Skip to comments.Medved: White House Protection for Black-Out Drunks
Posted on 01/31/2014 6:25:40 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine
Do American young women deserve a sacred, federally-protected right to engage in reckless, irresponsible and even illegal behavior with no fear of consequences?
Vice President Biden seems to think so.
After a White House meeting in January to announce a new task force to curb sexual assaults on campus, the ever-effusive VEEP declared that every woman should expect such federal protection no matter what shes wearing, no matter whether shes in a bar, in a dormitory, in the back seat of a car, on a street, drunk or sober.
His remarks accompanied the release of a new report by the White House Council on Women and Girls, suggesting that victims of sexual assaults on university campuses are often abused while theyre drunk, under the influence of drugs, passed out or otherwise incapacitated.
Since most students at university campuses are below the legal drinking age of 21, shouldnt the White House do-gooders also warn against the dangers of illegal drinking and drug abuse that would lead so many of our daughters to become incapacitated at college parties?
To pose these questions doesnt mean ignoring the very real problem of women who face unwanted, sometimes violent advances from brutish and anti-social males. The big new White House report, entitled Rape and Sexual Assault: A Renewed Call to Action claims that one in five university students will experience such incidents during their years on campus, but only 12 percent of them report the bad behavior. At times, this failure to go to the authorities no doubt stems from the victims knowledge that their own conduct in boozing to excess, or blacking out, naked, in someones bedroom, may have contributed to their painful experiences.
University administrators across the country already try to send a clear message that a females provocative, self-destructive or ambiguous behavior doesnt give a man any right to assault or molest her. Males who nonetheless take advantage of such situations should rightly face stern, sure punishment from campus authorities and local law enforcement. But its hard to see a pressing need for a sweeping new federal initiative complete with a task force of senior administration officials and passionate endorsements by both the president and the vice president.
Obviously, there is an appropriate and necessary federal role in curbing sex assaults in the military since armed forces personnel are, by definition, federal employees. But theres no logical reason to believe that only Washington big-wigs and the White House itself can effectively handle the job of protecting college students from unwanted advances on their campuses, both public and private, in every corner of the country.
President Obama gave the new task force just 90 days to recommend best practices for colleges to prevent and respond to assaults, and to check that they are complying with current legal obligations.
It remains unclear whether those obligations include enforcement of ubiquitous state and local laws against underage drinking and illegal drugging, but the remarks surrounding the new initiative suggest that the White House will remain protective, if not solicitous, of such dubious behavior.
This much ballyhooed program amounts to so much bally-hooey. It isnt just an example of federal over-reach. It also shows the highest officials of our government sending messages to a younger generation that may do more to exacerbate than to solve a painful problem.
Does this prosecution include lesbos who “initiate” drunken girls into homosexuality on campus?
but that isn't possible. People should learn to make good choices -- because all of your choices have consequences.
This is hypocritical of the Obama administration who let Roman Polanski walked. It wasn’t “rape rape” to ply a 13 year old girl with liquor and drugs and ignore her cries of “NO NO” as she was anally and orally sodomoized.
She sees no point in further court action but she is still adamant that she was raped and that she did not consent to the violation.
I hear former prez Clintoon wrote the forward.
You do have a right to make stupid or foolish decisions.
You don’t have a right to be shielded from the consequences of those decisions.
I was robbed at gun point one night while walking home (and not in a drunken stupor). I was repeatedly called nigger.
A few days later, when I went to the DPS office to replace my license, the first thing I was asked was what was I doing out so late?
So we can’t ask a rape victim what she was wearing or if she’d led on her date rapist attacker but it’s okay and garden variety questioning to blame a violent robbery victim for his situation. Same as the signs you see downtown posted by the city saying it’s YOUR responsibility to hide your valuables out of plain sight in your car. Like you are “enticing” criminal activity.
Liberals suck. Really really suck.
Drink Multi colored Dye Infused Soy Milk...and Puke at will... in direction of attacker...
I had a girlfriend in college who liked to get drunk. Then she would start kissin’ on me and stuff. Good thing I’m not in college today.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.