Skip to comments.Global warming’s deranged disciples
Posted on 01/12/2014 8:46:05 AM PST by Signalman
CLIMATE change is real and it is happening very fast. The climate of opinion, that is, regarding the rapidly imploding fantasies of the global warming alarmists.
After a decade in which sane commentators have been angered and frustrated by the purblind adherence to the warmist superstition by followers of the Al Gore cult prominent among them our own esteemed First Minister and President for Life Designate the whole climate change scam has ﬁnally degenerated into a joke, provoking widespread derision.
That has not deterred the climate Gnostics, sustained by their mystical insight into inner truths hidden from sceptics (deniers in their language of anathema) and, increasingly, from scientists who have not taken the IPCC shilling. The cultists can rely on the support of politicians since non-existent global warming furnishes the pretext for all-too-existent and exorbitant taxes, which is what the whole myth is all about. Thus, during discussion of the recent ﬂoods in the Commons last week, David Cameron was prompted by the Liberal Democrat MP Tim Farron to attribute the problem to climate change. The Prime Minister dutifully replied: Colleagues across the House can argue about whether that is linked to climate change or not. I very much suspect that it is.
That statement was overdue as it was seven weeks since he had been reported as telling his colleagues We have to get rid of the green crap, an exceptionally long period for Dave to entertain a consistent opinion. Unfortunately, Owen Paterson, the Environment Secretary, refused to endorse his leaders view. Then the Meteorological Oﬃce intervened to contradict Dave: At the moment theres no evidence to suggest that these storms are more intense because of climate change. That was a signiﬁcant development because formerly the Met Oﬃce could be counted upon to support climate alarmism. Clearly it is now conscious of reputational damage and is hedging its bets.
It is not alone. Very subtly, unobtrusively, other institutions and individuals are backing away from the discredited orthodoxy of warmism. The process began some time ago when the Royal Society declared its switch to a more neutral stance in the climate debate. Scientists not committed to the cause by ﬁnancial considerations are growing aware that the imposture is disintegrating so fast it could achieve Piltdown status within their own career spans. It is a measure of the bogus nature of the alleged climate crisis that the last time warming occurred there was a majority Tory government in oﬃce under John Major (Oh, yes!).
Recently the collapse of the scam has accelerated. The Christmas holiday period was enlivened by the hilarious pantomime Anthropogenic Global Warming On Ice, when 52 AGW believers led by Professor Chris Turney embarked on the Russian ship Akademik Shokalsky to study the melting of Antarctic ice. In reality, as they would have known before they set out if they had read Nasa reports, Antarctic sea ice is currently at its largest extent since records began: 19.5 million square kilometres. Their ship became embedded in the ice, as did the Chinese icebreaker sent to rescue them. When their situation became potentially life-threatening, these pioneering climate change gurus experienced the humiliation of having to rely on the leading climate sceptic Anthony Watts and his colleagues for accurate Antarctic weather information to facilitate their rescue by helicopter.
Meanwhile, the United States was in the grip of a polar vortex, with temperatures in all 50 states below freezing and a low of 43C recorded in one area. The Niagara Falls froze into stalactites of ice. This was hailed by True Believers as conclusive evidence of global warming after all, everything is. As a Greenpeace activist famously expressed it: Global warming can mean colder. A heatwave, a ﬂood, a drought, a blizzard, an away win by Partick Thistle all will be determinedly conscripted as evidence of man-made climate change. These people are beyond help. The climate imposture is doomed to end not with a bang but a belly-laugh.
What is totally unamusing, however, is the harm these fanatics and complicit politicians have done, raping the landscape with their hideous wind turbines and imposing crippling taxes. Fuel poverty is killing the elderly. Every winter more people die of hypothermia in Scotland than in Finland. Although the climate madness will have the most lethal consequences in the developing world, it also threatens to impoverish Europe. A government study has shown the lifetime cost of meeting renewables targets across the EU will be £290 billion, more than a quarter of which will be contributed by the UK. Denmark already has the dubious distinction of being the ﬁrst country where green taxes account for more than 50 per cent of an electricity bill. It is not global warming that is killing us but its deranged disciples.
Beware, expletives not deleted. Pretty funny, though.
Haven’t heard anything recently on the ships stuck in the antarctic — have they been freed?
I don't think hyperventilated rhetoric of this type is any better when our side uses it than it is when it is used by our opponents.
Wind turbines are not "rape." The landscape cannot be "raped."
And I don't think wind turbines are hideous to look at. I think the economics of wind energy is dubious, but I happen to like them. I've liked propellers and fans since I was a toddler growing up in the late '50s, and I still like them today.
Granted, not everyone feels that way. But I for one think they're not that horrible.
Dr Michael Mann, the inventor of the infamous hockey stick reasoning, is still employed by Penn State. Where should that hockey stick now be shoved?
The climate hoaxers like to point out melting glaciers as conclusive evidence of AGW. So bogus. I recently watched an old travel series called “Travel Talks” from the 1930s-40s. On one episode, they went to Glacier National Park. The narrator said that scientists claimed the glacier was slowly melting and that over time it would completely disappear. This makes perfect sense. When there is heavy snow in the winter, in the northern US, some snow may persist on the ground and in the shade until May. But eventually it melts in the summer. Likewise, the glaciers are just left over remnants of the ice age, and we are simply experiencing global warming relative to the ice age.
But logic NEVER works on these AGW hoaxers.
Makes my blood boil when I think of how many coal plants have been shuttered in our state, only to reappear in India or China.
Economic suicide. Thank you, Obama.
Yes. A few days ago.
Anyone familiar with mathematics knows the frustration of solving equations with 2 or 3 variables. But we’re virtually “told” to believe these crackpots projecting God knows how many variables to which they claim to know the solutions to.
Man, is this country screwed-up.
Rape can indeed be used in this context. Check your definitions. And your premise that huge towering turbines are aestheticly pleasing is nuttier than fruitcakes, mate.
I guess I have just precisely as much right to my idea of what is aesthetically pleasing as you do, mate.
Who made you boss?
An American Ice Breaker rescued them from the Antarctic summer
That must be why we haven’t heard any more about it.
Your tax money at work.
Just sit right back and you'll hear a tale,
A tale of a fateful trip
That started from this frozen port
Aboard this Russian ship.
The mate was a mighty sailing man,
The skipper effeminate.
Fifty passengers set sail that day
For a three hour tour, a three hour tour.
The climate started getting rough,
The tiny ship was trapped,
If not for the courage of the fearless crew
The Akademik Shokalskiy would be lost, the Akademik Shokalskiy would be lost.
The ship set ground on top of this frozen Antarctic sea With Eco-Nuts
The Skipper too,
The millionaire and his husband,
The movie star
The eco-nut professor and a lesbee-an,
Here on Eco-Nut Isle.
well... I thought it was kind of funny...
Use this line -
...and, increasingly, from scientists who have not taken the IPCC dollar...
- as a replacement for this reference to old UK money, not a reference to a “shill”
...and, increasingly, from scientists who have not taken the IPCC shilling...
A well said Scotsman article.
Are those who find bird-mincers (aka windmills) esthetically pleasing also strongly attracted to shiney objects?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.