Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shock: More Black Babies Aborted Than Born Alive in New York
Life News ^ | Ryan Bomberger

Posted on 01/21/2014 7:31:59 AM PST by Morgana

New York’s Governor, Andrew Cuomo, just announced that “right-to-life” advocates have “no place in the state of New York.” The Radiance Foundation and its civil rights allies defy Governor Cuomo’s intolerance and have launched the “DREAM IS DEAD” ad campaign (www.toomanyaborted.com/ny) in New York on Martin Luther King Day.

ryanbomberger26The bold ad campaign declares: “The Dream Is Dead For 56 Million: TooManyAborted.com” reminding the public of Dr. Martin Luther King’s fight to ensure justice for all. Bus transit ads will be seen throughout the state’s capital, Albany, as well as Troy and Schenectady. In 1963 when Martin Luther King Jr. shared his Dream with the nation, he never envisioned an America where ‘reproductive justice’ would end more than 56 million innocent human lives. His dream never pictured a nation where black boys and black girls would never be able to join hands with white boys and white girls, as sisters and brothers, because ‘freedom of choice’ determined some humans are simply not equal.

New York has the second highest abortion rate in America and the second highest total number of abortions, exceeding 100,000 annually. There is obviously no lack of access. Yet, liberal legislators in the state want to decriminalize all abortions allowing the violent procedure through the entire 9 months of pregnancy. Planned Parenthood and a coalition of other pro-abortion groups have joined Governor Cuomo’s quest to enact the “Reproductive Health Act”, part of his “Women’s Equality Act”. This dangerous pro-Gosnell bill will only endanger even more women and their unborn children.

Planned Parenthood continually touts that they gave Martin Luther King their first Margaret Sanger Award in 1966. What they fail to tell the public is that abortion wasn’t legal in ’66. Dr. King wrongly believed birth control would reduce poverty. He also wrongly believed Planned Parenthood was interested in elevating poorer blacks. Their abortion numbers tell a completely different story.

According to the NY State Department of Health, for every 1,000 black babies born alive, 1,223 are aborted. No other racial/ethnic demographic aborts more of their children than are born alive. Yet groups like the NAACP have endorsed this radical bill that will clearly disproportionately impact the black community. The TooManyAborted.com New York campaign will continue to educate the public about this civil rights issue throughout Black History Month.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Health/Medicine; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; blackbabies; margaretsanger; newyork; nyc; prolife
Margaret Sanger's Revenge.
1 posted on 01/21/2014 7:31:59 AM PST by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Margaret Sanger's Revenge.

Margaret Sanger's intent.

According to the NY State Department of Health, for every 1,000 black babies born alive, 1,223 are aborted. No other racial/ethnic demographic aborts more of their children than are born alive.

2 posted on 01/21/2014 7:35:45 AM PST by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The Dream is dead alright.


3 posted on 01/21/2014 7:37:29 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Dem policy:

Step 1 - abort blacks by the millions

Step 2 - import Mexicans by the millions

Question for blacks: What is the goal of this Dem policy?


4 posted on 01/21/2014 7:40:39 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I never knew this :

“Planned Parenthood continually touts that they gave Martin Luther King their first Margaret Sanger Award in 1966”

SOOOO.. he really thought planned parent hood was going to
help black families’ ?!

Soooo. which party has a war on Black Babies, Black women,
and families in-general?


5 posted on 01/21/2014 7:41:02 AM PST by mj1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

You say intent I say revenge but it’s all the same disease.


6 posted on 01/21/2014 7:41:37 AM PST by Morgana (Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The KKK applauds NY in their efforts to reduce the black population.


7 posted on 01/21/2014 7:41:58 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The War on Drugs has been used as an excuse to steal your rights. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Why are they shocked? Had they paid attention to Margret Sanger’s words they would realize this was the plan all along...


8 posted on 01/21/2014 7:42:29 AM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

“Margaret Sanger’s Revenge”

More her dream come true.


9 posted on 01/21/2014 7:42:46 AM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

Mr Crow winks


10 posted on 01/21/2014 7:45:25 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

1223/2223=55%.

We’re getting there! (\PP)


11 posted on 01/21/2014 7:47:26 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Before LBJ’s “War on Poverty,” 6 percent of all births were out of wedlock.
Today, the figure is 41 percent.


12 posted on 01/21/2014 7:51:13 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks ("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Make ‘em out of wedlock and then there is only one to convince to have an abortion rather than two. Makes it so much easier to do your work! (/s)


13 posted on 01/21/2014 7:53:36 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

So true.
Sanger was all about murdering little Black babies. Little brown babies. Little red babies. Little yellow babies. Little poor babies. Little “imperfect” babies.

Sanger was a rotten, disgusting, soul-less, twisted, evil bitch.

Pure and simple.


14 posted on 01/21/2014 7:59:14 AM PST by Thumper1960 (A modern so-called "Conservative" is a shadow of a wisp of a vertebrate human being.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Bump


15 posted on 01/21/2014 8:14:18 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

The black population is still reproducing at higher rate than white or Asian, total lifetime fertility per black woman, 2.0, white, 1.8, Asian, 1.7, Hispanic, 2.4.

Contraception can shrink a population even more effectively than abortion.


16 posted on 01/21/2014 8:19:25 AM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Planned Parenthood, the Klu Klux Klan of modern times.

Planned Parenthood has killed more BLACKS than the Klan ever dreamed of.

Yet, BLACKS overwhelmingly supports the party that supports their genocide.

17 posted on 01/21/2014 8:23:26 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Not to mention the bastardity rate...

Isn’t it something like 90%?


18 posted on 01/21/2014 8:24:38 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Yesterday, a thread featured Star Parker's column about the pro-abortion forces' fierce objection to the First Amendment's "free speech" provisions when it comes to abortion matters.

Cuomo's recent comments highlight Parker's point. Silencing the voices who believe that life and liberty are inseparably entwined by the Creator is essential to those who fear that if people of faith hear that truth, they will reject "progressive" advocacy of destroying life in the womb is what compels this objection to free speech for abortion's propronents.

At this particular point America's history, the liberty and personal freedom of every citizen, including minority citizens, clearly are threatened by the reigning Administration's interpretations of the Constitution and resulting policies.

Abortion statistics cited above tend to indicate that minorities are, perhaps, harmed to an even greater degree.

Under the Founders' Constitution, the "freedom of speech" protection was understood to apply to political speech. They made it clear in their writings, their speeches, and their lives, that freedom of conscience, and the freedom to express contesting ideas was uppermost in their minds when they drafted and adopted the Constitution and its Amendments.

Out of the philosophy clearly stated in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution was framed; and the foundation of that document was based on the idea most concisely stated by Thomas Jefferson:

"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them." - Thomas Jefferson

Parker observes: "It’s no surprise why pro-abortion forces in America don’t want free speech when it comes to raising awareness about this issue of, literally, life and death"

Her next sentence, " The more people understand the reality of abortion, the more they don’t want it as a legal, easily accessible part of American life." incorporates two concepts:

1. The reality of abortion which relates to providing what might be described as "full disclosure" to the person (shall we call that person the "mother"?) as to the physical attributes of that which is to be "aborted" at the time of the procedure, and of the exact description of the procedure which is involved by way of an ultra-sound and other materials. For instance, the current stories and pictures of the lovely and well-formed little "child" delivered at 18 weeks and lovingly cared for by his "mother," "father," and "siblings," until his death, might destroy their carefully-constructed indefinite "fetus" argument.

2. The reality of abortion as to its relationship to America's Constitutional protections, as "intended by those who framed it and to those who adopted it." (Jefferson)

An honest "free speech" setting for dealing with No. 2 certainly should include the core idea of America's philosophical foundations, as summarized by Jefferson's, "The God who gave us life" summary and the Judeo-Christian belief about the Creator from which it was derived.

Reading that statement again, the terms "life" and "liberty," along with the concluding words, take on new meaning, and might, if freely and openly debated in connection to the idea of "abortion," might tend to sway public opinion. Let's read them again:

"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty also: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them." - Thomas Jefferson

Is there any wonder why opposition to "free speech" about the abortion debate is so rampant among the pro-abortion forces? The same Creator acknowledged by the Founders (see Jefferson) to have endowed individuals with a "gift of reason" exists today, and though "progressives" may fail to acknowledge it, their fear of free and open debate on such an important subject may be telling.

When one looks at the statistics on this thread's article, one wonders if the cavalier attitude about the value and meaning of life exemplified by those statistics may contribute also to the high crime rates in communities victimized by that attitude.

At the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington DC in February, 1994, Mother Teresa stated:

“And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?"

This is a question which might be asked of every community in America.

19 posted on 01/21/2014 8:33:05 AM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Dems don’t care. It’s what they want.


20 posted on 01/21/2014 8:48:43 AM PST by grimalkin (We are a nation under God. If we ever forget this, we are a nation gone under. -Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960
In the interest of accuracy, Margaret Sanger was an advocate of birth control but was an outspoken opponent of abortion except in the case of a mother's life being endangered.

She certainly was a racial eugenicist, which is bad enough; there is nothing to be gained by exaggerating the facts.

21 posted on 01/21/2014 8:54:16 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I was watching the tv show THE FIRST 48. A young black man had been shot. He left behind a child. The young black woman’s family referred to the dead young man as “the Baby Father”. The parents of the dead young man referred to the young woman as “The Baby Mother”. Not husband or wife or boyfriend or girlfriend. Interesting.


22 posted on 01/21/2014 9:00:10 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard; Thumper1960
Hinckley, I have certainly read Margaret Sanger's words that she was opposed to abortion, but I am not sure whether to take them at face value.

Truly unsure.

I say this because as late as 1962, PP was marketing contraception as being "not abortion," because "abortion takes the life of a baby" --- while they were simultaneously lobbying for decriminalization of abortion, which they called "abortion reform."

As early as 1920, Sanger was simultaneously calling abortion "vicious and dangerous," AND defending it as women's ultimate weapon against unwanted childbearing:

“The only weapon that women have and the most uncivilized weapon that they have to use if they will not submit to having children every year or every year and a half, the weapon they use is abortion. . . . What does this mean? It means it is a very bad sign if women have to indulge in it, and it means they are absolutely determined that they cannot continue bringing children into the world that they cannot clothe, feed, and shelter. It is woman’s instinct, and she knows herself when she should and should not give birth to children, and it is just as natural to trust that instinct and to let her be the one to say and much more natural than it is to leave it to some unknown God for her to judge her by.”(MS, “Debate On Birth Control: First Speech,” Dec. 12, 1920 [MSM S76:0923 ].)

Then there's this, 1923:

"The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race (Eugenics Publishing Co., 1923)

It's probably more accurate to say she was "inconsistent" or "ambivalent."

Sanger died in 1966.

23 posted on 01/21/2014 9:38:28 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("See something, say something.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

You are wrong!

In her own words, Sanger advocated the right of a woman to abort for ANY reason!


24 posted on 01/22/2014 9:51:52 AM PST by ShamrockCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

fer later


25 posted on 02/21/2014 11:43:14 AM PST by Rightly Biased (Avenge me Girls AVENEGE ME!!!! ( I don't have any son's))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson