Skip to comments.Top 10 Reasons Why Soccer Is Better Than Football
Posted on 01/09/2014 7:21:34 AM PST by C19fan
Soccer is, without a doubt, the world's most popular sport. Football is, without a doubt, America's most popular. Football absolutely dominates in the U.S., but once you leave North America and nobody cares about Brady vs. Manning, or Auburn vs. Alabama. Messi vs. Ronaldo? That's more like it.
The new year dawns, like always, with a zillion college bowl games and the NFL playoffs, and the over-saturation of football has us puzzled as to why its popularity so outstrips soccer's in this country. Football's flaws, some unredeemable, are there for all to see: serious injuries, drawn-out replay reviews to interpret Byzantine rulebooks, and - let's be honest - extremely creepy commercials for Old Spice. What good reason is there to choose all that mess over "The Beautiful Game"?
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearsports.com ...
10: Superior Commentary
His claim is given soccer's non-stop "action" commentators do not have the time to say anything stupid. /src on/Great commentary when one is just talking about how a pass is going from Player A to B./src off/
9: Friendlies: He claims these exhibition matches are great opportunities to watch the best clubs in the world compete against each other. What is left out is how often these clubs will not play their top players. The quality of play is often on par with NFL exhibition games.
8: Ticket Prices: He is comparing a sport with close to 40 matches a year to a sport with 12 - 16 games a season. The fact that soccer tickets are cheaper indicates the clubs need to keep prices low to attract fans.
7: The Atmosphere: He cites one German club. The average attendance for all Bundesliga is 45,000. Somtimes I watch European clubs on cable and for many matches outside the top flight clubs there are tons of empty seats.
6: More Quality Matches: He cites the fact given the different physical requirements soccer teams play more meaningful games. The problem is the European leagues are so top heavy the only meaningful games are those between those top teams.
5: Clear Champions
4: Uninterrupted Play: I don't count passing a round ball around with 99% of the time nothing gained as exciting uninterrupted play.
3: The Goals: Claims given the lack of scoring in soccer each goal is so important. Sort of contradicts point (5).
2: Player Safety
1: True International Competition. Fair enough but so what this country was founded as something different than from the rest of the world.
Who cares what the rest of the world thinks..OH WAIT LIBS DO..now this makes sense.
Hogwash! Soccer flourishes because it is inexpensive to play.
Seems like EXTREMELY BORED / LAZY sportswriters and/or opinion writers want to generate more web traffic ......
I’ll believe it when they start having “Monday Night Soccer” in America.
In the USA, soccer has been, and forever will be, considered a girl’s sport.
“What’s the score? Still 0-0? I thought so.”
Oh wait, this is a slideshow with a provocative headline in order to generate hits.
Who watches soccer in the US? Illegals and the families of misguided kids who play it.
That’s why it’s popular among parents of 7 year olds.
But we want our professional athletes to give their all. A fullback crashing into the line. A hockey player dishing out checks.
Sigh...yes. So I've been told by every left-wing globalist since at least the 1970's. Soccer is better the football! Why won't you jingoistic neanderthals realize that?!? The rest of the world loves soccer! We will never be apart of the world community until we embrace it! So even if you don't like it, at least put on a smile and pretend to for the sake of world peace!
But despite 40+ years of trying, Football is, if anything, more popular now that it was back then and Soccer's popularity (or lack thereof) is virtually unchanged. In fact if you want to put on the tinfoil hat, I wonder if a lot of the recent attempts to "neuter" Football through lawsuits and rules to reduce hits, is an attempt to destroy the sport with the though that then we won't have any choice but to watch Soccer.
The top ten reasons football is better than soccer:
10. Soccer is BORING.
1. SOCCER IS EXTREMELY BORING.
Soccer is a girl’s game. Period. It’s also extremely boring. I tried getting interested when Virginia Beach built a sports stadium for a local team. I went to 4 or 5 of their matches. It seemed to me that the game was nothing but passing the ball back and forth for no apparent gain, 99% of the time. Watching soccer wasn’t even a good excuse to sit outdoors and drink beer. I had more fun sitting in my backyard all by myself.
I think another European import has more action. Those runway model shows.
Huh? Doesn't Soccer permit tie games?
Pajama Boy likes soccer
I have noticed that soccer is being pushed harder, and might even be more popular in the US in the past few years. I’ve also noticed that soccer seems to be extremely popular in socialist/communist countries.
Doesn’t mean there is a link, but it doesn’t mean there isn’t a link.
Send it back to the third world where it came from!
Is that why fans of the NFL, for example, have such inferiority complexes about it?
Actually modern soccer was invented by the Brits during the 19th century. When they went around conquering the world and building railroads they brought the game with them.
Wow, when I saw the “Real Clear” heading, I thought it would be okay, like “Real Clear Politics”.
NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THE TEN POINTS HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE MECHANICS OF THE GAME ITSELF. And half of the problems are unique to the NFL.
Some of the commentary was self-contradictory. For instance, we are over-saturated with football, but it’s too bad that NFL teams only get to play 16-20 meaningful games a year.
Pretty much every single one of his complaints is solved without having to resort to watching soccer.
The NHL has everything soccer does (continuous action, satisfying play even when goals aren’t scored, fewer injuries than football, rabid fans), plus international players (if that’s your desire) in two countries, 82 games instead of 38, generous playoff provisions where almost anyone with a winning record gets in, plus an extended playoff round to make sure that a bad team doesn’t make the finals based on luck.
Best of all it is all done at three times the speed of soccer and on skates. That is skill. Heck, even Bo Jackson didn’t pretend to be able to play hockey.
We, in the U.S., prefer our professional athletes to be black. /s
Bingo. The 1994 Cup here in the U.S. was settled by a coin flip, more or less. That’s a clear champion? Until soccer takes itself seriously, it has no right expecting the rest of us to.
12. Can be played on third world dung heaps.
Add to that the "everyone gets a trophy" and "no keeping score" garbage and it's easy to see why it's a continued loser. I hate to offend any soccer fans but, to me it just plain looks wimpy no matter how they try to build it up.
It was the newest shiniest thing in the world of sports. Some people were even predicting it would surpass baseball as Japan's number one sport. But somewhere during that short-lived boom, the shine went off and the Japanese got back to baseball.
They were also giving away free soccer match tickets to all the elementary school kids to help fill the seats. It didn't work so well. I took my kids to one match with the free tickets. It was so boring, more than half of those of us who were half filling the stadium left before half-time.
My daughter’s then boyfriend lost an appointment to West Point because of a brain injury playing hs rugby. I see a lot of the kids wearing soft helmets now.
(referring to Rugby vs. football gear) Point taken. But Rugby isn’t soccer. U.S. football’s roots are in rugby. Even those of us who don’t care to play or watch rugby respect the game, and its players.
As the bumper sticker says: “Give Blood. Play Rugby.”
The Brits never learned to speak english either, ban them both!
Because soccer except at the highest levels is for athletically non gifted or cowardly sailboat shirt children. Its the personification of the wimpification of the US and the world in general. Kids in the US who wash out at baseball beyond 8 or are too frightened to play a contact sport like football, lacrosse , or hockey gravitate towards soccer. You can run around and act like you are in an organized sport but you are actually doing nothing but jogging around in a disorganized mess. The sport is just plain boring, just like tennis(which is in tailspin worldwide). Funny you never see an athlete in any US pro sport woof about soccer, hell even David Beckham has to hang around his emaciated wife's friends for that celbutard factor. Only people defending the sport are former wimpy kids who played that pansy sport.
hahaha! i have had this same conversation with soccer moms the last 10 years or so... to them, soccer is so exciting, something always going on... to me, it does not compare with football, not even baseball... they don't get how i can get into a baseball game... sheesh--with every pitch, every swing, every foul ball, every hit, every play, every fly, every out thrown, my son says, "mom--you experience about seven different emotions in 2 seconds of baseball!" and it is the same with football... every snap... every scramble... every sack, every yard gained, every yard lost, every roll out... every tackle, every catch... the clock running down... every kick, punt, penalty, fumble, interception... i cannot get enough! :)
damn - you so totally win the tagline game
I don't watch soccer, but about a month ago I came across a soccer game on TV and decided to see what it was about.
After watching some of the game I came to the conclusion it would be a good game for us old men to play.
Walking down the field kicking the ball to a fellow team member who would kick it back to you or to someone else on the team. Creeping down the field and when getting close enough kick the ball toward the opponents goal.
If you lose the ball to the opposition you might actually have to do a little running but that is not the worst thing for an old man's health , as long as its a little running. -Tom
There is nothing like the excitement of a 1-0 game. It is fun to play and a good cardiovascular workout but it is unbelievably boring to watch.
Rugby evolved out of soccer, or football as the rest of the world calls it. In a football match, William Webb Ellis caught a football that was kicked at him (Allowed) at Rugby University in 1823. What he did then was not allowed: He ran with the ball. And someone tackled him and they made this into a new game, called Rugby’s game or Rugby football. American football evolved out of rugby. If you go to South Bend, Indiana and visit the college football hall of fame, and go through the time tunnel, you will recognize rugby. Only 2 times has 15 a side been played in the Olympics, and the USA won them both. In the next summer games in Brazil there will be 7 a side rugby, a really fast and high scoring game.
Are gambling and fantasy football as big with soccer overseas? Because right there are two reasons football will be popular despite the good or bad quality of the game itself.
I definitely don’t like the flopping in soccer, same as in NBA. Maybe they have put a stop to that since I tried watching a few years ago. I definitely don’t like the fruity celebratory dances/chest pounding in football after a 300+ lb behemoth collapses on a loose ball in a blowout.
What a pantload. I don’t know who’s worse, some guy who thinks he is a he-man because he played football in H.S., or some guy who pretends that he played football on the internet.
The writer supporting soccer and their fans all probably like cats better than dogs.
Take a moment and take an unbiased look at some of the world's great rivalries, which make anything American sports can conjure look like nerdball by comparison. You'll find that they are about tribalism and tradition, not globalism. To use just one example -- Rangers/Celtic. British crown vs. Irish Republicanism. In short, The Troubles, and a manifestation of a struggle that has gone on since 1690.
Manchester and Leeds have hated each other since the War of the Roses and that carries over into Manchester United vs. Leeds United. That's not globalism.
"But despite 40+ years of trying, Football is, if anything, more popular now that it was back then and Soccer's popularity (or lack thereof) is virtually unchanged."
Since you don't like globalism, perhaps you could explain why the NFL spends so much of its marketing effort globally, an effort soccer mastered long ago. Meanwhile, you now have American networks bidding big bucks to show the English Premiership and Fox puts the UEFA Champions League on as a regular part of its programming. 112 million people watched at least part of the 2010 World Cup in the United States, a 22 percent increase from 2006.
Sure, the NFL is top dog domestically. Nobody disputes that, and MLS has a long way to go before it even comes close. But to simply dismiss soccer isn't correct. It's the wave of the future and you should get used to it.
And here's the other thing I don't get: with the understandable animus toward Mexico on certain parts of this board, why aren't people rooting for the United States to beat Mexico at its own game, the only high-profile sport besides baseball where the countries meet on more or less equal terms?
And the article leaves out the very best thing about soccer as opposed to American sports: promotion and relegation. You do well, you prosper and get promoted. If you don't, you get punished and dropped a league. That's actually a very conservative principle. In American sports, if you stink, don't worry. Just sell your best players and let your crony capitalist owner pocket the money while you try again next year in the same league.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.