And that would be true. That reason was explicit. The mayor did not endorse Christie. THEREFORE the bridge was restricted and tied up. That sort of politics is SOP in certain venues like DC(local), Chicago, Maryland, Nevada, Cakifornia, DC(fedgov), St Louis, Kansas City, and a few etcs.
That is a non sequitur. What does closing the bridge have to do with closing the lanes (see the question asked in the main post).
Sorry let me try that again:
That is a non sequitur. What does closing the bridge have to do with the non endorsement? (see the question asked in the main post).