Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blocked party: NFL bars host town from using 'Super Bowl' name
foxnews ^ | 01/31/14 | Perry Chiaramonte

Posted on 01/31/2014 9:11:37 AM PST by Doogle

Super Bowl XLVIII's hometown has a rude guest.

The sports world is converging on East Rutherford (pop. 8,978) for Sunday's game between the Denver Broncos and the Seattle Seahawks, and all the town wanted to do was have a little block party for locals not rich or lucky enough to have tickets.

The NFL can't stop the party, but they did bar East Rutherford from using the phrase "Super Bowl" in any description of the humble event, set to take place Sunday afternoon in the shadow of the town's most famous building, MetLife Stadium.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Local News; Music/Entertainment; Sports
KEYWORDS: nfl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last
*SMILES*....little town we used as a turn around back in the 60's when cruising in our cars. The little gazebo should be off to the left in the photo
1 posted on 01/31/2014 9:11:37 AM PST by Doogle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chode

ping


2 posted on 01/31/2014 9:12:26 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

In typical Jersey “Scroo Ya!” fashion, they are likely to rename their town “Super Bowl, NJ”.


3 posted on 01/31/2014 9:13:51 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

The non profit NFL which pays Roger Goodell $200 million per year.


4 posted on 01/31/2014 9:14:33 AM PST by nhwingut (This tagline is for lease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The “Consummate Basin”.


5 posted on 01/31/2014 9:15:52 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

We go through this every year. There’s always somebody that doesn’t understand trademarks, or the courts long list of ruling that require trademark holders to strongly enforce them (basically block and sue everybody they encounter breaking them) or lose them. Don’t ever advertise anything as a Super Bowl party, or a NCAA Tournament party, or any kind of trademark you don’t hold party, because if the holder finds out they HAVE to shut you down.


6 posted on 01/31/2014 9:15:59 AM PST by discostu (I don't meme well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu

If I have to hear “The Big Game” one more time, I’m going to lose it.


7 posted on 01/31/2014 9:16:54 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
Superior Bowl XLVIII
8 posted on 01/31/2014 9:16:58 AM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers
Canadian Liberals Have Shuttered A Forum Modeled On Free Republic
The Charge Is Libel
But Free Dominion Was Closed For Telling The Truth
Please Support Free Republic And Donate!


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

9 posted on 01/31/2014 9:17:35 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
I don't think they can do that.

I suppose we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. ;-)

10 posted on 01/31/2014 9:17:46 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

This all started when a group of sodomites organized the “Gay Olympics” and the IOC successfully sued them.


11 posted on 01/31/2014 9:18:33 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Encourage the NFL to trademark it, then nobody will be able to use it ;)


12 posted on 01/31/2014 9:19:20 AM PST by discostu (I don't meme well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

If it were me on the receiving end of this pettiness, I’d change it to something REALLY vulgar and profane.


13 posted on 01/31/2014 9:19:28 AM PST by Edward Teach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

$29.5 million, and we don’t begrudge others’ salaries around here. One of the reasons he can take home that kind of bacon is by protecting the trademark.


14 posted on 01/31/2014 9:19:55 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: discostu

I was just thinking, how long until the NFL also trademarks, ‘The Big Game’?


15 posted on 01/31/2014 9:20:01 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
the NFL is evil.....when you're all watching the hype just remember that....

and remember what they did to Rush and how they push their favorite political causes and their implicit support of bammey boy and his ilk....it makes me sick...

16 posted on 01/31/2014 9:20:43 AM PST by cherry (.in the time of universal deceit, telling the truth is revolutionary.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Well, they don’t sue the newspapers for reporting on the game, do they?

Maybe, just to be safe, the newspapers should not use any trademarks. They could put a big headline saying “Team from Colorado Wins Important Football Game”, and write the whole article not mentioning any trademarked names.


17 posted on 01/31/2014 9:22:06 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Considering that the NCAA decided it owns elimination trees during the basketball tournament it’s not that crazy an idea.


18 posted on 01/31/2014 9:22:39 AM PST by discostu (I don't meme well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

It’s all about what is being advertised and how that ties into fair use. When a newspaper reports on the Super Bowl they are, in effect, advertising the Super Bowl. When some town or church or club wants to hold a party they’re advertising themselves. I can use your logo to advertise (or to discuss) you, I can’t use your logo to advertise me.


19 posted on 01/31/2014 9:28:06 AM PST by discostu (I don't meme well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I was just thinking, how long until the NFL also trademarks, ‘The Big Game’?

The XFL did. Their championship was called "The Big Game at the End of the Season".


20 posted on 01/31/2014 9:31:31 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Just refer to it as the “ultimate last game of the football season”.


21 posted on 01/31/2014 9:32:24 AM PST by ro_dreaming (Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. ItÂ’s been found hard and not tried')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
"$29.5 million, and we don’t begrudge others’ salaries around here."

I don't begrudge him his salary I do begrudge the NFL their tax FREE status. I am against crony capitalism as much or more than over taxation.

22 posted on 01/31/2014 9:34:29 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

With you there!


23 posted on 01/31/2014 9:35:44 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I was just thinking, how long until the NFL also trademarks, ‘The Big Game’?

Cal and Stanford would have a problem with that unless Goodell plans to play the tuba.


24 posted on 01/31/2014 9:35:52 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: discostu
We go through this every year. There’s always somebody that doesn’t understand trademarks, or the courts long list of ruling that require trademark holders to strongly enforce them (basically block and sue everybody they encounter breaking them) or lose them. Don’t ever advertise anything as a Super Bowl party, or a NCAA Tournament party, or any kind of trademark you don’t hold party, because if the holder finds out they HAVE to shut you down.

No they don't. Instead of being schmucks, they could have sold them a license to use the trademark for that event for $1.

25 posted on 01/31/2014 9:40:15 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
This all started when a group of sodomites organized the “Gay Olympics” and the IOC successfully sued them.

Should'a been the HOMOLIMPICS!

HOMOSEXUAL, because there's nothing GAY about it.

26 posted on 01/31/2014 9:41:40 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
Cal and Stanford would have a problem with that unless Goodell plans to play the tuba.

They'll just pay them off, like the Seahawks paid off A&M for using "The 12th Man."

27 posted on 01/31/2014 9:41:41 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
I do begrudge the NFL their tax FREE status

Which in part explains why they've gone so PC. "Nice tax free status you got there, hate to see anything happen to it."

28 posted on 01/31/2014 9:42:54 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
I suppose we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.

Isn't that what Ted said when Mary Jo said she thought she might be pregnant?

29 posted on 01/31/2014 9:43:56 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
No problem.


30 posted on 01/31/2014 9:44:59 AM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

If they had asked first they might have been able to get it. But they went the violation path first, now the trademark must be protected.


31 posted on 01/31/2014 9:46:25 AM PST by discostu (I don't meme well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Well on my Snper Bowl party sign..that “n” is loose and keeps spinning


32 posted on 01/31/2014 9:48:43 AM PST by tophat9000 (Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
Somebody's head is getting too big for their helmet. Hope it's a snoozer.
33 posted on 01/31/2014 9:50:17 AM PST by McGruff (I'm a Conservative. Not necessarily a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

...wish I had a dollar for every sign in mid town Manhattan that has “Super Bowl” on it....


34 posted on 01/31/2014 9:51:56 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Yep same thing they are doing to the churches. Oh no tax free status for you if you preach politics from the pulpit at election time. Unless you back the correct candidates of course.

Wait until they use it to force gay marriages to happen in the church!

35 posted on 01/31/2014 9:54:22 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Edward Teach

“Stupor Bowl” works well since so many drink before, during, and after the game.


36 posted on 01/31/2014 9:54:49 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; me = independent conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: discostu

I agree with you.

I used to work at Caterpillar Tractor. They were and still are very very aggressive in pursuing their trademark. And so guess what? No one uses “Caterpillar” or “Cat” remotely with their products. Those are exclusive trademarks of Caterpillar.

I see a lot of these postings where the person writing the article is trying to drum up something to get a rise out of us.

The other day someone posted a child’s home made cupcakes being shut down because the board of health said they were in violation of their food preparation codes. The article written like the big bad govt came in and shut down this poor kid’s cupcake business. Hey, it’s the law. If someone were to eat the cupcake and get sick then what?

Take to the next level, O’Reilly who goes on his show two days ago ranting about how the republicans are making a mistake by opposing the minimum wage limit to $10. Forget the fact that just about anyone with any horsesense can see that the min wage law helps unions, and not the entry level worker. In fact, it reduces jobs by forcing companies to automate these entry level jobs.

In short, I wish people would stop posting articles that are stupid in the first place.


37 posted on 01/31/2014 9:57:26 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Of course for many years the NFL did not enforce the trademark, later changed their minds, yet still retain the rights despite knowingly allowing thousands of groups to use it.


38 posted on 01/31/2014 9:58:29 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
The non profit NFL which pays Roger Goodell $200 million per year.

That's a great point. By law, how can the NFL be "non-profit" and enjoy protection of copyright infringement. I thought Copyright laws were specifically intended to protect the rights of a proprietor against potential profits made by others with their ideas/products.

I'm not a lawyer but I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express before.

39 posted on 01/31/2014 9:58:54 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (My whimsical litany of satyric prose and avarice pontification of wisdom demonstrates my concinnity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

I think someone with some money should trademark “Global Warming”, “Climate Changes”, and several others. Then they should vigorously protect their trademarks and not let anyone mention them.


40 posted on 01/31/2014 10:02:53 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (My whimsical litany of satyric prose and avarice pontification of wisdom demonstrates my concinnity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

No, the Olympics won.


41 posted on 01/31/2014 10:03:48 AM PST by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

What it generally boils down to in trademark enforcement is specific knowledge. If you specifically find out somebody is violating your trademark you have to go after them, if you don’t know about the specific you can’t be expected to enforce. Which is the problem of the internet age, before the internet every other town, church and club in the country could hold a Super Bowl party and the league could reasonably be expected to not hear about any of them because NYC based operations didn’t tend to hear much about the goings on in Sheboygan Wisconsin. Now in the internet age there’s no such thing as local news or events, if one guy in the league office has a story about some party hit his news feed there’s now multiple records that the league “knew” about the party. They no longer have the ability to say “we didn’t know”, which gives them the obligation to enforce.


42 posted on 01/31/2014 10:06:24 AM PST by discostu (I don't meme well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Nonprofit organizations trademark stuff all the time, otherwise any idiot could put up a “March of Dimes” bucket on their counter and collect money and keep it and the real March of Dimes would have no recourse. Do you want your favorite charity to not be able to protect their logo from scammers? Then you’re OK with nonprofits using trademark protection.


43 posted on 01/31/2014 10:13:40 AM PST by discostu (I don't meme well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: discostu

If they stated “Town party to celebrate the Super Bowl(TM)” it should be fine. And then in fine print “Super Bowl is a trademark of the National Football League.”


44 posted on 01/31/2014 10:26:55 AM PST by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

With his salary no wonder Goodell’s wife quit Fox News...

(Jane Skinner is Mrs Goodell)


45 posted on 01/31/2014 10:27:28 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (Amnesty And Not Ending ObamaCare Will Kill GOP In 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: discostu

I guess you’re not old enough to remember all the national ad campaigns with Super Bowl promos for which the NFL did nothing to stop. When they started charging for official NFL sponsorship the companies ponying up started to complain. So as usual the NFL gets to have it both ways. When it’s to their benefit they do nothing. When it’s in their benefit to act, they “vigorously defend their trademark.” Just please don’t give us the pious baloney about trademark laws.


46 posted on 01/31/2014 10:36:57 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Why don’t they call it “The Souper Bowl” and have everyone bring a can of soup.

.


47 posted on 01/31/2014 10:41:54 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

They were also influenced by other legal cases that if you allowed your trademark to fall into generic use (Kleenex, Jell-O, Band-Aid, etc.) you stood the risk of losing it.


48 posted on 01/31/2014 10:45:31 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Exactly how long was that supposed to take ? Two or three centuries? I mean it wasn’t like they let it slide a season or two.


49 posted on 01/31/2014 10:52:49 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
Years ago a lawyer sent me a FEDEX letter with a demand that I cease and desist using "rus" at the end of my company's website address as his client Toys-R-Us had trademarked the "R-Us" and I did not have their permission to use it.

My company's website was the single word, "controls" and the "rus" was attached to the end of the word making it "controlsrus."

After a bit of back and forth on how we felt were not using the "R-Us" in the manner that had been trademarked, he persisted in further informing me of an impending lawsuit against my company if I did not cease and desist immediately!

I finally got him to quit harassing me when I told him to get back to me when he got the Tyrannasau-R-Us Rex to change it's name, along with all the other dinosaurs that were infringing upon his client's trademark.

Never heard another word from the creep.

50 posted on 01/31/2014 11:02:28 AM PST by N. Theknow (Kennedys-Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat-But they know what's best for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson