Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Need Freeper Recommendations On Vietnam War Info Sources/sites/books
2/20/2014

Posted on 02/20/2014 2:20:18 PM PST by icwhatudo

My child is doing a paper on the reasons we were unable to stop communism from spreading to South Vietnam. I was hoping you could suggest some good sources/websites/books for a young conservative interested in the real story of Vietnam.

I remember one site on FR years ago ("helicopter pilot" or something) that had all kinds of polls showing things were opposite from what Hollywood would have you believe like: support for the war was high, that service members were proud, that returning vets were less likely to use drugs/commit crimes, etc etc.


TOPICS: Books/Literature; History
KEYWORDS: vietnam
Thanks in advance!
1 posted on 02/20/2014 2:20:19 PM PST by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

No More Vietnams by Richard Nixon. Great book telling the full history.


2 posted on 02/20/2014 2:21:38 PM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

It would help to know the age/grade of your child for making recommendations.


3 posted on 02/20/2014 2:22:20 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

The Twenty-Five Year Century
In the Jaws of History

Just for starters.


4 posted on 02/20/2014 2:24:40 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

High school, honors program


5 posted on 02/20/2014 2:24:43 PM PST by icwhatudo (Low taxes and less spending in Sodom and Gomorrah is not my idea of a conservative victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

“The Best and the Brightest” by David Halberstam.


6 posted on 02/20/2014 2:32:27 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
... the reasons we were unable to stop communism from spreading to South Vietnam.


7 posted on 02/20/2014 2:42:00 PM PST by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind, but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

ping


8 posted on 02/20/2014 2:45:00 PM PST by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
For much of the background to understand the Anti-War movement, David Horowitz - Radical Son.

Horowitz was the author of much of the propaganda of the Left during the Vietnam War.

9 posted on 02/20/2014 2:45:44 PM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Gerald Ford Presidential Library should have some interviews with the late former President, President when Saigon fell.

In television interviews he correctly states that the post-Watergate Democrat Congress "lost its guts."

Had Richard Nixon not resigned, or, more properly, had not been abjectly paranoid about the press attention given to Senator McGovern in 1972 and diddled Larry O'Donnell's office at the Watergate, and then lied about it on tape, Saigon might not have been allowed to fall after the U.S. pull out.

Many of us here could "go on and on."

10 posted on 02/20/2014 2:52:14 PM PST by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
My child is doing a paper on the reasons we were unable to stop communism from spreading to South Vietnam

ROE, hard to win a war when the US government (the WH) would not allow us to win it. The containment of the spread of communism was a lie. The Vietnam war was solely about making money for the military industrialists. When America caught on to the lie, the riots and protests that ensued divided the country.

11 posted on 02/20/2014 2:57:29 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

TRIUMPH FORSAKEN by Mark Moyar.


12 posted on 02/20/2014 3:11:54 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

You should have your son/daughter first study why America’s left vehemently opposed our entry into WWII *until* Hitler invaded the USSR.From there he/she can just follow the dots.Of course these dots lead to Chronkite...Fulbright (BillyBob’s mentor)...Kerry....and Ayers among others.


13 posted on 02/20/2014 3:51:11 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obama: "I can do whatever I want")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

5 Star website that pulls hundreds of sources together.

http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fac/Thomas.Pilsch/Vietnam.html


14 posted on 02/20/2014 3:55:37 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windcliff

“Why Vietnam?” Archemedes Patti. Interesting early account of OSS ops in Indochina during and after WWII. An OSS agent himself, Patti paints a picture of a Ho Chi Minh who very much would have preferred cordial relations with the West and particularly the US. Though the Truman admin fed those who would become the Vietnamese back to the French with the Japs kicked out, and...well, we all know the rest. Or should.


15 posted on 02/20/2014 4:05:34 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: drypowder
The containment of the spread of communism was a lie. The Vietnam war was solely about making money for the military industrialists.

You're full of donkey dung. After Nixon resigned the communists knew that Ford would never recommit troops to SE Asia. Absence the US presence there, the communists rolled through the entire area. They weren't interested in conquest. They wanted annihilation.

They killed tens of millions. I knew refugees from the area. Laos. Cambodia. South Vietnam.

The American soldier was the only thing standing between those people and outer darkness.

You don't know what you're talking about. Do us a favor and shut up.

16 posted on 02/20/2014 4:18:47 PM PST by LouAvul (In a state of disbelief as to how liberals destroyed America in a mere 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
…the reasons we were unable to stop communism from spreading to South Vietnam.

Short answer:
Because we left.

After NVN and the VC were so badly beaten they could no longer field an effective combat force, they agreed to peace accords and we conducted an orderly departure.

With our departure, the left in our Democrat Congress refused to continue to continue to provide SVN with military support.

The NVN and the VC were able to rebuild their forces within 2 years whereupon they ignored the accords and invaded SVN.

Your son needs to realize, if he doesn't already, that the folks frantically climbing the stairs to the embassy rooftop and trying to get on the helicopters a few years after we left, were not US personnel but locals who had worked with the US earlier who were then in a new danger. Of course, the left marks that photo as evidence “we lost”.

17 posted on 02/20/2014 4:45:47 PM PST by frog in a pot (We are all "frogs in a pot" now. How and when will we real Americans jump out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War [Harry G. Summers]

Strategy for Defeat: Vietnam in Retrospect [U.S. Grant Sharp]

Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam [H. R. McMaster]


18 posted on 02/20/2014 4:48:48 PM PST by Pelham (If you don’t deport it’s amnesty by default.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam by Major General H. R. McMaster, an interesting look into the decision making process by the Johnson administration
We Were Soldiers Once...and Young: Ia Drang - The Battle That Changed the War in Vietnam by Lt. Colonel Harold Gregory (Hal) Moore & Joseph L. Galloway, gripping account of one of the early battles of the war, probably the most riveting combat experience book I have read.
19 posted on 02/20/2014 4:53:15 PM PST by Amagi (Lenin: "Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Archimedes Patti was full of poop when it came to Ho Chi Minh. Ho was a founding member of the French Communist Party in 1920 and played Patti for a fool.


20 posted on 02/20/2014 4:54:05 PM PST by Pelham (If you don’t deport it’s amnesty by default.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/aureview/1974/jan-feb/hasdorff.html

Vietnam in Retrospect
An Interview with Ambassador Frederick E. Nolting, Jr.


21 posted on 02/20/2014 5:08:42 PM PST by Pelham (If you don’t deport it’s amnesty by default.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

I lived near there during that time. My dad was the guy in Saigon at the embassy, on the news every night, doing the press conferences, that some people called the “5 O’Clock Follies”.

A friend of the family wrote an e-book about that time that may have been the most dispassionate examination of life on the ground I have ever seen. His name is John Campbell and I think people should give a look at his write-up, which I believe was titled, “Are We Winning, Are They Winning?”. I don’t have it nearby to check the title.

I think a fundamentally underestimated book that says important things about the Vietnam War is Charles Kuralt’s autobiography, “A Life On The Road”. Everybody should read it that has not, to better understand what became of American TV news, but with respect to the Vietnam War, he makes a concise statement: something like, “I wonder what Lt. Soon might have said about that.” It would open your youngster’s eyes to read what Charles Kuralt, the guy that began CBS television news broadcasts, and what John Campbell, the guy that worked with A Teams, have to say about long-forgotten aspects of that terrible war.

