Skip to comments.
Was Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 hacked?
WTOP.com ^
| 3/14/2014, 1:53pm
| J.J. Green
Posted on 03/16/2014 10:39:33 PM PDT by RC one
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: RC one
41
posted on
03/17/2014 7:14:13 AM PDT
by
ncfool
(Taking back America 2016.)
To: Mark17
Mark17, thank you for your service.
We still use HF over water. For example, I can go any where in the Caribbean on VHF, but I have to us HF to Bermuda.
To: pieceofthepuzzle
I had a thought similar to yours. What if someone or some country needed to learn the technology included in that plane? If they'd been studying its potential, they might've been to the point where they could hack its systems.
And I for one am going to applaud wild speculation. This whole situation is way out of the ordinary, and using it as an opportunity to explore what is and is not possible is healthy brainstorming.
43
posted on
03/17/2014 8:52:53 AM PDT
by
grania
To: CFIIIMEIATP737
Read the link in post#41.. I think he may be on to something.
We used the technique in the Navy. I have snuck up on more then one commercial airliner that way
44
posted on
03/17/2014 9:19:04 AM PDT
by
Robe
(Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
To: RC one
Here's an interesting theory, claiming that the flight could have flown in the shadow of another 777 and made it to central asia undetected.
Did Malaysian Airlines 370 disappear using SIA68/SQ68 (another 777)?
This one is worthy of a James Bond movie. I don't subscribe to any specific theory, by the way, just enjoying reading them and waiting to find out which one was closest to the truth. It's a great world-wide mystery. I just wish we could find out already.
45
posted on
03/17/2014 9:39:58 AM PDT
by
Defiant
(Let the Tea Party win, and we will declare peace on the American people and go home.)
To: ncfool
Oh man, you beat me to it!
46
posted on
03/17/2014 10:11:07 AM PDT
by
Defiant
(Let the Tea Party win, and we will declare peace on the American people and go home.)
To: fiftymegaton
So when the media reports that the pilots last communication was with Air Traffic Control, it may not have been with the nearest airports tower(likely was not), but may have been with the nearest Enroute Facility or TRACON facility. Or however they might name such similar facilities in that part of the world.Affirmative sir. When I was in Travis AFB Tower, we simulcasted on both VHF/UHF frequencies for ground control and tower control. You can google the frequencies. They have not changed since I retired in 1987.
47
posted on
03/17/2014 5:36:15 PM PDT
by
Mark17
(Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Vet 70-71 Msgt US Air Force, retired)
To: Resolute Conservative
manually fly a plane anymore? How one could get good at that is with endless hours of simulator time.
HF
48
posted on
03/18/2014 6:14:38 AM PDT
by
holden
To: holden
So by that logic I should be able to play pro football since I have an xBox.
To: Resolute Conservative
I'm a flight instructor, have been trained on most commercial 6DOF sims, sat on the FAA committee to certify sims, and seen many a good virtual pilot, who acquired his skill on something similar to Shah's home brew sim. I've also checked out and biennialed big rig pilots that had lost a lot of their manual flying skills.
I've not seen it done on an X-Box, but oh, yeah, that was your inexperienced, extrapolated non sequitur.
HF
50
posted on
03/18/2014 6:45:27 AM PDT
by
holden
To: Defiant; ncfool
Choosing another 777 to shadow seems like another layer of precision and care, but what is it the pilot would have found desirable or necessary to hide in doing so?
HF
51
posted on
03/18/2014 7:04:24 AM PDT
by
holden
To: holden
I would not say that I am inexperienced. While I am not big rig qualified, my dad has over 20,000 hours in 727, 747, MD80, and other types and he says sims only go so far and without being in one of the contained “ultra” sim platforms you develop no feel for the aircraft. You aren’t getting the “feel” sitting in a chair at a table. Sims are good for teaching/reviewing procedure and exposing airfield particulars etc... but a long way from flying a plane weighing 600,000 pounds with 45,000 gallons of fuel and cargo.
So your non-sequitur is non-sequitur.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson