Posted on 02/26/2014 5:18:40 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
Paul Ryan is currently on CNBC.
Good interview.
Now one point:
Bring back American jobs.
Another pathological liar.
I agree. How can we trust a word this guy says? He has no credibility anymore.
Me, three, and I live in WI.
I agree with the message “Bring American jobs home. Start making stuff here again. America first. Down with this so-called “Free-trade” that only benefits foreign countries and our elite Quislings here.” However, I don’t like the messenger because he stabbed us in the back on many issues.
I agree Paul Ryan had an issue, and agree he needs to be looked at critically, I just wanted to say he sounded good on CNBC.
He looks good, and seems very much on the ball.
Don’t count him out. He seems to be thinking on his feet.
For example one of the CNBC anchors set him up, trying very hard to get him to come down on the side against Jan Brewer.
He was very good, and wouldn’t.
Just saying. I’m not advocating strongly for Ryan, but I just think we should keep him in the “active consideration” status is all.
I think he’s good on balance.
That’s all well and good. We need candidates that can express themselves clearly and sound informed when doing so. I don’t dispute that Ryan can sound that way often. However, I am disgusted with rino appeasers of illegal aliens. I am also not convinced that Ryan is that strong of a candidate either. Remember his debate performance with the clown Joe Biden? Biden’s immature antics went unanswered by Ryan suggesting Ryan can’t hang in any future debate. We don’t need candidates that can’t slug it out in the school yard either.
I'm not too keen on bringing in hordes of 3rd world socialists into the USA as this Amnesty will do. this Amnesty would be the destruction of a once free country the USA
I understand yours and others viewpoints.
IMHO, the major point of contention between us is the differing level of tolerance each of has for silently allowing elected Republicans to act as submissive doormats for violators of the US Constitution.
IOW, what level of tolerance does each of us have, when exceeded, will put the elected Republicans who do nothing to oppose violations of the US Constitution in the category of “Do Nothing RINOs?”
If you don’t like your Do Nothing RINO, then insist that he/she resign, PERIOD.
My level of “Do Nothing RINOs,” (DNR), tolerance was forever exceeded during the Primary Campaign of 2012.
I will not anymore vote for Do Nothing RINOs again.
I shall just leave their slots blank on the ballot, as there is no effective difference between a Do Nothing RINO and a Democrat.
At each time, during the past five years of critical voting, the Do Nothing RINOs in the House and Senate have voted with the Democrats to approve the violation of the US Constitution being voted on.
Their usual defeatist whine is: “We can’t do anything because we do not have control of the Senate or White House.”
The Do Nothing RINOs were given FIVE years to do something and did nothing.
Now it is our turn.
IOW, the Do Nothing RINOs and the Democrats vote together as a single, unshakable, voting block to rubber-stamp whatever Obama wants to do to “Fundamentally Change the United States of America.”
Well stated. Just because Ryan can be glib and can fend off a mediot’s ambush does not mean he represents my conservative principles. Keep jobs in America but let foreigners conduct a bloodless invasion?
Now, if a President Palin wanted to use Ryan as an advisor I would have no problem with that.
Nice message but until the government (dems and pubbies) stops making it incredibly difficult for business to be successful, we won’t be adding jobs.
Yeh jobs for all the illegals he wants to grant amnesty to. What a RINO tool!!
Are you serious? This is the second thread today that I find you defending this slug.
Recall his budget deal with the dumbest women in the US Senate? She cleaned his clock! Have you forgotten?
And what about his support for AMNESTY (and its resultant chain immigration)?
I know what that RINO stands for so the question becomes: What do you stand for?
For those who want “American manufacturing jobs” here’s an announcement from Tesla about their new Gigafactory just moments ago:
Tesla now +3.2% AH. Gigafactory aims to supply 500K vehicles. • 5:02 PM
Tesla (TSLA) has turned positive in AH trading after providing details (.pdf) about its gigafactory.
Tesla predicts the gigafactory will produce enough batteries to supply 500K vehicles by 2020, and that its output will exceed that of total 2013 global battery production. The company also expects the facility will drive down its per-kWH battery costs by over 30% within a year of volume production.
Facility construction is set for 2014-2015, equipment installation for 2016, and initial production for 2017. The gigafactory is expected to employ 6.5K workers, and require up to 10M sq. feet of space.
Previous: Tesla announces $1.6B convertible debt offering
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.