Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexican President Angry at U.S. Deportations of Illegal Aliens
Top Right News ^ | 03-31-2014 | John Urban

Posted on 03/31/2014 6:09:20 PM PDT by montag813

nieto

Above: El Presidente is shocked -- shocked -- that the U.S.
doesn't want his poorest and most criminally-minded citizens.

by John Urban | Top Right News

Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto said he is "indignant" at the United States' deportation of Mexican migrants and described U.S. lawmakers as demonstrating a "lack of conscience" in failing to pass immigration reform.

Translation? Mexico's head Conquistador is sore that the peasants they have worked so hard to export to the chumps in El Norte are being sent back to them.

There I said it.

Mexico does everything it can to rid itself of its poorest and brownest citizens and use Los Estados Unidos as its outsourced welfare state; helps them grab every social service benefit they can get while they're here; demand they be handed U.S. citizenship; sue if there is any "discrimination" (i.e. law enforcement) against them; and howls like mad if a single one is deported.

(Excerpt) Read more at toprightnews.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society; Travel
KEYWORDS: aliens; border; cultureofcorruption; doublestandard; hypocrite; immigration; mexico; sendbackthem

1 posted on 03/31/2014 6:09:20 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: montag813

Tough tacos.


2 posted on 03/31/2014 6:10:22 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
How is Mexico's southern border doing? Wide open? Lot's of folks from Central America streaming across, looking for good jobs in Mexico?

Didn't think so. They lock it pretty tight. No tolerance for interlopers.

3 posted on 03/31/2014 6:11:48 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

El Con-Man doesn’t want the patsies (that’s us) to screw up the invasion game by actually enforcing our laws.

He and his crooked buddies have far more power over us then they ever did in the last 5 centuries and they can’t believe their good luck in that.


4 posted on 03/31/2014 6:12:19 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

That’s because he’s Spanish and wants to rid the country of mexicans!!


5 posted on 03/31/2014 6:13:16 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Next he will be claiming right under the Putin doctrine to move across the border to protect Mexican citizens. Most likely target is Southern California from LA south where there is and actually a majority of the population is spanish speaking.


6 posted on 03/31/2014 6:14:06 PM PDT by Breto (Stranger in a strange land... where did America go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
In July 2003, then-congressman Tom Tancredo (R-Colorado)gave Insight Magazine the following account of his conversation in Mexico with Juan Hernandez, head of the newly created Ministry of Mexicans Living in the United States. According to Mr. Tancredo:

“I asked about the purpose of the government agency he heads, since I had never heard of such a thing. He said its purpose is to increase the flow of Mexican nationals to the United States. I asked, ‘Why?’

"’It serves Mexico's needs,’ he said, and ticked off a list of such things as remittances to Mexico of $10 billion a year, which is 30 percent of the Mexican GDP [gross domestic product]. It provides employment for an exploding population, it alleviates social instability due to rising unemployment and it provides training for Mexicans, ultimately repatriating those skills back to Mexico.

"I responded to his final aim - repatriation of trained and skilled Mexicans back into Mexico - and asked, ‘Then your government would oppose amnesty for the illegal Mexicans in the United States?’

"He cried, ‘Oh no! We support amnesty totally. . . . by populating the United States with millions of Hispanics who are tied economically, politically and linguistically to Mexico, we are able to exert enormous influence and pressure on U.S. policy and its dealings with Mexico.’

"President Vicente Fox believes the U.S. border is a figment of the imagination. In fact, Fox and/or members of his government stated at one point that the borders of Mexico extend much farther north than currently drawn on the map.”

7 posted on 03/31/2014 6:14:58 PM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

He’s whiter than George Zimmerman.


8 posted on 03/31/2014 6:15:02 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813


9 posted on 03/31/2014 6:15:08 PM PDT by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

If he willing to accept all our felons and keep them there, I might be willing to hear what he’s got to say.

Most of the ones they send to us are the least educated. They cannot read or speak English (a lot of them cannot even read Spanish). Additionally, why should they build prisons and incur that cost when they can just dump them on us?


10 posted on 03/31/2014 6:16:17 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Tough tacos.

Exactly. F that MoFo.

11 posted on 03/31/2014 6:17:48 PM PDT by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Vet 70-71 Msgt US Air Force, retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Fair enough, let’s adopt Mexico’s immigration laws.


12 posted on 03/31/2014 6:17:52 PM PDT by Rides_A_Red_Horse (Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Nieto, you’re no Putin, and the US isn’t Crimea. So GFY.


13 posted on 03/31/2014 6:19:27 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I’m sure Bammy wishes he could wear a sash like that....maybe add a few medals to the breast pockets.....


14 posted on 03/31/2014 6:21:54 PM PDT by capydick (''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

You took the words right out of my mouth. Their southern border is protected by the army.


15 posted on 03/31/2014 6:24:07 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Mexico should cede their border states/provinces for proper fumigation.


16 posted on 03/31/2014 6:35:31 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

He doesn’t want ‘em back.


17 posted on 03/31/2014 6:43:45 PM PDT by FixitGuy (By their fruits shall ye know them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

El Presidente Douchebag is lucky I’m not president of the U.S.

I’d invade his craphole of a country and seize their oil fields, and that’s just for starters.


18 posted on 03/31/2014 6:43:45 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (I don't want to feel "safe." I want to feel FREE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Breto
Next he will be claiming right under the Putin doctrine to move across the border to protect Mexican citizens. Most likely target is Southern California from LA south where there is and actually a majority of the population is spanish speaking.

they'd have to make it thru Riverside County first, and that may pose a problem.

19 posted on 03/31/2014 6:51:38 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I’m shocked that there aren’t MORE deportations. Especially of those committing crimes (crimes beyond the first one of entering the country illegally).

Someone should remind this buffoon what his policy is on immigrants on Mexico’s southern border.


20 posted on 03/31/2014 6:58:01 PM PDT by al_c (Obama's standing in the world has fallen so much that Kenya now claims he was born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I suggest we annex Mexico and remove their government and make the people provisional green card holders with no right to vote. Oh I forgot— military is too weak with homosexuals and women. Sorry.


21 posted on 03/31/2014 6:58:56 PM PDT by SADMILLIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

They are not deporting just look at Drudge today.


22 posted on 03/31/2014 7:05:18 PM PDT by amnestynone (Lindsey Graham is a feckless, duplicitous, treacherous, double dealing backstabbing corksucker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott

White Mexican president despise poor brown Mexicans (cholos), he is indignant that they are send back to their country after illegally violating the sovereignty of his north neighbor, although the Mexican government brutally deport those poor, mostly Indians, from Central America who dare to cross Mexico in their quest to reach United States following the example of the poor Mexican nationals.


23 posted on 03/31/2014 7:16:17 PM PDT by Dqban22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

“You took the words right out of my mouth. Their southern border is protected by the army.”

Our southern border should also be protected by the US Army. Defense of the homeland should always come before what the founders described as “foreign adventures.” As long as the homeland is not secure there should be no US forces abroad.


24 posted on 03/31/2014 7:21:52 PM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

“LA RAZA”, “AZTLAN” MEXICO’S DEMOGRAPHIC “RECONQUISTA” OF U.S. SOUTHWEST PAID BY AMERICAN TAXPAYERS

La Raza and Americans
By Jim Simpson
Published May 31, 2007

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/may/30/20070530-094048-2213r/?page=all

A recent proposal in Congress — H.R. 1999, which was cosponsored in April by Reps. Ruben Hinojosa of Texas and Rick Renzi of Arizona — would provide $10 million a year to a radical immigration group, the National Council of La Raza (meaning “the race”). The bill offers funds for “community development and affordable housing projects and programs serving low- and moderate-income households,” for families of “Hispanic origin.”

So giving immigrants the same free medical care, education, food, housing and income support available to all low-income groups is not enough. Now we have to single them out for special treatment, empowering a radical organization in the process. And the bill does not discriminate between legal and illegal immigrants. It is bad enough there are already programs like this. The real dig is that La Raza gets to distribute the money, cementing its position of influence within the immigrant community.

La Raza challenges the “radical” label that Michelle Malkin, U.S. congressmen and others have given it. On its Web site, La Raza makes a forceful argument claiming it opposes illegal immigration, disavows separatist or racist Hispanic movements and only seeks to bring Hispanics into the American mainstream by teaching English, respect for our laws, etc. Sounds truly inspiring, but the organizations and causes it supports tell a different story.

Remember the 1994 California ballot initiative that would have denied social services to illegal immigrants? Proposition 187 was fed up California voters’ answer to the crippling effects of illegal immigration. It passed with 58 percent support. Any rational taxpaying citizen, Hispanic or otherwise, should support it, right? Not La Raza. Along with other groups, La Raza successfully defeated it in court. Here’s the view, as expressed in an address by former La Raza President Raul Yzaguirre at the organization’s 2003 annual conference: Proposition 187 in California and similar proposals elsewhere were ugly efforts to hurt the Latino community.

But we fought back then, and now the Hispanic community is being assaulted once more. This time they don’t want to make you angry, so their tactics are subtle.

La Raza has relied almost entirely on generous American foundation and government grants since its inception in 1968. It received $5.8 million from the feds in 2005, according to its annual report, and now may well get an additional $10 million a year for its trouble. How nice.

It gets better. Have you heard of Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, better known by its acronym MEChA? If you live in California, you have. This group’s Web site states: “We are Chicanos and Chicanas of Aztlan reclaiming the land of out birth,” which according to their revisionist history, includes areas of the Southwestern United States.

In its answer to critics’ charges of support for this radical separatist group, La Raza explains that MEChA is really just a “student organization whose primary objectives are educational” and that their founding charter’s radical goals don’t matter. To make its pathetic case, the group cites, of all things, a passage from a Los Angeles Times article by one Gustavo Arellano that “few [MEChA] members take these dated relics of the 1960s seriously, if they even bothered to read them.”

So we’re supposed to take the word of an LA Times reporter as an answer to this serious charge? The first page of MEChA’s Web site states in bold print “The following documents are essential to the philosophy of MEChA. Every MEChista should be familiar with them,” One of these, the MEChA “Constitution” states in its preamble: “Chicano and Chicana students of Aztlan must take upon themselves the responsibilities to promote Chicanismo within the community, politicizing our Raza [race] with an emphasis on indigenous consciousness to continue the struggle for the self-determination of the Chicano people for the purpose of liberating Aztlan (emphasis mine).” Can’t see how members would ignore that.

NCLR has also teamed up with other openly radical groups like the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) to thwart illegal immigration reform at every turn. To push the current legislation under consideration, they have joined a host of groups under one banner called the Coalition for Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Founded in 2003, this group has received $7 million from Atlantic Philanthropies, a multibillion dollar foundation led by Gare LaMarche, the former vice president and director of U.S. programs for George Soros’ Open Society Institute. The coalition’s objectives, according to Atlantic Philanthropies’ Web site, are “guided by a core set of rights-based immigration principles and priorities, including: a path to permanency for the undocumented, family re-unification and labor protection for future flows.”

So much for moderation.

La Raza’s Web site has a clean, professional look, and its propaganda carries all the buzzwords designed to make it look moderate, very much like the equally radical Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). La Raza has similarly wrapped itself in the mantle of moderation by cultivating friends in both parties, flattering gullible lawmakers.

But is it moderate? No.

According to insiders, the National Council of La Raza had “virtual veto power” over the most recent Senate immigration proposal. These are the folks pushing immigration policy in America.

Is there anywhere left to turn?

Jim Simpson, a free-lance writer, served as an economist and budget analyst for the White House Office of Management and Budget.


25 posted on 03/31/2014 7:32:39 PM PDT by Dqban22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dqban22

Aztlan’s mole in the White House, Cecilia Muñoz, Obama’s Domestic Policy Council director, was La Raza’s director of research and advocacy before moving to the White House.


26 posted on 03/31/2014 7:40:47 PM PDT by Dqban22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: montag813
"How dare you resist our invasion of your country!"
27 posted on 03/31/2014 7:43:19 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Outsourcing poverty to us and getting mad that out of every 1000 we send one back (for about a week) is like making your neighbor pay your income tax, and then getting mad he keeps the refund.


28 posted on 03/31/2014 7:44:25 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Pobrecito


29 posted on 03/31/2014 7:58:01 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Deportations of Mexican illegals is ‘’indignant’’? I should think just being Mexican indignity enough.


30 posted on 03/31/2014 8:20:28 PM PDT by jmacusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dqban22

Being labeled as a mutual “oppressor” is the first step in creating a ‘common enemy.’ This is the level of acorn activism and brainwashing we are up against:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNnQpAXLrIM


31 posted on 03/31/2014 8:58:01 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

He wants Mexico to be a clown car, not a highway.


32 posted on 03/31/2014 9:04:15 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813

yup.


33 posted on 03/31/2014 10:08:22 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Eat pooh there Mexican


34 posted on 04/01/2014 3:27:48 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Call the WAAAMBULAMPS.


35 posted on 04/01/2014 4:25:55 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South
Our southern border should also be protected by the US Army. Defense of the homeland should always come before what the founders described as “foreign adventures.” As long as the homeland is not secure there should be no US forces abroad.

Agreed.

36 posted on 04/01/2014 5:52:26 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

Mexico’s illegals laws tougher than Arizona’s

By Jerry Seper

The Washington Times

You should be measured in the same way you measure others.

Under the Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony, punishable by up to two years in prison. Immigrants who are deported and attempt to re-enter can be imprisoned for 10 years. Visa violators can be sentenced to six-year terms. Mexicans who help illegal immigrants are considered criminals.

The law also says Mexico can deport foreigners who are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” violate Mexican law, are not “physically or mentally healthy” or lack the “necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents.

“This sounds like the kind of law that a rational nation would have to protect itself against illegal immigrants — that would stop and punish the very people who are violating the law,” said Rep. Steve King of Iowa, ranking Republican on the House Judiciary subcommittee on immigration, citizenship, refugees, border security and international law.

He said skyrocketing violence on the border, including the recent killing of an Arizona rancher by an illegal immigrant he had gone to assist, has not gone unnoticed by the public, adding that until the federal government provides the necessary funding and manpower to adequately secure the southwestern border, Arizona will not long remain the only state to pass legislation to do it on its own...

Rep. Ted Poe, Texas Republican and a member of the House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs committees, described Mexican president criticism as “arrogant and hypocritical.” He said Mexico’s immigrations laws are “even tougher than those in the United States” and it was inappropriate to denounce the Arizona law when “Mexico does the very same thing.”

The rest of the history:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/3/mexicos-illegals-laws-tougher-than-arizonas/print/


37 posted on 04/01/2014 10:06:08 AM PDT by Dqban22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: montag813
More lies and more pap for the population directed at the CNN cup droolers.

The U.S. has upwards of 25++ million illegals running through our streets, and this costumed bozo cries about deportations?

Is anyone stupid enough to buy this cowflop?

38 posted on 04/01/2014 10:19:32 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Breto
Next he will be claiming under Putin doctrine to move across the border to protect Mexican citizens.

And why shouldn't he? It's a strong argument for sending Mexicans back to their homeland....for good.

39 posted on 04/01/2014 10:29:26 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Obama’s Illegal Immigration Free-For-All

Posted By Matthew Vadum On March 28, 2014 In Daily Mailer,FrontPage

The Obama administration is barely enforcing immigration laws against illegal immigrants now and intends to do even less in the future, according to Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama).

“The evidence reveals that the Administration has carried out a dramatic nullification of federal law,” Sessions told Breitbart News.

“Under the guise of setting ‘priorities,’ the Administration has determined that almost anyone in the world who can enter the United States is free to illegally live, work and claim benefits here as long as they are not caught committing a felony or other serious crime.”

Sessions’s comments came after his office released a three-page “Critical Alert” prepared by the senator’s staffers. The report asserts that the Obama administration is currently blocking the enforcement of immigration laws in the overwhelming majority of violations and is planning to turn down the heat on illegals even more by further expanding the various de facto presidential amnesties now in effect.

President Obama has taken three separate, legally and constitutionally dubious actions that when considered collectively guarantee that almost no individuals illegally present in the country will be deported if their sole act of lawbreaking consists of being in the country.

The rest of the history...

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/obamas-illegal-immigration-free-for-all/print/


40 posted on 04/01/2014 10:41:03 AM PDT by Dqban22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson