Posted on 01/15/2014 4:26:24 PM PST by Kevmo
Yup, that’s a big pile of nuts you keep throwing at us.
***Then you’d better not invest in Toyota, nor Mitsubishi, nor anything connected to Navy Space Weapons Research, nor DARPA, nor half a dozen lesser entities and PhD nuclear scientists and electrochemistry luminaries.
I can say that with 100% certainty, blacklight power will never produce a net of a single nanowatt, so I will never have to admit too being wrong, when I say blp is a load of bollocks
delusions
Try again?
Why, are they frauds?
Do your own PTSIFOM homework unless you’re willing to read up on this technology and come up to speed.
Skeptopaths. Luddites. Assholes. Bandwagon joiners. (SLABs)
No, but the controlled-hot-fusion boys are frauds. To the tune of hundreds of $billions of PUBLIC money. And yet, we’re inundated with skeptopaths screaming fraud at $Millions of PRIVATE money. The best self-deceiving fraud involves joining a bandwagon.
Did you ever find out what "Low Energy" means?
Is reading comprehension a problem for you? Or do you expect me to pay for your behind-the-firewall PTSIFOM access?
nomalous Heat Effect has been replicated hundreds of times by more than a
thousand scientists, even in mainstream peer-reviewed journals.
https://springerlink3.metapress.com/content/8k5n17605m135n22/resource-secured/?target=fulltext.pdf&sid=xwvgza45j4sqpe3wceul4dv2&sh=www.springerlink.com
.
Jing-tang He
• Nuclear fusion inside condense matters
• Frontiers of Physics in China
Volume 2, Number 1, 96-102, DOI: 10.1007/s11467-007-0005-8
This article describes in detail the nuclear fusion inside condense
matters—the Fleischmann-Pons effect, the reproducibility of cold fusions,
self-consistency of cold fusions and the possible applications
.
Note that Jing-tang He found there were 14,700 replications of the Pons
Fleischmann Anomalous Heat Effect.
http://www.boliven.com/publication/10.1007~s11467-007-0005-8?q=(%22David%20J.%20Nagel%22)
.
National Instruments is a multibillion dollar corporation that does not
need to stick its neck out for “bigfoot stories”. After noting more than
150 replications, they recently concluded that with so much evidence of
anomalous heat generation...
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/eu_brussels_june_20_2012_concezzi.pdf
Conclusion
• THERE IS AN UNKNOWN PHYSICAL EVENT and there is a need of better
measurements and control tools. NI is playing a role in accelerating
innovation and discovery.
The current state of the science of LENR is that the Pons Fleischmann
Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated and it is an established
scientific fact. But it is not an established ENGINEERING field because the
effect is difficult to generate and there is still some lingering stigma
associated with the field. The level of pathological resistance this field
receives is unconscionable for those of us who seek scientific answers and
engineering solutions.
How many have the record of Rossi?
How many ran experiments like Rossi? Frauds? You're beyond silly.
But pointing out your silly claims is like homework.
***Typical PTSIFOM skeptopath response.
Did you ever find out what “Low Energy” means?
***I never found out what the other poster thought “low energy” means. If you think it is somehow important in the grand scheme of things and in searching for the scientific truth behind LENR, then by all means chase it down.
I see the claim of 14,700 but no list.
I am trying to chase down what you think it means.
How many have the record of Rossi?
***Perhaps about half of them.
How many ran experiments like Rossi?
***About 99% of them.
Frauds?
***Yes. Absolutely. The skeptopath definition of fraud has expanded to someone who hasn’t produced industrial level results. So that includes all the hot-fusion boys. All of them.
You’re beyond silly.
***It is not my definition, it is the definition of your fellow skeptopaths. Thanks for pointing out how willy they are. Perhaps we’ll see you on hot-fusion threads loudly proclaiming how fraudulent these scientists have been? Not very likely.
Back on your meds.
Typical PTSIFOM skeptopath response.
Perhaps your efforts would be better spent on chasing down what others on this thread think, since they’re so reluctant to answer simple hypotheticals as “which is a higher energy density”.... Is 150 more than 110? Seems pretty simple stuff to me, and worth chasing down. But are you chasing that down? No. Perhaps the asshole bandwagon index is too low for such an endeavor.
Then you’re aware of the claim, you know where to get it. Your cohorts have thrown the CAS under the bus, basically claiming that they don’t know how to COUNT. Best of luck, PTSIFOM guy.
Did I say that? No. They have a record. Just like Rossi does. If you want to specify “Legal Record” or more precisely “Criminal Record” then be that precise. The record of hot-fusion fraudboys is the same as Rossi. They push for money and claim they can do something, but when there’s no results they ask for more money. The hot fusion boys are FAR better than Rossi, having pissed away hundreds of $Billions rather than just $millions. So, their record is far worse than Rossi’s. LOL! Back on YOUR meds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.