Kuralt’s book is the most important book, with respect to explaining where we are today. It documents the rise of Cronkite and Rather, two guys that never did the leg-work for the “news” they spoke over the microphones. Kuralt became beloved as the folksy guy on Sunday morning, but most of us do not know that his shiny head didn’t work well on early TV and that he was the original news guy on TV that brought America actual news, by going into the field and gathering it. Kuralt lived in Vietnam and traveled with Lt. Soon’s unit, whereas, Cronkite sat in a bar in Saigon and declared the war lost, after the Tet Offensive, when the North Vietnamese effort had been devastated. For even-handed, gentle, analysis of a terrible subject, you could not do better than Kuralt and Campbell.


22 posted on 02/20/2014 5:09:08 PM PST by CJRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Vietnam War (The Politically Incorrect Guides) Paperback
by Phillip Jennings

This Time We Win: Revisiting the Tet Offensive
by James S Robbins

Lessons from the Vietnam War: Truths the Media Never Told You
by Leonard M (Mike) Scruggs

The Black Book of the American Left: The Collected Conservative Writings of David Horowitz

The Aggressors: Ho Chi Minh, North Vietnam, and the Communist Bloc
by Martin Scott Catino


Your child could learn something just by looking up these books on Amazon and reading the reviews. It’s a way to begin to travel deeper in to the question.

Another resource could be talking to vets who were there. Oral history and anecdotal evidence matter, too, as long as their limitations are understood.

I think the domestic USA response to the war (heavily influenced by Moscow) and the war itself have to be understood in terms of the global plans of communism. The tragedy of the 50’s, McCarthyism (McCarthy’s utter incompetence at handling the blowback from his efforts, as well as his failure to effectively manage his initiative in the first place), turned in to the travesty of the 60’s when people were weary and wary of the belief that communism was a threat.

Another excellent source for background atmosphere of the time, are the timeless papers written by Admiral Stockdale on Stoic philosophy and its value to him under brutal torture as a POW in the Hanoi Hilton. These essays are freely downloadable off the web (and already paid for with your tax dollars):

http://www.usna.edu/Ethics/_files/documents/stoicism1.pdf

http://www.usna.edu/Ethics/_files/documents/Stoicism2.pdf


23 posted on 02/20/2014 5:29:49 PM PST by speedbird57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: drypowder
No, I don't think you were there. I think you're a liar.

But for you to suggest we weren't there to protect our allies is just, well, you're an idiot. Please tell me you're just a troll from Dummies Underground. I knew we had fools in the Repugnant party. I just didn't know we had stupid fools.

Don't bother to respond. You're on my ignore list.

25 posted on 02/20/2014 6:27:30 PM PST by LouAvul (In a state of disbelief as to how liberals destroyed America in a mere 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Here is a collection of Gallup polling that might surprise people.

Your son should also know that Vietnam was overwhelmingly fought by volunteers, just as WWII was overwhelmingly fought by draftees.


26 posted on 02/20/2014 6:32:15 PM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Nixon: A Life
by Jonathan Aitken, MP

This may perhaps be a bit off-topic, but I found it quite interesting. The author is British, and was ordered by his boss (who was slated to meet Nixon) to write up a memo about who Nixon was and what he thought. This was after Nixon’s political defeats for the presidency in 1960, and his subsequent loss in his run for Governor of California, and Aitken just took his cue from the conventional wisdom, and wrote up a bunch of liberal cant. His boss set him straight, and to his credit Aitken took his cue and became very interested in Nixon. Subsequently he became a member of Parliament, and subsequently wrote this book.


27 posted on 02/20/2014 6:33:14 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
oops, I forgot the polls.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

28 posted on 02/20/2014 6:41:45 PM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

I didn’t say I was there, dumb ass. I said I served, that means in the US military.
Apparently you don’t have to try hard to at all to be an ass hole.


29 posted on 02/20/2014 7:37:40 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Vietnam: The Necessary War" - Michael Lind
"Why We Were in Vietnam" - Norman Podheretz
"An American Amnesia: How the U.S. Congress Forced the Surrender of South Vietnam and Cambodia" - Bruce Herschensohn
30 posted on 02/20/2014 10:04:31 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian; icwhatudo

Yes, do not forget Media bias, the fifth column:

Underlying the importance of such is the often quoted exchange between Colonel Harry G. Summers, Jr. and his North Vietnamese counterpart, Colonel Tu. During one of his liaison trips to Hanoi, Colonel Harry told Tu, “You know, you never beat us on the battlefield,” Colonel Tu responded, “That may be so, but it is also irrelevant.”[84]

The success of the propaganda war has seemed enigmatic to many. “If there is to be an inquiry related to the Vietnam War, it should be into the reasons why enemy propaganda was so widespread in this country, and why the enemy was able to condition the public to such an extent that the best educated segments of our population (that is, media and university elite) gave credence to the most incredible allegations.” (Final Report - Chief of Military History - U.S. Government)

CBS Evening News with Walter Cronkite regularly carried news reports from its Moscow Bureau Chief, Bernard Redmont. When peace negotiations commenced with North Vietnam in Paris, Redmont became CBS News Paris Bureau Chief. What Redmont never reported during the ten year conflict was, Redmont had been a KGB operative since the 1930s, and member of the notorious Silvermaster group.[87] Redmont was the only journalist to whom his fellow Comintern party member, and North Vietnamese chief negotiator, Mai Van Bo, granted an interview to bring the Communist point of view into American living rooms in what has been called, “the living room war.”

In addition to his biased reporting, FBI documents, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act by Yahoo news, evidence that legendary CBS News anchor Walter Cronkite collaborated with anti-Vietnam War activists in the 1960s, going so far as to offer advice on how to raise the public profile of protests and even promising that CBS News would rent a helicopter to take liberal Senator Edmund Muskie to and from the site of an anti-war rally.[88]

British “Encounter” journalist Robert Elegant stated,

For the first time in modern history, the outcome of a war was determined not on the battlefield but on the printed page and, above all, on the television screen. Looking back coolly, I believe it can be said (surprising as it may still sound) that South Vietnamese and American forces actually won the limited military struggle. They virtually crushed the Viet Cong in the South, the “native” guerrillas who were directed, reinforced, and equipped from Hanoi; and thereafter they threw back the invasion by regular North Vietnamese divisions. Nonetheless, the war was finally lost to the invaders after the U.S. disengagement because the political pressures built up by the media had made it quite impossible for Washington to maintain even the minimal material and moral support that would have enabled the Saigon regime to continue effective resistance....Never before Vietnam had the collective policy of the media sought by graphic and unremitting distortion, the victory of the enemies of the correspondents own side.

More: http://www.conservapedia.com/Vietnam_war#Media_Bias


31 posted on 02/21/2014 4:27:46 AM PST by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Interesting then that when early independence was declared for Vietnam, major sections of the American constitution were incorporated into theirs. But then, Truman let the French back in, and....
32 posted on 02/21/2014 6:16:57 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: drypowder
Sorry for my insults. Regardless my opinion I shouldn't have insulted you.

Hope you have a nice day.

33 posted on 02/21/2014 7:46:52 AM PST by LouAvul (In a state of disbelief as to how liberals destroyed America in a mere 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

“Interesting then that when early independence was declared for Vietnam, major sections of the American constitution were incorporated into theirs. “

Constitutions mean nothing under Communist rule which Ho Chi Minh understood perfectly well. It was nothing more than propaganda designed to fool gullible westerners.

North Vietnam was a one party totalitarian state- if as you assume he was wedded to the American constitution then you must explain why he put none of it into practice. He didn’t because he never intended to. The USSR’s constitution also sounded good.


34 posted on 02/21/2014 7:25:31 PM PST by Pelham (If you don’t deport it’s amnesty by default.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pelham; stylecouncilor

Two interesting takes on history. Oh, well. My good fortune came at the expense of others. Yet at least I was able to show the sorrow and the beauty of the place to my daughter thirty years later.


35 posted on 02/21/2014 8:26:42 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson