Replies

Just amazing....

You seem to be able to read all sorts of things into what I said, instead of reading what I actually said.

I have not advanced statism in any sort.

I have not offered an opinion except take the money, and run.

Stating the obvious, that it appears that this woman is the last of her neighbors to sell her property to this developer. The neighborhood as she knew it is going to change, whether she wants it to or not.

I stated the obvious that the project is going forward with or without her.

I didn’t say that the state should move on eminent domain, I said that they probably will.

I discussed two houses I am familiar with where the owners refused to sell to the company who had purchased all of the neighboring properties and went ahead with their project without/around them and they ended up with nothing but a house in the middle of a chemical plant.

The opinion I offered was that when presented with a choice of 6X the value or taking zero, that 6x was the way to go.

You should pay closer attention instead of muttering alone in the dark about advancing statism.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Continue to promote your Statist philosophy and liberalese rantings....these antiquated documents should be revised to reflect the changing times, anyway......ROFLOL............. that'll get you and Mrs. Bell "40 acres and a mule". To laugh.