

Don’t force any kid to kiss anyone they don’t want to kiss


23 posted on 01/08/2014 6:19:21 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I don’t see it as “sexual exploitation”, but such rejection as a strong biological imperative against incest.

Children inherently do not want even pseudo-sexual contact with their family, because the outcomes of actual sexual contact over generations are self-destructive.

In those peoples who do not have such biological prerogatives truly awful things result. This impulse has been overridden in some Islamic cultures especially, and it gets really ugly.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/01/world/saudi-arabia-awakes-to-the-perils-of-inbreeding.html

“But it’s just a kiss!”, doesn’t work as an argument, because it crosses the line of affectionate intimacy, as least as far as biology is concerned.


24 posted on 01/08/2014 6:20:36 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (There Is Still A Very Hot War On Terror, Just Not On The MSM. Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

The context they’re using is way out of whack.


25 posted on 01/08/2014 6:49:44 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

“Year 5” in this context normally means fifth grade, not age 5...


26 posted on 01/08/2014 7:47:39 PM PST by Fire_on_High (RIP City of Heroes and Paragon Studios, victim of the Obamaconomy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

But schools who order girls to ask other girls to kiss them is probably fine


27 posted on 01/08/2014 7:48:33 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson