Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/03/2014 5:20:59 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Perdogg

Obamacare will be dead when people don’t pay the penalty.


2 posted on 04/03/2014 5:24:47 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

No.


3 posted on 04/03/2014 5:25:20 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

nope.


5 posted on 04/03/2014 5:25:54 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

I am a skeptic. I do not think SCOTUS will rule in favor of the Constitution, conscience and Hobby Lobby.

I hope I’m wrong.


6 posted on 04/03/2014 5:26:03 PM PDT by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
The question is, if the Supreme Court rules against Hobby Lobby, are our liberties dead, and, most importantly, what are we going to do about it?
7 posted on 04/03/2014 5:27:01 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

No

Just allows these groups to exempt themselves. It doesn’t help them of course, but I think the doctors will decide this law. And a lot of them are retiring or going fully private for cash payments.


9 posted on 04/03/2014 5:29:52 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

That would be so wonderful.


10 posted on 04/03/2014 5:30:08 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

The Führer will just tell you it isn’t...


11 posted on 04/03/2014 5:32:42 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Now that it’s here, it will never be dead. That’s why Dems were in such a damn hurry to give it to us, and why Repubs have only half-heartedly fought it — it means generations of “an issue” to fight over, tweak, and pretend to fix, all the while just scraping enough votes to get them to the next election, when they can do it all over again. Just like Social Security and “the debt.”


14 posted on 04/03/2014 5:41:36 PM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
serviceability clause?
15 posted on 04/03/2014 5:42:51 PM PDT by OldPossum ("It's" is the contraction of "it" and "is"; think about ITS implications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

I don’t trust this court to rule righteously on this debacle called 0bamacare at all.


16 posted on 04/03/2014 5:48:00 PM PDT by Sister_T (So, ACA is the law of the land? Remember: DADT and DOMA were the laws of the land! Repeal ACA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Try to understand the Catholic perspective. Catholics have rightly held that the Obama administration is guilty of vile anti Catholic bigotry. It knew exactly what it was doing when it passed administrative rules that would force Catholics to violate their deeply held religious beliefs by funding the use of abortion inducing drugs. Otherwise as a matter of conscience they would have to close institutions that are a part of their religious expression i.e. health care, social services, education. The Supreme Court Justices who would vote to uphold these regulations would forever be known as anti Catholic bigots. If they decide in favor of the non Catholic Hobby Lobby case, then the appellate courts should find the anti Catholic rules unconstitutional.It would spare the Justices the bigot label.


17 posted on 04/03/2014 5:48:42 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

What happens if they rule against The Little Sisters of the Poor? If the nuns dont comply and I believe they won’t are they going to send in armed agents to sieze assets anxd evict the elderly? I don’t think Obama and Jarrett have considered the blowback on such an Atlas Shrugged event.


18 posted on 04/03/2014 5:50:21 PM PDT by Blackirish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

if obamacare dies and takes the health insurance industry with it, it won’t matter


21 posted on 04/03/2014 5:58:28 PM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Well, campaign finance reform is surely dead after yesterday. The Supremes will probably kill it on the installment plan.


23 posted on 04/03/2014 5:59:03 PM PDT by cotton1706 (ThisRepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Maybe you mean severability? If one section is bad then the whole document isn’t bad, just that one section.

Wasn’t the fact that nobamacare has no severability clause one of the first problems it had?


31 posted on 04/03/2014 6:30:55 PM PDT by upchuck (South Carolina Representative Trey Gowdy for Speaker of the House!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

No, that won’t do it.


33 posted on 04/03/2014 6:51:25 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

They won’t, Roberts is in their corner.


35 posted on 04/03/2014 6:58:38 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

I’m sure you meant “severability” clause, not serviceability.


36 posted on 04/03/2014 7:04:08 PM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

“How is it that you can tell what the weather will be by how the sky looks at sunset or sunrise, discerning the signs of the sky - but you do not know the sign of the times?’

Paraphrasing Matthew 16:3

The zeitgeist says SCOTUS will rule against Christianity and empower the god of fascist government and dominance to subjugate them.

It has already been decreed that we do not have the right of the free exercise of religion. It is accepted that we only have a right not to be offended by religion.

The times say that we have no right to biblical religion and faith outside of a box that is hidden so as to not offend the hedonist or the Muslim.


38 posted on 04/03/2014 7:11:35 PM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson