Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Veterans Ask Supreme Court to Intervene, Save Mt. Soledad Cross
NBC San Diego ^ | Tuesday, Mar 4, 2014 | R. Stickney

Posted on 03/04/2014 4:34:59 PM PST by nickcarraway

The Mt. Soledad Memorial Association has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to step in and "bring an end" to a decades-long legal dispute in San Diego. “Only this Court can bring an end to this litigation,” the group writes in its petition to have the case heard by the justices.

At issue is a 43-foot- tall cross that has been on a hillside looking over La Jolla and Mission Bay since 1954.

In December, a federal judge ordered the cross must come down because it violates the Establishment Cause of the Constitution, unlawfully endorsing one religion over others.

In their petition, the veterans group asks Supreme Court justices to step in and review the decision, explaining that there are hundreds of plaques honoring veterans of all religions surrounding the base of the cross.

“The context and history of the Memorial make clear that its primary purpose and effect is not to endorse religion, but to honor veterans,” the petition states.

In 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the cross violated the First Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case, and it was sent back to federal court in San Diego, where the December ruling was issued. Veterans warned justices that by refusing to hear the case, they could be putting other war memorials in the same legal quandary.

“As long as the Ninth Circuit’s decision stands, it puts into question the legality of hundreds, if not thousands, of veterans’ memorials across the country,” the petition states.

If the Supreme Court does not review the case, it lets the lower court's ruling stand. The order states the cross must be moved within 90 days.


TOPICS: Local News; Military/Veterans; Religion
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/04/2014 4:34:59 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Who owns the cross? Who paid for it’s installation?


2 posted on 03/04/2014 4:38:26 PM PST by Tenacious 1 (My whimsical litany of satyric prose and avarice pontification of wisdom demonstrates my concinnity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

If the atheists wanted the cross down they should have filed suit when the cross was erected, not decades later.

It is now a part of the landscape so leave it and all the other crosses that cause such hurt to the libs.


3 posted on 03/04/2014 5:07:02 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
In December, a federal judge ordered the cross must come down because it violates the Establishment Cause of the Constitution, unlawfully endorsing one religion over others.

By what authority? The 1st Amendment refers only to actions by "Congress" (shall make no law), not the states. ith the 10th Amendment, this would appear to negate any Federal authority over religious matters in the states.

4 posted on 03/04/2014 5:35:15 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
In the fwiw department, Jesus said this would happen.

5.56mm

5 posted on 03/04/2014 5:36:55 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson