Skip to comments.FLASHBACK: NASA say green house gasses to cause FEWER polar outbreaks!
Posted on 01/27/2014 6:13:20 AM PST by Bulwinkle
As the abundance of greenhouse gases gradually increases, planetary waves no longer break up the Arctic vortex as often. The frequency of Northern Hemisphere sudden stratospheric warmings is reduced.
(Excerpt) Read more at giss.nasa.gov ...
Yes, but that was before the enlightenment spawned by NASA’s Muslim outreach.
Good find. Although I think before we can really call it a falsification of the theory we’ll need a run of winters with the polar vortex breaking up and parts of it drifting south. I think we’ve had at least two recently — the last one(s) we didn’t hear about because our news and weather services are so insular, but I seem to recall that Europe and Russia had extra cold winters for a couple of years when we didn’t.
The question is...fourteen years later...where is this guy, and who is sponsoring him through life?
The really positive? Maybe we’d be in turbo-arctic-vortex right now....if it wasn’t for all that terrible green-house gas stuff.
The movie “Inconvenient Truth” seems to have missed all of these polar vortex events, lack of hurricanes, massive snowfall, record cold etc. Funny how it missed so many things.
I’m thinking of watching it with the kids so they can see how all the foolish predictions have failed. In fact, nature is going in the other direction completely!
Too much government trying to find relevancy. Remember NASA’s ozone hole, the end of the planet as we know it. It went all away with Bush I being forced to signed CFC ban, which of course did nothing with all the emerging economies..
I think what this article is saying disagrees with what the AGW crowd is saying now. They are connecting these artic vortexes to manmade global warming. They want it both ways.
anthropogenic global warming ( AGW)
Man thinks he can control God’s creation. I don’t thinks so.
Thanks for the post.
There are at least two errors in the article. Figure 2 has the same graphic for the arctic for % loss and for DU. It also defines DU as moleclules/cm2 instead of cm3.
EVERYTHING about globull warming is a scam about wealth redistribution and huge sums of tax payer grant funding.
Of course they can have it both ways. It seems even the scientists involved in AGW aren’t hard-core Popperians, who really believe in falsification tests. (As a Popperian, myself, I’m being charitable in not putting scorn quotes around the word “scientist”.) And, AGW having long since become an almost religious ideology, rather than proper science, as happened with Freudian psychoanalysis, just as with Freudianism, everything will be trumpeted as “proof” of the theory.
in the same year the US military issued a report telling how Globull Warming would lead to unrest around the world and require US intervention to blah, blah, blah....
Studies show and Experts say....
What is needed at this point is to take a single source, like NASA or NASA+GISS, and do a timetable of their bad projections. Kind of a year by year summary of how their “science” keeps changing over time, yet still not happening.
If such timetables were developed for each of the major players in the scheme, it would do much to show how ludicrous their whole racket has become.
Who has that picture of Al Gore’s frigid selfie? That might be appropriate for this thread.
Good find, thanks for sharing!