Skip to comments.'We can't prove sex with children does them harm' says Labour-linked NCCL
Posted on 03/04/2014 7:16:32 PM PST by massmike
EVIDENCE has emerged that the views of the Paedophile Information Exchange influenced policy-making at the National Council for Civil Liberties when it was run by former Labour Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt.
PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for paedophile love.
Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.
Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.
It says: Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.
Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.
The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child victims which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been molested.
The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.
The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.
(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...
As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.
I have no response to that, jaw dropped
From “It can never happen” to “What can it possibly hurt?”..
I’m only surprised at the SPEED of it all.....
Otherwise,these people and their twisted agenda are ridiculously predictable:
No child engages in sexual experiences with an adult voluntarily, not in their nature. And down the rabbit hole we go ... Obviously these people have never talked to anyone that was molested as a child.
These people are ALREADY here. They run GLAAD.
If you look at old National Libertarian Party platforms you will find the same thing.
These demented ilk skipped a page. I thought the next page, was polygamy, not pedophilia. What is going on here.
Maybe they plan to kill two birds with one stone and marry multiple children?
If anyone doubts we are living in the last days.
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness but denying the power thereof: from such turn away (II Tim. 3:1-6).
The UK is finished.
The American Psychology Association (APA) made the same claim five or so years ago. It actually claimed that it was beneficial for children. They later recanted...probably reluctantly.
They also run the debt of education
I suppose the pervs are suggesting that more testing is in order??
Liberals are sexually active, they think about sex 24/7! Defeat Liberalism!!!
The Supreme Court may already have 4 sure votes for all this
Yes we can.
I have a response. I can conclude that they may not be sure sex with children causes them harm, but I guarantee it will cause the perpetrators immense harm.
This will not be tolerated on any level by any decent person.
Just for the record:
Attempting to have sex with any child WILL be hazardous to their health!
This is crazy.
Kill these people. Now.
Before the mods remove this, I am only quoting Jesus, our Lord, who said,
“Whosoever shall cause harm to come to one of these little ones, it were better that a great millstone be hung around his neck, and he be drowned in the depths of the sea.”
And the University of Minnestoopid published the same as well.
My guess is there just aren’t as many polygamists as there are pedophiles in jolly England, so they are going by public demand.
They won’t remove advocation for the death penalty for pedophiles. I 100% agree. HANG ‘EM!
Do you doubt the words and act of the Prophet, Infidel Dogs!
The Great Pedophile married a nine year old and you dare question the wisdom Allah revealed to MadMo!
To even question the sanctity of child marriage is to Insult Islam ! ! !
Have you no respect for Islam?
My sarcasm well just ran dry.
A very short step to human sacrifice. And from there, cannibalism.
Here’s what happened to a woman you took extreme measures to straighten out her homosexual son.
How long has it been since even secular psychology was oy-veying over what happens when your mother hates you, and then we have this?
Weird story about the heir of the Bakelite fortune.
It’s a challenge today.
We can’t depend on much help from “world” any more to stand up for “good morals.”
Christians of older times would have taken this pretty much for granted. I think America got spoiled. Just because it had a fortuitous start in the gospel (the New World was a popular refuge for Christian denominations that had seen mistreatment in the Old World) didn’t mean that the gospel fire was going to live on untended.
The ideal situation is where Christian “straightdar” comes looking for “gays” to save.
or married one of them ...
Indeed, sir. Even the American Psychiatric Association has toyed with the notion in the last few years. What a country. If a kid manages to avoid being aborted, you they have to avoid the gauntlet of perverts trying to do harm to them.
I agree, but that won’t happen until the present (dis)order implodes and we need to build a new society upon the wreckage.
Why do you think our elites (here and in Europe) simply adore Islam?
Soon they'll be pretending that they never opposed the new "civil rights movement" of child rape.
This article reminds me of the surreal conversations that took place at the last B4U-ACT (pedophile-friendly psych group) conference, attended by Matt Barber as a conservative reported. If you have the stomach for it, look it up. But before a meal, preferably.
That most perfect of all men, mohammad, married a 6 year old...
When dealing with things divine, I never say never to anything good (unless the bible unambiguously rules it out).
I think modern Christiandom suffers from a lack of good imagination concerning the gospel. I look at the way the world goes on, how various things become passions and rages and fads, seemingly with little rhyme or reason. But nobody tries marketing the gospel that way because of the fear someone will call it blasphemous.
How much further the existing world must fail before Christendom is willing to do this, is something only God knows. But I don’t presume to tell God that He can’t do something that otherwise makes biblical sense. And there is a biblical suggestion that volunteers to the harvest will do a positive good.
Christiandom => Christendom [typo]
How perfectly DISGUSTING this whole idea is! Yet NAMBLA and some lesbian groups agree with it, because they want to have sex with anyone of their choosing, with no restrictions!
Really? My gosh, I think someone is going to ask for human-plant sex soon...
“In a landmark decision, a Federal judge ruled that a California woman can marry her fichus tree...”
By coming up with the first thermosetting plastic, old man Baekeland just about produced a turning point in civilization. Then there was his offspring. It’s almost as if they were trying to cancel out the the Bakelite part of his legacy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.