Skip to comments.'We can't prove sex with children does them harm' says Labour-linked NCCL
Posted on 03/04/2014 7:16:32 PM PST by massmike
EVIDENCE has emerged that the views of the Paedophile Information Exchange influenced policy-making at the National Council for Civil Liberties when it was run by former Labour Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt.
PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for paedophile love.
Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.
Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.
It says: Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.
Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.
The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child victims which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been molested.
The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.
The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.
(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...
As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.
I have no response to that, jaw dropped
From “It can never happen” to “What can it possibly hurt?”..
I’m only surprised at the SPEED of it all.....
Otherwise,these people and their twisted agenda are ridiculously predictable:
No child engages in sexual experiences with an adult voluntarily, not in their nature. And down the rabbit hole we go ... Obviously these people have never talked to anyone that was molested as a child.
These people are ALREADY here. They run GLAAD.
If you look at old National Libertarian Party platforms you will find the same thing.
These demented ilk skipped a page. I thought the next page, was polygamy, not pedophilia. What is going on here.
Maybe they plan to kill two birds with one stone and marry multiple children?
If anyone doubts we are living in the last days.
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness but denying the power thereof: from such turn away (II Tim. 3:1-6).
The UK is finished.
The American Psychology Association (APA) made the same claim five or so years ago. It actually claimed that it was beneficial for children. They later recanted...probably reluctantly.
They also run the debt of education
I suppose the pervs are suggesting that more testing is in order??
Liberals are sexually active, they think about sex 24/7! Defeat Liberalism!!!
The Supreme Court may already have 4 sure votes for all this