Posted on 03/04/2014 7:16:32 PM PST by massmike
EVIDENCE has emerged that the views of the Paedophile Information Exchange influenced policy-making at the National Council for Civil Liberties when it was run by former Labour Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt.
PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “paedophile love”.
Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.
Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.
It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.
“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.
“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.
“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.
“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”
(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...
Soon they'll be pretending that they never opposed the new "civil rights movement" of child rape.
This article reminds me of the surreal conversations that took place at the last B4U-ACT (pedophile-friendly psych group) conference, attended by Matt Barber as a conservative reported. If you have the stomach for it, look it up. But before a meal, preferably.
That most perfect of all men, mohammad, married a 6 year old...
When dealing with things divine, I never say never to anything good (unless the bible unambiguously rules it out).
I think modern Christiandom suffers from a lack of good imagination concerning the gospel. I look at the way the world goes on, how various things become passions and rages and fads, seemingly with little rhyme or reason. But nobody tries marketing the gospel that way because of the fear someone will call it blasphemous.
How much further the existing world must fail before Christendom is willing to do this, is something only God knows. But I don’t presume to tell God that He can’t do something that otherwise makes biblical sense. And there is a biblical suggestion that volunteers to the harvest will do a positive good.
Christiandom => Christendom [typo]
How perfectly DISGUSTING this whole idea is! Yet NAMBLA and some lesbian groups agree with it, because they want to have sex with anyone of their choosing, with no restrictions!
Really? My gosh, I think someone is going to ask for human-plant sex soon...
“In a landmark decision, a Federal judge ruled that a California woman can marry her fichus tree...”
By coming up with the first thermosetting plastic, old man Baekeland just about produced a turning point in civilization. Then there was his offspring. It’s almost as if they were trying to cancel out the the Bakelite part of his legacy.
Absolutely!!
They got baked but good.
Another similar irony is how the Browning heirs (of Browning rifle fame) included several tragic cases of insanity.
“Bore from within” works for activists only insofar as there is a government body to bore into. Our own activists are doing their very best to coalesce this sort of power into our own government, and they’re gaining. It isn’t “for the children”.
“Darling, theyre’ll never be another ewe.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.