Posted on 03/07/2014 11:36:47 AM PST by Daffynition
[snip] .... In 2006, we did a systematic review and identified five industrial chemicals as developmental neurotoxicants: lead, methylmercury, polychlorinated biphenyls, arsenic, and toluene. Since 2006, epidemiological studies have documented six additional developmental neurotoxicantsmanganese, fluoride, chlorpyrifos, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene, and the polybrominated diphenyl ethers. We postulate that even more neurotoxicants remain undiscovered. To control the pandemic of developmental neurotoxicity, we propose a global prevention strategy.
(Excerpt) Read more at thelancet.com ...
So! That will probably be removed from toothpaste and all our teeth will rot before we are sixty.
My children have never had fluoridated water or fluoridated toothpaste. They’ve had a sum total of one cavity between them.
K2/D3 and appropriate minerals are involved in tooth formation and maintenance.
The city where I live does not have fluoride put in the water and I’m doing fine.
Don’t use it in my toothpaste either. As I recall it’s really a poison.
LOL....someone already said they’d rather go to a psychiatrist for autism....than a dentist.
So... they discover now that DDT is toxic? Not surprised.
Every thing is a poison at the right dose. However many things have very useful applications at less than toxic doses.
It's too bad more people today aren't as smart as one guy was 500 years ago.
Brush with H2O2.
What’s amazing is that last year, liberal Portland Oregon voted down a proposal to fluoridate their water. Good!
If I had a penny for every toxin I’d been exposed to I’d be a billionaire.
Hormesis.
Journolisters with the MSM have had several months to publish on this research.
One wonders why they haven’t.
One wonders why you need to link this particular research and its validity to a political organization?
Do you sell fluoride compounds for a living or something?
OOps, meant to post this to you:
One wonders why you need to link this particular research and its validity to a political organization?
Do you sell fluoride compounds for a living or something?
I’m curious why the outlet that publishes the Lancet article matters.
“Do you sell fluoride compounds for a living or something?”
Nah, I just find conspiracy theories fascinating. The JBS wrote the book on them.
So what’s the connection between Fluoride and European Jewish Bankers?
“Nah, I just find conspiracy theories fascinating. The JBS wrote the book on them.”
Now the Lancet is a conspiracy theory publication?
I read the article in question in the Lancet. Perhaps you can point to the bit in that publication that concerns European Jewish Bankers? I seem to have missed that.
Apparently there are a lot of conspiracy theories at PubMed!
Who knew!?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22138353
Developmental thyroid hormone disruption: prevalence, environmental contaminants and neurodevelopmental consequences.
etc.
Many more like this at pubmed.
I’m waiting for your insider information that The Lancet is a conspiracy theory publication.
Do tell!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.