Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired 777 Pilot Calls the Show (Rush Limbaugh)
RushLimbaugh.com ^ | 3-18-2014 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 03/18/2014 12:18:38 PM PDT by servo1969

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-182 next last
To: Jewbacca

Seems like a lot of effort is being launched to convince folks of the on board fire theory. Yet with a sighting over the Maldives and Boeing blurting out its ascertained the jet has landed in Pakistan, and so now we have to prep a Seal Team 6 incursion but with resources to safely remove more than 200 passengers.


61 posted on 03/18/2014 1:35:18 PM PDT by Spartan302
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
But if the captain is basing his comments on data taken from primary radar returns only then it’s extremely flimsy

The captain is merely making a professional judgment call based on his experiences, there is no assertion whatsoever...........

And FWIW, his assessment certainly makes more sense that the rest of the 24/7 crap that is being fed to us by the MSM.......

BUT, maybe we can figure out a way to discredit him too...........

62 posted on 03/18/2014 1:37:31 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Was Occam's razor made by Gillette?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: holden
Veto authority: Stewie on phone: C'm-o-on.... lemme i-i-n-n! Co-pilot: "Sorry, Charlie!" (j/k) HF

In this case you just have to know the password, "alluha akbar"

63 posted on 03/18/2014 1:38:44 PM PDT by zipper ("The Second Amendment IS my carry permit!" -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
What's that saying about loose lips?

They're still sealed...........unless YOU figured out the code

64 posted on 03/18/2014 1:39:50 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Was Occam's razor made by Gillette?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Read the interview of the Boeing 777 pilot who obviously knows how that plane works. You’ll see what he says about the wild-eyed idea that the plane went up to that altitude to asphyxiate the passengers ... :-) ...


65 posted on 03/18/2014 1:39:55 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Spartan302
Boeing blurting out its ascertained the jet has landed in Pakistan

Hello NAPA, this is Al "the wrench" Queda calling from Islamabad. You got a couple oil filters and a set a brake pads for a triple 7-200?

66 posted on 03/18/2014 1:41:09 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GBA

“If your airplane had an inflight fire at altitude, would you want oxygen deployed?”

If I make delete your term ‘deployed’ and replace it with ‘don’, then the answer is yes.

Every jet I’ve flown says that for a cockpit or cabin fire, the first thing you do is put on smoke goggles and don the oxygen mask.


67 posted on 03/18/2014 1:41:19 PM PDT by CFIIIMEIATP737
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Spartan302

As I’ve read here, I agree with the theory that the plane was hijacked, probably by the pilot, and probably with the intent to fly back to Malaysia and crash into something governmental.

I strongly suspect, in the process of turning around and hiding his course, the Chinese shot the plane down because it flew over something sensitive.

The Chinese freaked about shooting down an airliner and, now that the situation has gone on so long, will never say a word.


68 posted on 03/18/2014 1:41:47 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Wonder if anyone has looked here ? Maybe the Sultan decided that he needed a new toy for his collection. If you needed to make a plane disappear, it helps to have a rich absolute monarchy where no one would question a plane showing up in the middle of the night with minimal navigation lighting and radio silence.
69 posted on 03/18/2014 1:42:41 PM PDT by anymouse (God didn't write this sitcom we call life, he's just the critic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Yeah, ever since 9/11, giant planes filled with people just vaporize in crashes.

I blame global warming.


70 posted on 03/18/2014 1:43:22 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca
the Chinese shot the plane down because it flew over something sensitive.

So far as we know, the plane never came within 500 miles of China.

71 posted on 03/18/2014 1:43:48 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media -- IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Some primary radar provide altitude, either by using a pencil beam (like a fire control radar) or surveillance radar with stacked beams. They transmit a big honking fat fan beam like a conventional surveillance radar and receive on a bunch of beams stacked in elevation. You can use the power ratio of the signal in adjacent beams to estimate elevation angle, and thence calculate height.

The png won’t embed, but look a figure 3 in this presentation:

http://www.radartutorial.eu/06.antennas/an12.en.html

As a practical matter, if the target is low to the horizon, even with a pencil beam, the scatter off the surface adds to the direct return in an unpredictable fashion, making elevation measurements unreliable. From about one beamwidth in elevation up, it’s pretty reliable.


72 posted on 03/18/2014 1:43:49 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (In the long run, we are all dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca
Thanks for your experienced opinion. I've thought that was the intent and reasoning behind an "automatic" deployment, which certainly makes logical sense, but am not sure if that is how it's done on all aircraft nor if there's not an override of some sort on the B777.

I'm more inclined to believe that allah got another one, same as the other ones.

73 posted on 03/18/2014 1:43:54 PM PDT by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: don-o
I still don't buy it.

Of course not, thus the purpose of the Captain's aired interview.........LOL!

BTW, Occam's razor was made by Gillette.........

74 posted on 03/18/2014 1:45:04 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Was Occam's razor made by Gillette?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I heard on coast to coast that the plane found a new Bermuda Triangle. I think it hit the Indian Ocean.


75 posted on 03/18/2014 1:50:20 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (2014: The Year of DEAD RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFIIIMEIATP737
For the flight crew, of course, but for everyone else? Especially if that system could be the one causing problems?

I personally don't know, just am asking questions.

I don't know how things are separated and isolated on that a/c.

Otoh, a fight, leading to a zoom climb to FL450 and then to a stall and fall to recovery is certainly possible, if that reported flight data is true.

It's all just speculation.

76 posted on 03/18/2014 1:51:10 PM PDT by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
Being that Ockham was a Briton, I figured it was from Sheffield, LOL.
77 posted on 03/18/2014 1:51:32 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: don-o

***At 500 knots the surface of the ocean will play the part of the wall quite nicely.

I still don’t buy it. ***

!00% true. I saw the remains of a Navy fighter that hit the water at 400+ knots. With the exception of several slightly larger pieces, there wasn’t a piece that wouldn’t easily fit in a lunch box, most would fit in a cellphone case.

This was a fighter, built much tougher than an airliner.

A vertical dive from altitude into water will shatter the aircraft into tiny pieces, including everything inside.


78 posted on 03/18/2014 1:51:45 PM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wrench

What would happen to the black box in a crash like that???


79 posted on 03/18/2014 1:55:08 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Aria
We’re in the aviation business and my husband knows a United Airlines chief pilot who found himself next to a muslim co-pilot who was in the cockpit complaining about the US government. The chief pilot refused to leave his seat - not even to go to the bathroom.... What the hell is United doing hiring such people????

It's called "promoting diversity", kinda like people voting for a president because he's black (or half-black).

80 posted on 03/18/2014 1:55:25 PM PDT by zipper ("The Second Amendment IS my carry permit!" -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson