So they arent subject to the jurisdiction thereof until they are caught.
That's not what I said.
posted on 02/01/2014 9:02:04 AM PST
(I'd rather be at Philmont)
Its what I said. It defies common sense to claim a person is subject to a jurisdiction if there is no record of their presence.
posted on 02/01/2014 9:04:14 AM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson