Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
This idea is only as good as the database.

FWIW.....many people are *transient*....meaning they move from place to place. And I'm sure that the *last* thing they think about is to change their info in the database.

Also, I don't see people complying with the mandate, any more than they do with registering/tagging their dogs, in the first place.


11 posted on 03/22/2014 2:44:31 PM PDT by Daffynition ("If you think you can do a thing or think you can't do a thing, you're right." ~ Henry Ford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Daffynition

And that is exactly why the vet who chips the dog includes his clinic number.

No matter where the owner roams, the vet remains and if he retires, another vet gets the info.

I have my dogs’ chips registered with the national database and the AKC.

No matter what, they are shown to be owned by me and at least one of the contact numbers I provided is bound to still be alive and reachable.


16 posted on 03/22/2014 5:01:26 PM PDT by Salamander (SNEK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson