Posted on 03/31/2014 6:09:20 PM PDT by montag813
Above: El Presidente is shocked -- shocked -- that the U.S.
doesn't want his poorest and most criminally-minded citizens.
by John Urban | Top Right News
Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto said he is "indignant" at the United States' deportation of Mexican migrants and described U.S. lawmakers as demonstrating a "lack of conscience" in failing to pass immigration reform.
Translation? Mexico's head Conquistador is sore that the peasants they have worked so hard to export to the chumps in El Norte are being sent back to them.
There I said it.
Mexico does everything it can to rid itself of its poorest and brownest citizens and use Los Estados Unidos as its outsourced welfare state; helps them grab every social service benefit they can get while they're here; demand they be handed U.S. citizenship; sue if there is any "discrimination" (i.e. law enforcement) against them; and howls like mad if a single one is deported.
(Excerpt) Read more at toprightnews.com ...
I suggest we annex Mexico and remove their government and make the people provisional green card holders with no right to vote. Oh I forgot— military is too weak with homosexuals and women. Sorry.
They are not deporting just look at Drudge today.
White Mexican president despise poor brown Mexicans (cholos), he is indignant that they are send back to their country after illegally violating the sovereignty of his north neighbor, although the Mexican government brutally deport those poor, mostly Indians, from Central America who dare to cross Mexico in their quest to reach United States following the example of the poor Mexican nationals.
“You took the words right out of my mouth. Their southern border is protected by the army.”
Our southern border should also be protected by the US Army. Defense of the homeland should always come before what the founders described as “foreign adventures.” As long as the homeland is not secure there should be no US forces abroad.
“LA RAZA”, “AZTLAN” MEXICO’S DEMOGRAPHIC “RECONQUISTA” OF U.S. SOUTHWEST PAID BY AMERICAN TAXPAYERS
La Raza and Americans
By Jim Simpson
Published May 31, 2007
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/may/30/20070530-094048-2213r/?page=all
A recent proposal in Congress — H.R. 1999, which was cosponsored in April by Reps. Ruben Hinojosa of Texas and Rick Renzi of Arizona — would provide $10 million a year to a radical immigration group, the National Council of La Raza (meaning “the race”). The bill offers funds for “community development and affordable housing projects and programs serving low- and moderate-income households,” for families of “Hispanic origin.”
So giving immigrants the same free medical care, education, food, housing and income support available to all low-income groups is not enough. Now we have to single them out for special treatment, empowering a radical organization in the process. And the bill does not discriminate between legal and illegal immigrants. It is bad enough there are already programs like this. The real dig is that La Raza gets to distribute the money, cementing its position of influence within the immigrant community.
La Raza challenges the “radical” label that Michelle Malkin, U.S. congressmen and others have given it. On its Web site, La Raza makes a forceful argument claiming it opposes illegal immigration, disavows separatist or racist Hispanic movements and only seeks to bring Hispanics into the American mainstream by teaching English, respect for our laws, etc. Sounds truly inspiring, but the organizations and causes it supports tell a different story.
Remember the 1994 California ballot initiative that would have denied social services to illegal immigrants? Proposition 187 was fed up California voters’ answer to the crippling effects of illegal immigration. It passed with 58 percent support. Any rational taxpaying citizen, Hispanic or otherwise, should support it, right? Not La Raza. Along with other groups, La Raza successfully defeated it in court. Here’s the view, as expressed in an address by former La Raza President Raul Yzaguirre at the organization’s 2003 annual conference: Proposition 187 in California and similar proposals elsewhere were ugly efforts to hurt the Latino community.
But we fought back then, and now the Hispanic community is being assaulted once more. This time they don’t want to make you angry, so their tactics are subtle.
La Raza has relied almost entirely on generous American foundation and government grants since its inception in 1968. It received $5.8 million from the feds in 2005, according to its annual report, and now may well get an additional $10 million a year for its trouble. How nice.
It gets better. Have you heard of Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, better known by its acronym MEChA? If you live in California, you have. This group’s Web site states: “We are Chicanos and Chicanas of Aztlan reclaiming the land of out birth,” which according to their revisionist history, includes areas of the Southwestern United States.
In its answer to critics’ charges of support for this radical separatist group, La Raza explains that MEChA is really just a “student organization whose primary objectives are educational” and that their founding charter’s radical goals don’t matter. To make its pathetic case, the group cites, of all things, a passage from a Los Angeles Times article by one Gustavo Arellano that “few [MEChA] members take these dated relics of the 1960s seriously, if they even bothered to read them.”
So we’re supposed to take the word of an LA Times reporter as an answer to this serious charge? The first page of MEChA’s Web site states in bold print “The following documents are essential to the philosophy of MEChA. Every MEChista should be familiar with them,” One of these, the MEChA “Constitution” states in its preamble: “Chicano and Chicana students of Aztlan must take upon themselves the responsibilities to promote Chicanismo within the community, politicizing our Raza [race] with an emphasis on indigenous consciousness to continue the struggle for the self-determination of the Chicano people for the purpose of liberating Aztlan (emphasis mine).” Can’t see how members would ignore that.
NCLR has also teamed up with other openly radical groups like the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) to thwart illegal immigration reform at every turn. To push the current legislation under consideration, they have joined a host of groups under one banner called the Coalition for Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Founded in 2003, this group has received $7 million from Atlantic Philanthropies, a multibillion dollar foundation led by Gare LaMarche, the former vice president and director of U.S. programs for George Soros’ Open Society Institute. The coalition’s objectives, according to Atlantic Philanthropies’ Web site, are “guided by a core set of rights-based immigration principles and priorities, including: a path to permanency for the undocumented, family re-unification and labor protection for future flows.”
So much for moderation.
La Raza’s Web site has a clean, professional look, and its propaganda carries all the buzzwords designed to make it look moderate, very much like the equally radical Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). La Raza has similarly wrapped itself in the mantle of moderation by cultivating friends in both parties, flattering gullible lawmakers.
But is it moderate? No.
According to insiders, the National Council of La Raza had “virtual veto power” over the most recent Senate immigration proposal. These are the folks pushing immigration policy in America.
Is there anywhere left to turn?
Jim Simpson, a free-lance writer, served as an economist and budget analyst for the White House Office of Management and Budget.
Aztlan’s mole in the White House, Cecilia Muñoz, Obama’s Domestic Policy Council director, was La Raza’s director of research and advocacy before moving to the White House.
Outsourcing poverty to us and getting mad that out of every 1000 we send one back (for about a week) is like making your neighbor pay your income tax, and then getting mad he keeps the refund.
Pobrecito
Deportations of Mexican illegals is ‘’indignant’’? I should think just being Mexican indignity enough.
Being labeled as a mutual “oppressor” is the first step in creating a ‘common enemy.’ This is the level of acorn activism and brainwashing we are up against:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNnQpAXLrIM
He wants Mexico to be a clown car, not a highway.
yup.
Eat pooh there Mexican
Call the WAAAMBULAMPS.
Agreed.
Mexico’s illegals laws tougher than Arizona’s
By Jerry Seper
The Washington Times
You should be measured in the same way you measure others.
Under the Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony, punishable by up to two years in prison. Immigrants who are deported and attempt to re-enter can be imprisoned for 10 years. Visa violators can be sentenced to six-year terms. Mexicans who help illegal immigrants are considered criminals.
The law also says Mexico can deport foreigners who are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” violate Mexican law, are not “physically or mentally healthy” or lack the “necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents.
“This sounds like the kind of law that a rational nation would have to protect itself against illegal immigrants — that would stop and punish the very people who are violating the law,” said Rep. Steve King of Iowa, ranking Republican on the House Judiciary subcommittee on immigration, citizenship, refugees, border security and international law.
He said skyrocketing violence on the border, including the recent killing of an Arizona rancher by an illegal immigrant he had gone to assist, has not gone unnoticed by the public, adding that until the federal government provides the necessary funding and manpower to adequately secure the southwestern border, Arizona will not long remain the only state to pass legislation to do it on its own...
Rep. Ted Poe, Texas Republican and a member of the House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs committees, described Mexican president criticism as “arrogant and hypocritical.” He said Mexico’s immigrations laws are “even tougher than those in the United States” and it was inappropriate to denounce the Arizona law when “Mexico does the very same thing.”
The rest of the history:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/3/mexicos-illegals-laws-tougher-than-arizonas/print/
The U.S. has upwards of 25++ million illegals running through our streets, and this costumed bozo cries about deportations?
Is anyone stupid enough to buy this cowflop?
And why shouldn't he? It's a strong argument for sending Mexicans back to their homeland....for good.
Obama’s Illegal Immigration Free-For-All
Posted By Matthew Vadum On March 28, 2014 In Daily Mailer,FrontPage
The Obama administration is barely enforcing immigration laws against illegal immigrants now and intends to do even less in the future, according to Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama).
“The evidence reveals that the Administration has carried out a dramatic nullification of federal law,” Sessions told Breitbart News.
“Under the guise of setting ‘priorities,’ the Administration has determined that almost anyone in the world who can enter the United States is free to illegally live, work and claim benefits here as long as they are not caught committing a felony or other serious crime.”
Sessions’s comments came after his office released a three-page “Critical Alert” prepared by the senator’s staffers. The report asserts that the Obama administration is currently blocking the enforcement of immigration laws in the overwhelming majority of violations and is planning to turn down the heat on illegals even more by further expanding the various de facto presidential amnesties now in effect.
President Obama has taken three separate, legally and constitutionally dubious actions that when considered collectively guarantee that almost no individuals illegally present in the country will be deported if their sole act of lawbreaking consists of being in the country.
The rest of the history...
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/matthew-vadum/obamas-illegal-immigration-free-for-all/print/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.