Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDA has continuously warned against condom use for anal sex - itís time to sue Planned Parenthood
Life Site News ^ | by Rita Diller

Posted on 03/24/2014 6:45:01 AM PDT by Morgana

March 20, 2014 (STOPP.org) - Planned Parenthood pushes condoms continuously. Use condoms for anal sex to prevent disease transmission, it says. The condom mantra is at the heart of all the “comprehensive sex ed” programs. Yet, Representative Bob McDermott, who is tenaciously fighting the Planned Parenthood-promoted Pono Choices sex program aimed at middle school children in Hawaii, pointed out as early as February 3 that the FDA has warned about the dangers of using condoms for anal sex and that Pono Choices fails to pass those warnings on to students. In fact, the FDA says on its website that anal sex is so dangerous that it should not be engaged in, period!

Quoting from the FDA website:

Are condoms strong enough for anal intercourse?

The Surgeon General (C. Everett Koop, Surgeon General 1982-1989) has said, “Condoms provide some protection, but anal intercourse is simply too dangerous to practice.”

Condoms may be more likely to break during anal intercourse than during other types of sex because of the greater amount of friction and other stresses involved.

Even if the condom doesn’t break, anal intercourse is very risky because it can cause tissue in the rectum to tear and bleed. These tears allow disease germs to pass more easily from one partner to the other.

Representative McDermott has repeatedly warned that the Pono Choices curriculum puts educators at risk of legal consequences because it presents students with scenarios that are dangerous and/or illegal, and those dangers and legalities are not explained to the students. He says in his 18-page report on Pono Choices: “If parents knew what was in it, and how it was presented, they would not walk away—they would run away. This material should be pulled from the schools now. Continued use of this curriculum could put the school system in legal peril, as students may detrimentally rely on the information contained therein.”

Yet, rather than pulling the comprehensive sex curricula in schools across the nation—or even getting down to important medical and legal details with elementary and middle school children targeted by these egregious sex programs—young students are often taught how to increase sexual pleasure while putting on a condom and how to engage in sex “play” to make sex with a condom more pleasurable. Important medical facts are routinely withheld from students as Planned Parenthood and its cohorts pursue an agenda of “sex positive” instruction.

Dr. Judith Reisman, a former principal investigator for the US Department of Justice, writing this week for WorldNetDaily, issued a call for “a class action lawsuit by AIDS victims and their loved ones . . . —a suit based on the fact that condom pushers have for years dispensed false, deceptive claims about how the product protects—or fails to protect—the health of sex participants. The reality is that everyday condoms are manufactured and approved for natural, vaginal sex, not anal ‘sex’—they are not effectively designed to protect from disease those people who engage in sodomy,” Dr. Reisman says.

She said such a lawsuit would “rock the world.”

She suggested appropriate targets for the lawsuit would include Planned Parenthood, the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, and “a myriad of teachers and school systems . . . that have taught that anal sex . . . is not so different than natural coitus.”

Dr. Reisman is right. Parents should start threatening school officials and Planned Parenthood with lawsuits over the blatant disregard for the health and well-being of the students they are charged with, and carrying through when they fail to respond to their demands to stop exploiting children. Encouraging all sorts of intercourse, and painting it as a safe and desirable thing to do while intentionally withholding information about the dangers of such behavior is despicable. The perpetrators need to be brought into court and required to pay for their misdeeds.

Successful class action lawsuits result in the payment of triple the amount of damages to successful plaintiffs. It is time to stop Planned Parenthood’s exploitation of children, and lawsuits are an option that should be embraced.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: analsex; ceverettkoop; condom; condoms; fda; hawaii; homosexualagenda; judithreisman; plannedparenthood; prolife

1 posted on 03/24/2014 6:45:01 AM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Interesting.


2 posted on 03/24/2014 6:49:34 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The pedophiles will be very very angry if such a class action suit goes forward.


3 posted on 03/24/2014 6:51:44 AM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

That’s not what butts are for.


4 posted on 03/24/2014 6:53:45 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug; narses; little jeremiah; GeronL; Chode; NYer; Salvation

What is “interesting” about it is C. Everett Koop was telling us this way back in the 1980’s when this AIDS crap began!! I remember his speech. The C. Everett gave his speech without an agenda he just said it like it was. “Condoms provide some protection, but anal intercourse is simply too dangerous to practice.” How simple is that? The man was a doctor after all, the nation’s top doctor, I would think he knew.


5 posted on 03/24/2014 6:54:37 AM PDT by Morgana (Wagglebee please come home we miss you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Hard to beat anal sex for ‘interesting.’


6 posted on 03/24/2014 6:57:49 AM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Porno Choices?

What is that?


7 posted on 03/24/2014 7:00:06 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; All

“...but anal intercourse is simply too dangerous to practice.”

Hum...I don’t stick my silverware in the garbage disposal much for the same reason...


8 posted on 03/24/2014 7:07:19 AM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

> the FDA says on its website that anal sex is so dangerous that it should not be engaged in, period! ... Condoms may be more likely to break during anal intercourse than during other types of sex because of the greater amount of friction and other stresses involved. Even if the condom doesn’t break, anal intercourse is very risky because it can cause tissue in the rectum to tear and bleed.

Gosh, and we can’t afford to lose any homosexuals... /s


9 posted on 03/24/2014 7:16:10 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

“Gay” sex; it’s not just abnormal; it’s dangerous.


10 posted on 03/24/2014 7:19:02 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot

When will the Southern Poverty Law Center label the FDA a Hate Group?


11 posted on 03/24/2014 7:24:29 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
All that's going to happen is that the FDA will get a blue ribbon committee of "crack scientists" together and decide, oh wait, condoms are OK for anal sex.

But they will also have to add that global climate change has made all sex more dangerous.

12 posted on 03/24/2014 7:40:58 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Second, and a more precise question is, can HIV pass through latex condoms?...

Internet literature from AIDS information sites - that do not seem to have an "anti-condom" agenda - seem to agree that the “pores” in latex condoms are approximately .5 microns in size, whereas the HIV virus size is .1 microns. See this Arizona health site for corroboration.

13 posted on 03/24/2014 8:12:24 AM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Oh this is soooo not politically correct. (rolleyes)

Even though its right and true and that activity is very unsafe, a lawsuit is going to offend a someone so it has to be tossed.


14 posted on 03/24/2014 8:15:08 AM PDT by envisio (Its on like Donkey Kong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
"Even if the condom doesn’t break, anal intercourse is very risky because it can cause tissue in the rectum to tear and bleed. These tears allow disease germs to pass more easily from one partner to the other."

These tears also allow disease germs to pass into the blood stream from a person's OWN fecal material, which is composed of many waste products, but also is 40-60% bacteria. Most of that bacteria is e-coli, which is a necessary resident of our gut, without which we couldn't absorb some nutrients. But many other pathogens exist there without causing us trouble As Long As They Stay Put in our colons, and don't find their way into our blood streams. In our blood, they are potentially deadly, including the e-coli which is *always* present.

15 posted on 03/24/2014 8:18:42 AM PDT by MWFsFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I’d guess that there are just too many condom blowouts and it’s indicative of a quality control problem at the Chinese Condom Co.

Which brings us to the Scot who wanted the pharmacist to fix his condom. The pharmacist said it would be cheaper to replace the condom for $0.50 than to vulcanize a patch onto it.

The Scot said it sounded like a good deal, but he had to leave for a meeting and assured the pharmacist he’d be back. An hour and a half later the Scot returned and said to the pharmacist: “Aye, lad, I’ll spend the $0.50 and buy a new condom. The regiment voted its approval for the expenditure.”


16 posted on 03/24/2014 8:22:27 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Butt, telling folks that anal sex is so dangerous would be discriminatory towards queers.


17 posted on 03/24/2014 9:23:27 AM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Vote Democrat. Once you're OK with killing babies the rest is easy. <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The World Health Organization recognized that condoms don’t prevent viral transmissions over 15 years ago.


18 posted on 03/24/2014 9:41:50 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

God a mighty why not just warn agains’t anal sex. :-)


19 posted on 03/24/2014 9:57:43 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The laws against sodomy were enacted because all of its dangers, both biologically, culturally and sociologically were known through the wisdom of thousands of years of human civilization. It’s funny that today the only evidence that is deemed worthy is that from scientists and pseudo-scientists. Hello! The anus is an exit not an entrance!


20 posted on 03/24/2014 10:59:14 AM PDT by MikeyB806
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Planned Parenthood pushes condoms continuously. Use condoms for anal sex to prevent disease transmission, it says.

PP considers unwanted pregnancy (whether it is wrong sex, too many fetuses, or wrong baby daddy) to be a disease that can kill your good times.

PP's advice that two men using condoms for anal sex is guaranteed not to result in an unwanted pregnancy.

PS, Planned Parenthood has a sex positive education offshoot called SIECUS that has as a goal seeing everyone sexually active at every age.

Condoms in schools was not about safer sex and ending unwanted pregnancies, it was about forever ending the argument of IF children should be having sex, shifting the focus to WHEN...

21 posted on 03/24/2014 4:05:05 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Reading this is helping with the diet. Was hungry before reading, now not.


22 posted on 03/24/2014 4:08:43 PM PDT by TruthWillWin (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson