Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I Cannot Support CCW Permits
Market Ticker ^ | 01/16/2014 | Karl Denniger

Posted on 01/16/2014 10:42:36 AM PST by Rusty0604

According to Filippidis and his wife, Kally, they noticed an unmarked patrol car tailing them while traveling for Christmas and a family wedding in Woodridge, N.J. He claims the police car stayed with them for ten minutes.

“We weren’t speeding. In fact, lots of other cars were whizzing past,” Filippidis told the Tampa Tribune.

Eventually, the car’s emergency lights came on and he pulled the car over. The officer was reportedly with the Transportation Authority Police, “Maryland’s version of the New York-New Jersey Port Authority,” according to the report.

It appears he was pulled over because of either an automated or manual random license-plate look-up by the cops, and when they did so his license was coded, as they all are, to show that he had a CCW permit.

There's nothing unlawful about having a CCW permit nor does it generate probable cause for a traffic stop. That doesn't matter in this case, because it did generate a traffic stop. And then the cop ultimately, when the driver says he doesn't have it with him and his wife (asked separately) doesn't know where it is, turns that stop into a full and complete search of the vehicle and everything in it.

The end result? No arrest or citation, but 90 minutes of being detained and searched.

(Excerpt) Read more at market-ticker.org ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: banglist; denninger; donutwatch; guncontrol; johnfilippidis; policeoversteps; ticker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: bkopto
IF THEY HAVE TO ASK, THEY LIKELY DON’T HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE TO SEARCH. You have NOTHING to gain if you approve to a search.

Police should always ask for consent regardless of probable cause, because if given it removes a huge hurdle to prosecution. Giving consent also gives away a huge tool for your defense attorney of something goes to trial. Challenging searches is one of the first steps in your defense, don't give it away.

21 posted on 01/16/2014 11:23:16 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

I guarantee you this didn’t happen in Texas, or any other red state!


22 posted on 01/16/2014 11:25:07 AM PST by jda ("Righteousness exalts a nation . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jda

Well in Texas they do the occasional roadside cavity search. Not for guns of course.


23 posted on 01/16/2014 11:29:13 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Did the author refuse to endorse Christy?


24 posted on 01/16/2014 11:32:04 AM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Careful, they can try to say they thought you were evading them and use that as probable cause.


25 posted on 01/16/2014 11:32:06 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: maine yankee

Yes...since when do we need anyone’s permission to defend life from evil! Good God! They can kiss my butt if they think I am going to live a life as a victim.


26 posted on 01/16/2014 11:32:43 AM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Make that the subject of the article.


27 posted on 01/16/2014 11:33:02 AM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
There goes any probable cause right out the window.

Wouldn't that depend on the feedback?
A clean report would mean the LEO is left only with whatever he observed, which in the event of a random stop is nothing.
Of course, if something improper comes back it is no longer a random search.

You may mean that the "lookup" itself, similar to an ordinary investigation, is conducted without probable cause and you certainly would be correct. Going one very small step forward, it seems possible that in the near future the response to the "automatic" lookup could include all manner of problems such as failure to file state or fed taxes, over due library books, etc.

28 posted on 01/16/2014 11:33:55 AM PST by frog in a pot (We are all "frogs in a pot" now. How and when will we real Americans jump out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

LOL


29 posted on 01/16/2014 11:34:37 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

The wife was very unhelpful. The best place for people to start is to make sure they have their stories straight at all times. Apparently the driver in this case chose not to carry, but then didn’t tell the Mrs. Poor form.


30 posted on 01/16/2014 11:37:43 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

And not based on the fact that someone has a CCW/CHL.


31 posted on 01/16/2014 11:41:59 AM PST by jda ("Righteousness exalts a nation . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
... Face red, eyes shining, John pounds his knees. “And he wants to put me in jail. He wants to put me in jail. For no reason. He wants to take my wife and children away and put me in jail. In America, how does such a thing happen? ... And after all that, he didn’t even write me a ticket.”

Because you sadly weren't in what most Americans out here in the large unpopulated vaguely-rectangular Western US states regard as 'America'.

Very sorry for you sir. Consider moving.

32 posted on 01/16/2014 11:42:23 AM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

“If you are ever asked to step out of the vehicle, ALWAYS roll up your window,...”

Except if you have power windows and you’ve turned off your car per step one, you have a problem doing that. So...Turn off the engine but leave the ignition turned on so you have power for the windows, etc.? Would that work?


33 posted on 01/16/2014 11:43:49 AM PST by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
The problem is once your name is on the list as owning a gun its never going off. No matter what you do.

Bottom line don't "sign up" to anything that puts your name on an official government list that you own a gun.

I learned that back in the 80s from the movie "Red Dawn"...

34 posted on 01/16/2014 11:47:24 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

CCW isn’t a basis for a Terry stop. I notice these people did receive an apology from the police.


35 posted on 01/16/2014 11:47:39 AM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot

>> You may mean that the “lookup” itself, similar to an ordinary investigation, is conducted without probable cause

Yes exactly.

Some Florida municipalities scan every vehicle entering and leaving. Manalapan comes to mind. They began scanning around 2005 or so.


36 posted on 01/16/2014 11:54:13 AM PST by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

Just a guess here but even if he cancels his CCW, he now is “KNOWN” to have firearms and it may or may not stay on his “permanent” record. Just guessin’ but there may be folks who obtained a CCW using a borrowed firearm and for some reason or other never actually obtained a firearm of their own. Are they now “tagged” as well? And would the “authorit-is” believe them if they were told that?


37 posted on 01/16/2014 11:56:23 AM PST by rktman (Under my plan(scheme), the price of EVERYTHING will necessarily skyrocket! Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

I’m not sure if this press accounts mention it, but the wife’s big fat mouth gave them plenty of probably cause to search.


38 posted on 01/16/2014 12:04:30 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Some questions about this post:

4. An officer has a right to give you a pat-down for safety reasons once out of the vehicle, but you should NEVER CONSENT TO A POLICE SEARCH OF YOUR VEHICLE. Whether you are inside or now standing outside of your vehicle, the first thing you should say once an officer starts asking questions is “AM I BEING DETAINED OR AM I FREE TO GO?“

5. If the officer asks to search your vehicle your only answer should be “I DO NOT CONSENT TO ANY SEARCHES OFFICER.” The officer will do all he can to get you to waive your rights by threatening to call the K9 Unit. Despite the officer’s claims, refusing a search is NOT probable cause for the officer to search your vehicle. Unless an officer sees an illegal item in plain view or has a reasonable suspicion that there is something illegal in the car, he can’t search your vehicle. IF THEY HAVE TO ASK, THEY LIKELY DON’T HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE TO SEARCH. You have NOTHING to gain if you approve to a search.

Questions: Does the officer have the right to detain you while they summon a dog? Is an indication from a dog considered probable cause in which case they can force you to let them see in your car or do they still need to get a warrant?

Thanks.


39 posted on 01/16/2014 12:06:55 PM PST by 2big2fail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2big2fail
Does the officer have the right to detain you while they summon a dog? Is an indication from a dog considered probable cause in which case they can force you to let them see in your car or do they still need to get a warrant?

I've read that you can be resonably detained for up to 30 min. If a dog is involved, and the dog alerts to your car, then this is considered valid probable cause to search your vehicle. So your constitutional rights are decided by a dog! I can easily imagine that the officer performs some unseen trick to cause the dog to alert to you vehicle. This whole system is screwed up.

40 posted on 01/16/2014 12:29:11 PM PST by bkopto (Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson